Primary/secondary quality distinction Information & Primary/secondary quality distinction Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Secondary Infertility: What is Secondary Infertility? - Fertility Video:
Secondary Infertility: What is Secondary Infertility? - Fertility Video:
arcfertility.com
 Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Primary Secondary Liver Cancer...
Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Primary Secondary Liver Cancer...
martinsurgery.com.au
 Medical Device Network - Over-Current Protection for Primary and...
Medical Device Network - Over-Current Protection for Primary and...
medicaldevice-network.com
 

The primary/secondary quality distinction is a conceptual distinction in epistemology and metaphysics, concerning the nature of reality. It is most explicitly articulated by John Locke in his Essay concerning Human Understanding, but earlier thinkers such as Galileo and Descartes made similar distinctions.

Primary qualities are properties that objects have independent of any observer, such as solidity, extension, motion, number and figure. These characteristics convey facts. They exist in the thing itself, can be determined with certainty, and do not rely on subjective judgments. For example, if a ball is round, no one can reasonably argue that it is a triangle.

Secondary qualities are properties that produce sensations in observers, such as colour, taste, smell, and sound. They can be described as the effect things have on certain people. Knowledge that comes from secondary qualities does not provide objective facts about things.

Primary qualities are measurable aspects of physical reality. Secondary qualities are subjective.


Contents

[edit] History

A prism divides white light into its constituent colors.
  • “By convention there are sweet and bitter, hot and cold, by convention there is color; but in truth there are atoms and the void”

– Democritus, Fragment 9. [1]

  • “I think that tastes, odors, colors, and so on are no more than mere names so far as the object in which we locate them are concerned, and that they reside in consciousness. Hence if the living creature were removed, all these qualities would be wiped away and annihilated”

– Galileo Galilei, The Assayer (published 1623). [2]

  • “For the rays, to speak properly, are not colored. In them there is nothing else than a certain power and disposition to stir up a sensation of this or that color.”

– Isaac Newton Optics (3rd ed. 1721, original in 1704). [3]

[edit] Criticism

George Berkeley is a famous critic of the distinction. Berkeley maintains that the ideas created by sensations are all that people can know for sure. As a result, what is perceived as real or true consists only of ideas in the mind. In other words, nothing exists except as ideas in one's mind.

[edit] References

  1. ^ (Quoted by Sextus Empiricus, Adv. Math. vii 135)
  2. ^ As reprinted in (Drake, 1957, p. 274)
  3. ^ Reprinted in (Newton, 1953, ed. Chris Jamieson, p. 100)

[edit] See also




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots