Mayhem (crime) Information & Mayhem (crime) Links at HealthHaven.com

Mayhem is an offence under the common law of England and Wales and other common law jurisdictions. In England and Wales, it has fallen into disuse. In 1992 the Law Commission recommended that it be abolished,^[1] and in 1998 the Home Office proposed to abolish it, in the course of codifying the law relating to offences against the person.^[2] It is still in use in California.^[3]

It consisted of the intentional and wanton removal of a body part that would handicap a person's ability to defend himself in combat. Under the strict common law definition, this required damage to an eye or a limb, while cutting off an ear or a nose was deemed not sufficiently disabling. Later the meaning of the crime expanded to encompass any mutilation, disfigurement, or crippling act done using any instrument. The noun "mayhem", and the verb "maim", came from Old French mahaigne.^[4]

[edit] Fetter v. Beale

The most significant revolution in common-law mayhem doctrine came in 1697, when the King's Bench decided Fetter v. Beale, 91 Eng. Rep. 1122. There, the plaintiff recovered in a battery action against a defendant. Shortly thereafter, "part of his skull by reason of the said battery came out of his head," and the plaintiff brought a subsequent action under mayhem. Though Fetter is also known as an early example of res judicata, it is most significant for expanding the ambit of mayhem to include "loss of the skull."

[edit] The modern doctrine

In modern times, the offense of mayhem has been superseded in many jurisdictions by statutorily defined offenses such as aggravated battery.

[edit] References

Edward Coke, Institutes of the Laws of England, Part 3, Chapter 53 (p.118) (1797 ed.) [3] (from Google Books).
Edward Hyde East, Treatise of Pleas of the Crown, Volume 1, Chapter 7 (pp. 392 - 403) (1806 ed.) [4] (from Google Books).
William Hawkins, Treatise of Pleas of the Crown, Book 1, Part 1, Chapter 15, Sections 1 - 12 (pp. 107 - 109) (1824 ed.) [5] (from Google Books).

^ The Law Commission, Consultation Paper No.122, Offences Against the Person and General Principles, Appendix A, Draft Criminal Law Bill, clause 31(1)(a)(iii) at page 90 of the report [1]
^ The Home Office. 1998. Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. [2] Draft Offences Against the Person Bill, clause 23
^ http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-cyclist3-2009nov03,0,761131.story
^ Dictionary.com. (2008). Mayhem. [Online]. Available: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mayhem. (Accessed: 14 August 2008).

John C. Klotter and Terry D. Edwards, Criminal Law, fifth edition (Anderson Publishing: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1998). ISBN 0-87084-527-6.
Barbara Allen Babcok, Toni M. Massaro, and Norman W. Spaulding, Civil Procedure: Cases and Problems (Aspen Publishers: New York, NY 2006). ISBN 0-7355-5620-2.

This article about a criminal law topic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[0] The Law Commission, Consultation Paper No.122, Offences Against the Person and General Principles, Appendix A, Draft Criminal Law Bill, clause 31(1)(a)(iii) at page 90 of the report [1]

[1] The Home Office. 1998. Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. [2] Draft Offences Against the Person Bill, clause 23

[2] ttp://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-cyclist3-2009nov03,0,761131.story

[3] Dictionary.com. (2008). Mayhem. [Online]. Available: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/mayhem. (Accessed: 14 August 2008).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]