Law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Crime in the UK · Terrorism in the UK

Topics

Agencies (defunct) · Firearms use · History · Ranks · Table of police forces

Equipment

Aviation · Firearms list · Uniform and equipment · Vehicles

Types of agency

Territorial police forces · Special police forces · Port police · Park police (London) · Service police · Non-police · Other

Types of agent

Accredited Person · Bailiff · Civil enforcement officer · Constable · Court security officer · Customs officer · Traffic officer · Immigration officer · Police Community Support Officer · Police Custody and Security Officer · Tipstaff · Traffic warden · Water bailiff · Wildlife inspector

Concepts

Chief police officer · Home Office · Police area · Police authority · Police cadets · Police Federation of England and Wales · Scottish Police Federation · Stop, search, detention and arrest powers · Police Oath · Scotland Yard · Warrant card

Acts

Police Act 1964 · Police (Scotland) Act 1967 · Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 · Police Act 1996 · Police Reform Act 2002 · Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 ·

Law · Courts · Prisons

v • d • e

In the United Kingdom, the majority of police officers do not carry firearms, except in special circumstances. This originates from the formation of the Metropolitan Police Service in the 19th century, when police were not armed, partly to counter public fears and objections concerning armed enforcers as this had been previously seen due to the British Army maintaining order when needed. The arming of police in the United Kingdom is a perennial topic of debate.

Most officers are instead issued with other items for personal defence, such as Speedcuffs, Extendable "ASP" Baton, and incapacitant sprays such as PAVA or CS spray. While not a "normal" firearm, CS spray is subject to the same rules and regulations as a projectile firing firearm under Section 5 (b) of the Firearms Act 1968.^[1].

The Ministry of Defence Police, Civil Nuclear Constabulary and Police Service of Northern Ireland (formerly the Royal Ulster Constabulary) are issued firearms as a matter of routine. Every force can also call upon the Force Firearms Unit's, Armed Response Vehicle in a matter of minutes, and certain specialist units of the Metropolitan Police are routinely armed.

Contents 1 History 1.1 Arming the police 1.2 Shootings of police officers 2 Legal status 3 Firearms used 4 Notable incidents 5 "Shoot to kill" policy 6 See also 7 References

[edit] History

[edit] Arming the police

Police use of firearms in the United Kingdom has been a slow, controversial^[2] and developing process as senior officers wanted their forces to still have the "British Bobby" or Dixon of Dock Green effect on the community^[2]. During the Second World War firearms were only carried on protection duties such as 10 Downing Street and the Royal Family, but police were given many firearms in case of invasion^[2]. Although they were never taken on general patrol, due to the lack of equipment when issued with a firearm it was usually without a holster to accommodate the weapon^[2], as all available equipment was in huge demand because of the war^[2]. Training for the Webley & Scott Revolvers usually consisted of firing six shots and to pass, it was required that three shots had to be on target although loading of the actual weapon was not taught^[2]. Even more so in the after war years when ex service men were in the police as their previous knowledge was thought to suffice. In 1948, after the Second World War Concerns were aired by the Home Office of the police forces role of another war or nuclear attack^[2], to combat this it was decided that some of the forces would be loaned Sten Guns by the Ministry of Defence and a number of Lee Enfield No4 Mk 2s these along with revolvers and ammunition were kept in secret depots around the United Kingdom so every force had the weapons close and could get access to them when and if the time come.^[2]

Historically, officers on night patrols in some London divisions were frequently armed with Webley revolvers. These were introduced following the murder of two officers in 1884, although individual officers were able to choose whether to carry the weapons. After the Battle of Stepney in 1911, Webley semi-automatics were issued to officers, armed police were rare by the turn of the century, and were retired formally in July 1936. From that point on, firearms could only be issued by a Sergeant with good reason, and only then to officers who had been trained in their usage.

The issue of routine arming was raised after the 1952 Derek Bentley case where a Constable was shot dead and a Sergeant severely wounded, and again after the 1966 Massacre of Braybrook Street, in which three London officers were killed. As a result, around 17% of officers in London became authorised to carry firearms. After the deaths of a number of members of the public in the 1980s fired upon by police, control was considerably tightened, many officers had their firearm authorisation revoked, and training for the remainder was greatly improved. As of 2005, around seven per cent of officers in London are trained in the use of firearms. Firearms are also only issued to an officer under strict guidelines.^[3]

In order to allow armed officers to respond rapidly to an incident, most forces have patrolling Armed Response Vehicles (ARVs). ARVs were modelled on the Instant Response Cars introduced by the West Yorkshire Police in 1976, and were first introduced in London in 1991, with 132 armed deployments being made that year.

Although largely attributable to a significant increase in the use of imitation firearms and air weapons^[4], the overall increase in firearms crime between 1998/99 and 2002/03^[4] (it has been decreasing since 2003/04, although use of imitations continued to rise)^[4] has kept this issue in the spotlight. In October 2000, Nottinghamshire Police introduced regular armed patrols to the St Ann's and Meadows estates in Nottingham, in response to fourteen drug-related shootings in the two areas in the previous year.^[5] Although the measure was not intended to be permanent, patrols were stepped up in the autumn of 2001 after further shootings.^[6] Despite this, Police Federation surveys have continued to show overwhelming police officer resistance to routine arming. In the Federation's most recent (2006) Officer/Arming survey, 82% of respondents were against the routine arming of police.^[7]

As of September 2004, all forces in England and Wales have access to tasers, but they may only be used by Authorised Firearms Officers and 'Specially Trained Units'. The Police Federation have since called for all officers to be issued with tasers, with some public support.^[8]

[edit] Shootings of police officers

Outside of Northern Ireland, shootings of police officers are rare, between 1900 and 2006 67 officers were killed by firearms.^[9] Since 1990 six officers have died from gunshot wounds, including Ian Broadhurst in December 2003^[10], and Sharon Beshenivsky in November 2005.^[11]In both cases multiple officers were shot, with the two incidents accounting for four officers being shot. Deaths have been much higher in Northern Ireland, with over two hundred firearms fatalities, the vast majority linked to The Troubles.^[12]

[edit] Legal status

The usage of firearms by the police is covered by statute (such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and Human Rights Act 1998), policy (such as the Home Office Code of Practice on Police use of Firearms and Less Lethal Weapons and the ACPO Manual of Guidance on Police Use of Firearms) and common law.

AFOs may only carry firearms when authorised by an "appropriate authorising officer".^[13] The appropriate authorising officer must be of the rank of Inspector or higher.^[14] When working at airports, nuclear sites, on Protection Duties and deployed in Armed Response Vehicles in certain areas, 'Standing Authority' is granted to carry personal sidearms.^[15] All members of the Police Service of Northern Ireland have authority to carry a personal issue handgun as a matter of routine.^[16] In all forces, usage of other weapons such as semi-automatic carbines requires further training and authorisation. Semi-automatic carbines are stored in a locked armoury which is situated in the boot of an Armed Response Vehicle. Equipping of semi-automatic carbines rests on a judgment of the AFO.^[2]

United Kingdom law allows the use of "reasonable force" in order to make an arrest or prevent a crime^[17][18] or to defend one's self.^[19] However, if the force used is fatal, then the European Convention of Human Rights only allows "the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary".^[20] Firearms officers may therefore only discharge their weapons "to stop an imminent threat to life" ^[21].

ACPO policy states that "use" of a firearm includes both pointing it at a person and discharging it (whether accidentally, negligently or on purpose).^[22] As with all use of force in England and Wales, the onus is on the individual officer to justify their actions in court.^[23]

[edit] Firearms used

Different police forces use a variety of firearms. Although, for forces in England and Wales, guidance is provided from ACPO and the Home Office^[24] decisions on what weapons will be employed by an individual force largely rest with the Chief Constable.

[edit] Notable incidents

The following are examples of incidents of shootings by British police officers, all of which resulted some in controversy.

• In June 1980, hostage Gail Kinchin and her unborn baby were killed in crossfire between West Midlands officers and her deranged boyfriend. Later, he stood trial for her murder but, after an 18-day hearing, was found not guilty.

• On 17 January 1983 Stephen Waldorf was shot by police hunting David Martin, who absconded from custody at Marlborough Street magistrates' court where he was due to face a charge of attempting to murder a police officer. Waldorf was critically injured in a police ambush in a west London street after he was mistaken for Martin. He was shot five times, and then pistol whipped by an officer who had attempted to shoot him in the head, but had already used all his ammunition. Two officers, John Jardine and Peter Finch, stood trial for attempted murder and attempted wounding but were cleared of all charges in October 1983. Waldorf made a full recovery and eventually received compensation.^[25]

• On 24 August 1985 John Shorthouse aged 5 was shot dead in a police raid on his home in Birmingham. The incident produced hostility towards the police over two days after John's death when a policewoman was dragged from her patrol car and beaten by youths. PC Brian Chester, stood trial for manslaughter but was acquitted. Following the Shorthouse case, West Midlands police abandoned its practice of training rank-and-file officers for firearms duties and formed a specialist squad.^[26]

• On 15 January 1987 Cherry Groce, a mother-of-six, was shot and paralysed by officers looking for her son. The shooting sparked riots in Brixton which led to the death of a photographer, hit on the head by a brick. The officer was cleared of all criminal charges.^[27]

• On 15 January 1998 James Ashley, 39, was shot and killed by Sussex Police while naked and unarmed during a drugs raid at his flat.^[28]

• In June 1999 Derek Bateman, 47, of Surrey was shot by a single bullet through the heart after his girlfriend went to a neighbour's house and telephone the police, telling them he was armed and had threatening to shoot her. It was then determined that the weapon he had brandished at the police was an air pistol. No officer was prosecuted.^[29]

• On 22 September 1999 Harry Stanley, a painter and decorator, born in Bellshill near Glasgow, was walking home when he was shot dead by two Metropolitan Police officers following an erroneous report that he was carrying a sawn-off shotgun in a plastic bag. The officers challenged Mr Stanley from behind as he turned to face them, they shot him dead at a distance of 5 metres. It later emerged that the plastic bag actually contained a broken table leg that Stanley's brother had just fixed for him. Following numerous enquiries (in November 2004 a jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing) both officers were exonerated after 6 years of court cases and inquiries. It was found that neither officer was liable for criminal charges nor would face any disciplinary sanctions. However, the report did make notable recommendations to the police on the post-incident procedure to be followed after a shooting and about challenging members of the public from behind.^[30]

• On 12 July 2001 Mr Andrew Kernan, 37, a gardener from Wavertree in Liverpool was shot dead in the street by the second of two shots fired by officers of the Merseyside Police Force. The officers had been called to the scene by the victim's mother, Marie Kernan, who had also requested a psychiatric medical team attend her home because her schizophrenic son, Andrew Kernan, was being aggressive. At least four police officers from the Merseyside force went to Mrs Kernan's flat but Andrew Kernan ran into the street, dressed in his pyjamas, wielding a Katana. Mr Kernan slashed off the wing mirror of one of the police cars. After negotiating with him for 25 minutes and using CS gas officers fired two shots. The second bullet hit Mr Kernan in the chest and he died on the way to hospital.

In the case of Andrew Kernan, the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police Norman Bettison took the unusual step of sending a hand-written letter to Marie Kernan with his apologies. The then Home Secretary David Blunkett ordered a review of how armed police were used, and the dead man's mother, Marie Kernan, 59, commented at the time: "You don't kill somebody with a mental illness. I demand justice for Andrew and won't rest until I get an answer." However, a verdict of lawful killing was returned by the jury at Liverpool District Coroner's Court on 9 December 2004, and the Coroner, Andre Rebello, praised the actions of the officers at the scene. The IPCA Commissioner for the North West, Mike Franklin, stated that “the officers involved in this case were presented with a rapidly evolving scenario... Firearms officers at the scene acted bravely and the investigation has found no evidence that their actions fell below that required or expected of them." ^[31]

• In July 2005, West Yorkshire police tasered a man in hypoglycaemic shock, believing that he was a potential security threat.^[32]

• On 22 July 2005, Jean Charles de Menezes, a Brazilian national living in London, was shot dead by unnamed Metropolitan Police officers on board an Underground train at Stockwell tube station, in the belief he was a suicide bomber. Initially, police claimed incorrectly that he was wearing bulky clothing and that he had vaulted the ticket barriers running from police. It soon became clear that de Menezes did not vault and run from the police, but police did not correct their statement until the correct information was leaked to the press. They later issued an apology, saying that they had mistaken him for a suspect in the previous day's failed bombings and acknowledging that de Menezes in fact had no explosives and was unconnected with the attempted bombings. Following an investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), the Crown Prosecution Service announced on 17 July 2006, that no charges would be brought against any individual officers in relation to the death of Jean Charles. Sir Ian Blair, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police will, however, face charges under Health and Safety legislation in his professional - rather than personal - capacity. The family of Jean Charles has called on the government to open a public inquiry into the shooting.^[33]

• On 2 June 2006, two family homes were raided in an operation involving 250 police in east London. One man, Abdul Kahar, was shot in the shoulder by police during the raid, but was later released without charge. The raid was based on faulty intelligence. No officer has been prosecuted in connection with the shooting.

• According to an October 2005 article in The Independent, in the preceding 12 years, 30 people had been shot dead by police, and no officers had been convicted in connection with any of them. ^[34]

[edit] "Shoot to kill" policy

The national media has criticised the so-called "shoot to kill" policy apparently adopted by police forces. Police firearms training actually teaches the use and discharge of firearms to "remove the threat". Following the September 11, 2001 attacks new guidelines were developed for identifying, confronting, and dealing forcefully with terrorist suspects. These guidelines were given the code name "Operation Kratos".

Based in part on advice from the security forces of Israel and Sri Lanka—two countries with experience of suicide bombings—Operation Kratos guidelines allegedly state that the head or lower limbs should be aimed at when a suspected suicide bomber appears to have no intention of surrendering. This is contrary to the usual practice of aiming at the torso, which presents the biggest target, as a successful hit to the torso may detonate an explosive belt.

Sir Ian Blair appeared on television on 24 July 2005 to accept responsibility for the error on the part of the Metropolitan Police in shooting Jean Charles de Menezes, mistakenly identified as a suicide bomber three days previously, and to acknowledge and defend the policy, saying that "There is no point in shooting at someone's chest because that is where the bomb is likely to be. There is no point in shooting anywhere else if they fall down and detonate it."

[edit] See also

• Anti Terrorist Policies of the British Police
• Shoot-to-kill policy in Northern Ireland

[edit] References

	Wikinews has articles covering the shooting:
Armed police shoot man dead on London Underground Man shot on London Underground unconnected to bombing, says Scotland Yard Leaked documents reveal killed Brazilian was not acting suspiciously Daily Mail: Scotland Yard offered Menezes family US$1m

• [1]