| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Orthodontics > Troy, NY > Dr. Brendan M. Cooney > Contests & Events >... cooneyorthodontics.com | Contests and Events > Contests | Waukesha WI Wisconsin | Davies... daviesortho.com | CUREToday.com - 2010 Extraordinary Healer Award Contest - Contest Rules curetoday.com | Sample Will Clauses pmhf.ca |
A no-contest clause, also called an in terrorem clause, is a clause in a legal document, such as a contract or a will, that is designed to threaten someone, usually with litigation or criminal prosecution, into acting, refraining from action, or ceasing to act. The phrase is typically used to refer to a clause in a will that threatens to disinherit a beneficiary of the will if that beneficiary challenges the terms of the will in court. Many states[1] allow for a Will to have a no contest clause, so long as the person challenging the will doesn't have probable cause to do challenge so.[2]
[edit] No-contest clause in willsThe Uniform Probate Code (UPC) §§ 2-517 and 3‑905 allow for no contest clauses so long as the person challenging the will doesn't have probable cause to do so.[2] The full wording is:
The UPC has been adopted in several smaller states, including Alaska, Idaho, Montana, and New Mexico, but also by Florida, one of the larger states in population.[1] Some states allow for "living probate" and "ante mortem" probate, which are statutory provisions which authorize testators to institute an adversary proceeding during their life to declare the validity of the will, in order to avoid later will contests.[citation needed] [edit] No-contest clauses by state[edit] CaliforniaIn California, no-contest clauses are completely effective, and will divest any party that unsuccessfully contests a will containing such a clause.[citation needed] [edit] FloridaIn Florida no-contest clauses in wills are specifically unenforceable, irrespective of probable cause, pursuant to statute. See Fla. Stat. 733.517 (2009) which states:
[edit] New YorkNew York has rejected the "probable cause" defense to enforcement of such clauses. Such clauses are given full effect upon challenge. Some exceptions apply, e.g. election against the will by a minor, contest on ground of forgery or revocation by later Will.[4] N.Y. EPTL specifically states:
[edit] VirginiaVirginia has generally rejected the "probable cause" defense.[citation needed] [edit] References
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |