RLIF World Rankings Information & RLIF World Rankings Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Website Rankings : Mercola.com is World 's #1 for January 2009
Website Rankings: Mercola.com is World's #1 for January 2009
mercola.com
 U.S.News & World Report Rankings - University of Chicago Medical Center
U.S.News & World Report Rankings - University of Chicago Medical Center
uchospitals.edu
 honored in three U.S. News & World Report...
honored in three U.S. News & World Report...
kumed.com
 
Top 30 Rankings
as of March 2009
[1]
Rank Change Team Points
1 --  Australia
2 --  New Zealand
3 --  England
4 2  Fiji
5 --  France
6 1  Papua New Guinea
7 2  Ireland
8 4  Tonga
9 2  Scotland
10 2  Samoa
11 3  Lebanon
12 2  Wales
13 --  Russia
14 3  Cook Islands
15 1  United States
16 4  Serbia
17 11  Japan
18 2  Italy
19 3  Germany
20 11  Czech Republic
21 ?  Latvia
22 7  Estonia
23 7  South Africa
24 12  Jamaica
24 3  Morocco
26 5  Greece
27 8  Malta
28 ?  Ukraine
29 3  Niue
30 6  Tokelau

The RLIF World Rankings is a ranking system for men's national teams in the sport of rugby league. The teams of the member nations of RLIF, rugby league's world governing body, are ranked based on their game results with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A point system is used, with points being awarded based on the results of RLIF-recognized international matches. Under the existing system, rankings are based on a team's performance over the last three years, with more recent results and more significant matches being more heavily weighted to help reflect the current competitive state of a team.

Contents

[edit] Ranking system

The RLIF World Rankings are calculated based on an average of points accumulated by each Nation over a three year cycle. Under the structure, matches deemed of higher importance such as World Cup games, Four Nations and other major tournament finals draw more points than mid-season Tests and other ‘Internationals’. For each match that a nation participates they are given a base level of points. This base level is affected upon the type of match (World Cup, Major Tournament, Test Match and International) and the status of the opponent.

Bonus points are given for teams that reach certain milestones deemed of significant international importance including reaching a tournament final or qualifying for an event such as a World Cup.

From the total number of points that a nation will receive these points are then averaged to help give a more accurate view of the performance of a nation over the three year cycle.

Nations which have played less than 5 matches over a three year cycle will be penalised under the current point structure.

[edit] Use of the rankings

The rankings are used by Rugby League International Federation to view the progression and ability of the national rugby league teams.

The data is currently used in things as seeding for tournaments such as the European Cup, Mediterranean Cup and Pacific Cup.

[edit] Criticism

Since the ranking system's introduction in 2007 many people[who?] have criticized the rankings of some of the teams placings in the official standings released by the Rugby League International Federation with claims that the strength of the teams are often seen as a secondary force in the moving of rankings in comparison with the amount of fixtures that are played in by a nation.[citation needed]

The counter balancing argument to this though is that this system encourages nations to play in more international matches or 'friendlies' outside of just major tournaments in the hope of gaining a higher RLIF ranking.

[edit] Current calculation method

[edit] Match status

A weighting system has been implemented by the RLIF to give more points to teams if they gain a victory over a major team in a major tournament, with friendlies ranked with considerably less points than any World Cup finals match or the final of Cups such as the European, Mediterranean and Pacific Cups.

[edit] Opponent strength

The RLIF has organized the rankings so that a win against a very highly ranked opponent is a considerably greater achievement than a win against a low-rated opponent, so the strength of the opposing team is a factor.

[edit] Assessment period

All matches played over the last thirty-six months or three years are included in the calculation of the rankings, but there is a weighting system implemented to put more emphasis on recent results.

[edit] Ranking schedule

Rankings are calculated throughout each year but are based only on matches played in the previous three years with the most recent update being in March 2009.

A team must play at least five matches over the RLIF designated period to be included in the rankings without having a penalty applied to the nations national team.

[edit] Unranked with 'Official Observer Status'

 Belgium
 Catalonia
 Cuba
 Denmark
 Hawaii
 Hungary
 Norway
 Pakistan
 Panama
 Portugal
 Saudi Arabia
 Solomon Islands
 Sweden
 United Arab Emirates

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ [1]

[edit] External links




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots