| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Review - Metaphoria: Metaphor and Guided Metaphor for Psychotherapy and... mentalhelp.net | Why Metaphors Motivate Change brooksidecenter.com | Running Out of Metaphors pulsemagazine.org |
This article is about metaphor in literature and rhetoric. For metaphors in cognitive linguistics, see conceptual metaphor. For metaphors in psychotherapy, see therapeutic metaphor. For metaphors in computer science, see interface metaphor.
A metaphor is a figure of speech concisely expressed by comparing two things, saying that one is the other.[1] The English metaphor derives from the 16th c. Old French métaphore, from the Latin metaphora “carrying over”, Greek (μεταφορά) metaphorá “transfer”, [2] from (μεταφέρω) metaphero “to carry over”, “to transfer” [3] and from (μετά) meta “between” [4] + (φέρω) phero, “to bear”, “to carry”.[5] Moreover, metaphor also denotes rhetorical figures of speech that achieve their effects via association, comparison, and resemblance, e.g. antithesis, hyperbole, metonymy, and simile; all are species of metaphor. [6]
[edit] StructureThe Philosophy of Rhetoric (1936), by I. A. Richards, reports that metaphor is in two parts: the tenor and the vehicle. The tenor is the subject to which attributes are ascribed. The vehicle is the subject whose attributes are borrowed. Other writers employ the general terms ground and figure to denote tenor and the vehicle. Consider the All the world's a stage monologue from As You Like It:
In this metaphoric example, "the world" is compared to a stage, describing it with the attributes of “the stage”; "the world" is the tenor, and "a stage" is the vehicle; "men and women" is a secondary tenor, "players" is the secondary vehicle. In cognitive linguistics, the terms target and source correspond to the terms tenor and vehicle. In this nomenclature, metaphors are named with the small-capital typographic convention TARGET IS SOURCE, and all-capitals when small-caps are unavailable; in this notation, the metaphor discussed above would be LIFE IS THEATRE. In a conceptual metaphor, the elements of an extended metaphor constitute the metaphor’s mapping — in the Shakespeare quotation above, exits would be mapped to “death” and entrances mapped to “birth”. a metaphor is comparing two unlike things without using like or as [edit] Types, terms, and categories
A metaphor is more forceful (active) than an analogy, because metaphor asserts two things are the same, whereas analogy acknowledges difference; other rhetorical comparative figures of speech, such as metonymy, parable, simile, and synecdoche, are species of metaphor distinguished by how the comparison is communicated. [7] The metaphor category also contains these specialized types:
[edit] Common types
[edit] Uncommon typesOther types of metaphor have been identified as well, though the nomenclatures are not as universally accepted:
[edit] Use outside of rhetoricThe term metaphor is also used for the following terms that are not a part of rhetoric:
[edit] History in literature and languageMetaphor is present in the oldest written Sumerian language narrative, the Epic of Gilgamesh:
In this example, the friend is compared to a mule, a wild donkey, and a panther to indicate that the speaker sees traits from these animals in his friend (A comparison between two or more unlike objects). The idea of metaphor can be traced back to Aristotle who, in his “Poetics” (around 335 BC), defines “metaphor” as follows: “Metaphor is the application of a strange term either transferred from the genus and applied to the species or from the species and applied to the genus, or from one species to another or else by analogy.”[8] For the sake of clarity and comprehension it might additionally be useful to quote the following two alternative translations: “Metaphor is the application of an alien name by transference either from genus to species, or from species to genus, or from species to species, or by analogy, that is, proportion.”[9] Or, as Halliwell puts it in his translation: “Metaphor is the application of a word that belongs to another thing: either from genus to species, species to genus, species to species, or by analogy.”[10] Therefore, the key aspect of a metaphor is a specific transference of a word from one context into another. With regard to the four kinds of metaphors which Aristotle distincts against each other the last one (transference by analogy) is the most eminent one so that all important theories on metaphor have a reference to this characterization. The Greek plays of Sophocles, Aeschylus, and Euripides, among others, were almost invariably allegorical, showing the tragedy of the protagonists, either to caution the audience metaphorically about temptation, or to lambast famous individuals of the day by inferring similarities with the caricatures in the play. Novelist and essayist Giannina Braschi states, "Metaphors and Similes are the beginning of the democratic system of envy." Even when they are not intentional, they can be drawn between most writing or language and other topics. In this way it can be seen that any theme in literature is a metaphor, using the story to convey information about human perception of the theme in question. [edit] In historical linguisticsIn historical onomasiology or, more generally, in historical linguistics, metaphor is defined as semantic change based on similarity, i.e. a similarity in form or function between the original concept named by a word and the target concept named by this word.[11]
Some recent linguistic theories view language as by its nature all metaphorical; or that language in essence is metaphorical. [12] [edit] Historical theories of metaphor[edit] Metaphor as style in speech and writingViewed as an aspect of speech and writing, metaphor qualifies as style, in particular, style characterized by a type of analogy. An expression (word, phrase) that by implication suggests the likeness of one entity to another entity gives style to an item of speech or writing, whether the entities consist of objects, events, ideas, activities, attributes, or almost anything expressible in language. For example, in the first sentence of this paragraph, the word ´viewed´ serves as a metaphor for ´thought of´, implying analogy of the process of seeing and the thought process. The phrase, "viewed as an aspect of", projects the properties of seeing (vision) something from a particular perspective onto thinking about something from a particular perspective, that ´something´ in this case referring to ´metaphor´ and that ´perspective´ in this case referring to the characteristics of speech and writing. As a characteristic of speech and writing, metaphors can serve the poetic imagination, enabling William Shakespeare, in his play "As You Like It", to compare the world to a stage and its human inhabitants players entering and exiting upon that stage; [13] enabling Sylvia Plath, in her poem "Cut", to compare the blood issuing from her cut thumb to the running of a million soldiers, "redcoats, every one";[14] and, enabling Robert Frost, in "The Road Not Taken", to compare one´s life to a journey. [15] Viewed also as an aspect of speech and writing, metaphor can serve as a device for persuading the listener or reader of the speaker-writer´s argument or thesis, the so-called rhetorical metaphor.... [edit] Metaphor as foundational to our conceptual systemCognitive linguists emphasize that metaphors serve to facilitate the understanding of one conceptual domain, typically an abstract one like 'life' or 'theories' or 'ideas', through expressions that relate to another, more familiar conceptual domain, typically a more concrete one like 'journey' or 'buildings' or 'food'. [16][17] Food for thought: we devour a book of raw facts, try to digest them, stew over them, let them simmer on the back-burner, regurgitate them in discussions, cook up explanations, hoping they do not seem half-baked. Theories as buildings: we establish a foundation for them, a framework, support them with strong arguments, buttressing them with facts, hoping they will stand. Life as journey: some of us travel hopefully, others seem to have no direction, many lose their way.
How does this relate to the nature and importance of our conceptual system, and to metaphor as foundational to our conceptual system? [edit] More Than Just a Figure of SpeechNot only are metaphors a figure of speech, in which a term of phrase is applied to something, but it also has another context. Metaphors are pervasive in everyday life. Not just in language, but also in thought and action. A common definition of a metaphor can be described as a comparison that shows how two things that are not alike in most ways, are similar in another important way. In a book titled Metaphors We Live By, written by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson they describe the essence of a metaphor. They explain how a metaphor is simply understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another. To help better describe this the authors came up with the phrase ‘conduit metaphor.’ With this they meant that a speaker can put ideas or objects into words or containers, and then send them along a channel, or conduit to a listener who take that idea or object out of the container and makes meaning of it. In other words, communication is something that ideas go into. It’s separate from the ideas themselves. In the book the authors have written, they give several examples of daily metaphors in which we use. A couple may be, “argument is war” and “time is money.” One that I have heard many times is “everyday is a holiday.” These metaphors are used in order to help us decipher meanings to certain phrases and words. Often times people understand ideas depending on the context. Metaphors are widely used in context to describe personal meaning. The authors also state how Communication can be viewed as a machine. “Communication is not what one does with the machine, but is the machine itself.” (Johnson, Lakoff, 1980). -Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By (IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980), Chapters 1-3. (pp. 3-13). [edit] See also
[edit] Notes
[edit] References
[edit] External links
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |