The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article and discuss the issue on the talk page.

An office action is a document written by an examiner in a patent or trademark examination procedure and mailed to an applicant ^[1] for a patent or trademark. The expression is used in many jurisdictions.

Contents 1 United States 1.1 Trademark law 1.2 Patent law 2 References and notes 3 See also 4 External links

[edit] United States

[edit] Trademark law

In United States trademark law, an office action is a rejection of an application to register a trademark issued by an examiner for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)^[2]. Typically, an office action will comprise one or both of two elements. The first element is the category of "informalities", matters such as an inadequate sample to show use of the mark, providing insufficient information with respect to the nature of the entity seeking the mark (for example, failing to name the partners in a partnership), or providing insufficient information for the examiner to determine what, exactly, the goods and services provided by the applicant are.

The second possible element of an office action are actual basis for rejection of the mark itself, the most frequent being likelihood of confusion with an existing registered mark and genericness or descriptiveness of the mark for which registration is sought. Rarely, a mark will be rejected as "immoral or scandalous", usually if it contains sexually suggestive terms, or vulgarities.^{[citation needed]}

When an Office Action is issued, the applicant has six months to respond to the Examiner. If the Office Action was issued with respect to "informalities", the response may simply be the correction of these matters by providing additional information. If the action is premised on a defect in the mark itself, such likelihood of confusion, genericness, or descriptiveness, the applicant may need to present evidence and legal argument to overcome this rejection. If the Examiner is not convinced by the evidence submitted, a Final Office Action will issue. This may be appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. A final office action is also known as a filing refusal.

[edit] Patent law

In United States patent law, an office action is a document written by a patent examiner in response to a patent application after the examiner has examined the application.^[3][4] The office action cites prior art and gives reasons why the examiner has allowed, or approved, the applicant's claims, and/or rejected the claims.

An office action may be "final" or "non-final". In a non-final office action, the applicant is entitled to reply and request reconsideration or further examination, with or without making an amendment. In a final office action, the applicant has two options for reply. In the first option, the applicant may appeal rejection of claims to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Otherwise, the applicant may file an amendment which complies with the requirements set forth in the office action. Reply to a final rejection must include cancellation of, or appeal from the rejection of, each rejected claim. If any claim stands allowed, the reply to a final rejection must comply with any requirements or objections as to form. Replies to final office actions must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. 1.113-1.114.^[5][6][7]

FAOM is an acronym used by the USPTO for "first office action on the merits".

[edit] References and notes

[edit] See also

• Search report
• Manual of Patent Examining Procedure

[edit] External links

• Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) on the USPTO web site
• Trademark information on the USPTO web site