| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
About Us: Environmental Policy: Fujirebio environmental health and... fdi.com | Environmental Policy shunyata.co.uk | Review Process for the Canadian Environmental Protection Act nb.lung.ca |
For other uses of "NEPA", see NEPA (disambiguation).
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is a United States environmental law that established a U.S. national policy promoting the enhancement of the environment and also established the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). NEPA's most significant effect was to set up procedural requirements for all federal government agencies to prepare Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). EAs and EISs contain statements of the environmental effects of proposed federal agency actions.[1] NEPA’s procedural requirements apply to all federal agencies in the executive branch. NEPA does not apply to the President, to Congress, or to the federal courts.[2]
[edit] HistoryNEPA came into existence following increased appreciation for the environment, and growing concerns about ecological and wildlife well-being, although still without major impacts on human health; indeed, the public outcry after the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill was perhaps the leading catalyst. An Eisenhower-era Outdoor Recreation report, a Wilderness Act, Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, along with Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring, all reflect the growing concerns, public interest group efforts, and legislative discussion involved.[3] The law has since been applied to any project, federal, state or local, that involves federal funding or work performed by the federal government. Although enacted on January 1, 1970, its "short title" is "National Environmental Policy Act of 1969." [edit] ContentsThe preamble reads:
The law includes two primary sections:
The law establishes the national environmental policy, including a multidisciplinary approach to considering environmental effects in federal government agency decision making. The law also established the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The CEQ prepared the regulations implementing the law that apply to all agencies.[4] Perhaps most notably, the law requires federal agencies to prepare a statement to accompany reports and recommendations for funding from Congress. This document is called an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The definition of actions requiring the EIS includes "major federal actions significantly affecting the human environment." Thus, before implementing any "major" or "significant" or "federal" action, the agency must consider the environmental impacts of that action, identify unavoidable environmental impacts and make this information available to the public in the EIS. All these conditions must be satisfied before implementing the proposed action. A major federal action has been expanded to include most things that a federal agency could prohibit or regulate. In practice, a project is required to meet NEPA guidelines when a federal agency provides any portion of the financing for the project. Sometimes, however, review of a project by a federal employee can be viewed as a federal action and would then, therefore, require NEPA-compliant analyses be performed. NEPA requires that an EIS must include descriptions of:
Federal regulations provide for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to determine whether or not the proposed action fits within the definition of actions that require an EIS. An EA considers the impacts of the proposed action and alternatives. It may conclude with a recommendation to prepare an EIS or it may conclude with a recommendation to prepare a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). An EA must generally include the same contents, but may be briefer. The specific content of an EA is dictated by the specific section of the Code of Federal Regulations relating to the involved federal agency. If more than one federal agency is involved in a particular project, multiple EAs may be required. For example, a project involving both the Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Department of Agriculture will require an EA specific to each federal agency prior to the project's approval. EISs and EAs are environmental documents written under the direction of a federal agency to aid in decision making. They explore feasible alternatives to a proposed action, and the likely environmental consequences of those actions. Congress intended to have NEPA put environmental concerns on par with economic motivations and technological feasibility when making a decision that could affect the environment. Hydrological/geological, biological/ecological, social and health are among the consequences considered. More recently, archeological, historical, cultural impact analyses, and financial management plans for an action have been added to the EIS process. The CEQ has taken strides within the past several years to prepare advisory documentation to explain the general structure of the environmental document, the nature of cumulative impacts and other advisories. The CEQ also maintains a web site that is useful for NEPA information and guidance at www.nepa.gov. [edit] See also
[edit] References
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |