Kepler's laws of planetary motion Information & Kepler's laws of planetary motion Links at HealthHaven.com

Figure 1: Illustration of Kepler's three laws with two planetary orbits. (1) The orbits are ellipses, with focal points ƒ₁ and ƒ₂ for the first planetƒ₁ and ƒ₃ for the second planet. The Sun is placed in focal point ƒ₁. (2) The two shaded sectors A₁ and A₂ have the same surface area and the time for planet 1 to cover segment A₁ is equal to the time to cover segment A₂. (3) The total orbit times for planet 1 and planet 2 have a ratio a₁^3/2 : a₂^3/2.

In astronomy, Kepler's three laws of planetary motion describe the orbit of two bodies when the mass of one is negligible compared to the other, such as a planet and its star. Although traditionally formulated in terms the planets of the solar system and the Sun, they apply equally well to many other gravitational systems. In their classic formulation they are:

The orbit of every planet is an ellipse with the Sun at a focus.
A line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time.^[1]
The square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit.

These three mathematical laws were discovered^[2] by German mathematician and astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571–1630), and used by him to describe the motion of planets in the Solar System. They describe the motion of any two bodies orbiting each other.

Kepler worked from the observations of Tycho Brahe, which he published as the Rudolphine tables. Around 1605, Kepler found that Brahe's observations of the planets' positions followed these relatively simple mathematical laws.

Kepler's laws challenged Aristotelean and Ptolemaic astronomy and physics. His assertion that the Earth moved, his use of ellipses rather than epicycles, and his proof that the planets' speeds varied, changed astronomy and physics. Almost a century later Isaac Newton was able to derive Kepler's laws from Newton's own laws of motion and his law of universal gravitation, using classical Euclidean geometry.

In modern times, Kepler's laws are used to calculate approximate orbits for artificial satellites, and bodies orbiting the Sun of which Kepler was unaware (such as the outer planets and smaller asteroids). They apply where any relatively small body is orbiting a larger, relatively massive body, though the effects of atmospheric drag (e.g. in a low orbit), relativity (e.g. Perihelion precession of Mercury), and other nearby bodies can make the results insufficiently accurate for a specific purpose.

[edit] Introduction to the three laws

[edit] Generality

These laws describe the motion of any two bodies in orbit around each other. The masses of the two bodies can be nearly equal, e.g. Charon—Pluto (~1:10), in a small proportion, e.g. Moon—Earth (~1:100), or in a great proportion, e.g. Mercury—Sun (~1:10,000,000).

In all cases, rotation is about the barycenter of the two bodies, with neither one having their center of mass exactly at one focus of an ellipse. However, both orbits are ellipses with one focus at the barycenter. When the ratio of masses is large, e.g., with planets orbiting the Sun, the barycenter is deep within the larger object, close to its center of mass. In this case it requires sophisticated precision measurements to detect the separation of the barycenter from the center of mass of the larger object. Thus Kepler's first law accurately describes the orbits of the planets around the Sun under classical physics.

Since Kepler stated these laws as they apply to the Sun and the planets, and did not know of their generality, this article discusses these laws as they apply to the Sun and its planets.

[edit] First law

Figure 2: Kepler's first law placing the Sun at the focus of an elliptical orbit

"The orbit of every planet is an ellipse with the Sun at a focus."

Symbolically:

$r=\frac{p}{1+\varepsilon\, \cos\theta}$

where (r, θ) are heliocentric polar coordinates for the planet, p is the semi-latus rectum, and ε is the eccentricity.

At the time, this was a radical claim; the prevailing belief (particularly in epicycle-based theories) was that orbits should be based on perfect circles. This observation was very significant at the time as it supported the Copernican view of the Universe. This does not mean it loses relevance in a more modern context. A circle is just one form of an ellipse, but most of the planets follow an orbit of low eccentricity, meaning that they can be crudely approximated as circles. So it is not evident from the orbit of the planets that the orbits are indeed elliptic. However, Kepler's calculations proved they were, which also allowed for other heavenly bodies farther away from the Sun with highly eccentric orbits (like very long stretched out circles). These other heavenly bodies indeed have been identified as the numerous comets or asteroids by astronomers after Kepler's time. The dwarf planet Pluto was discovered as late as 1929, the delay mostly due to its small size and its highly elongated orbit compared to the other planets. Nevertheless, heavenly bodies such as comets with parabolic or even hyperbolic orbits are possible under the Newtonian theory and have been observed.^[3]

[edit] Second law

Figure 3: Illustration of Kepler's second law. The planet moves faster near the Sun, so the same area is swept out in a given time as at larger distances, where the planet moves more slowly.

"The line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time."^[1]

Symbolically:

$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{2}r^2 \dot\theta\right) = 0,$

where $\tfrac{1}{2}r^2 \dot\theta$ is the "areal velocity".

This is also known as the law of equal areas. To understand this let us suppose a planet takes one day to travel from point A to point B. The lines from the Sun to points A and B, together with the planet orbit, will define an (roughly triangular) area. This same area will be covered every day regardless of where in its orbit the planet is. Now as the first law states that the planet follows an ellipse, the planet is at different distances from the Sun at different parts in its orbit. This leads to the conclusion that the planet has to move faster when it is closer to the Sun so that it sweeps an equal area.

Kepler's second law is an additional observation on top of his first law. It is equivalent to the fact that the net tangential force involved in an elliptical orbit, as per his first law, is zero. The "areal velocity" is proportional to angular momentum, and so for the same reasons, Kepler's second law is also a statement of the conservation of angular momentum.

[edit] Third law

Published by Kepler in 1619 [1] this captures the relationship between the distance of planets from the Sun, and their orbital periods. Specifically, it states that:

"The square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit."

Symbolically:

${P^2} \propto {a^3}$

where $P$ is the orbital period of planet and $a$ is the semimajor axis of the orbit.

The proportionality constant is the same for any planet around the Sun.

$\frac{P_{\rm planet}^2}{a_{\rm planet}^3} = \frac{P_{\rm earth}^2}{a_{\rm earth}^3}.$

So the constant is 1 (sidereal year)²(astronomical unit)⁻³ or 2.97472505×10⁻¹⁹ s²m⁻³. See the actual figures: attributes of major planets.

For example, suppose planet A is four times as far from the Sun as planet B. Then planet A must traverse four times the distance of Planet B each orbit, and moreover it turns out that planet A travels at half the speed of planet B, this last taking into account the equilibrium of centripetal force that stablishes object in stable orbit, this compensation is needed for a release 4² in gravitational attraction force diminished by the centripetal radius factor (4), so that linear speed goes to the square root of 4 (2). In total it takes 4×2=8 times as long for planet A to travel an orbit, in agreement with the law (8²=4³).

This law used to be known as the harmonic law^[4], because Kepler enunciated it in a laborious attempt to determine what he viewed as "the music of the spheres" according to precise laws, and express it in terms of musical notation.^[5]

This law currently receives additional attention as it can be used to estimate exoplanetary orbital radius as to know the distance of planets to its respective central star, and help to decide if this distance is inside habitable zone of the corresponding star.^[6]. The concrete, generic formula, would be:

d [A U] 3 = P [y e a r s] 2 * M [S o l a r M a s s e s]

[edit] Zero eccentricity

Kepler's laws refine upon the model of Copernicus. If the eccentricity of a planetary orbit is zero, then Kepler's laws state:

The planetary orbit is a circle with the Sun in the center.
The speed of the planet in the orbit is constant
The square of the sidereal period is proportionate to the cube of the distance from the Sun.

Actually the eccentricities of the orbits of the six planets known to Copernicus and Kepler are quite small, so this gives excellent approximations to the planetary motions, but Kepler's laws give even better fit to the observations.

Because the uniform circular motion was considered to be normal, a deviation from this motion was considered an anomaly. Kepler's corrections to the Copernican model are not at all obvious:

The planetary orbit is not a circle, but an ellipse, and the Sun is not in the center of the orbit, but in a focal point.
Neither the speed nor the angular speed of the planet in the orbit is constant, but the area speed is constant.
The square of the sidereal period is proportionate to the cube of the mean between the maximum and minimum distances from the Sun.

The time from the March equinox to the September equinox is around 186 days, while the time from the September equinox to the March equinox is only around 179 days. This elementary observation shows, using Kepler's laws, that the eccentricity of the orbit of the earth is not exactly zero. The intersection between the plane of the equator and the plane of the ecliptic cuts the orbit into two parts having areas in the proportion 186 to 179, while a diameter cuts the orbit into equal parts. So the eccentricity of the orbit of the Earth is approximately

$\varepsilon\approx\frac \pi 4 \frac {186-179}{186+179}\approx 0.015$

which is close to the correct value. (See Earth's orbit).

[edit] Nonzero planetary mass

The acceleration of a planet moving according to Kepler's laws can be shown to be directed towards the Sun, and the magnitude of the acceleration is in inverse proportion to the square of the distance from the Sun. Isaac Newton assumed that all bodies in the universe attract one another with a force of gravitation. As the planets have small masses compared to that of the Sun, the orbits obey Kepler's laws approximately. Newton's model improves Kepler's model to give better fit to the observations.

Deviations from Kepler's laws due to attraction from other planets are called perturbations.

The proportionality constant in Kepler's third law is related to the masses according to the following expression:^[7]

$\left({\frac{P}{2\pi}}\right)^2 = {a^3 \over G (M+m)},$

where P is time per orbit and P/2π is time per radian. $G$ is the gravitational constant, $M$ is the mass of the Sun, $m$ is the mass of the planet, and $a$ is the length of the semi-major axis of the orbit. The difference between Kepler's constant for Jupiter and that for Earth, due to the mass of Jupiter, is approximately a tenth of a percent. (See data tabulated at Planet attributes).

[edit] Conversions for "Unknown"

$4π 2 a 3 = P 2 G (M + m)$
$P= \left({ {4\pi^2} {a^3} \over G (M+m) }\right)^{0.5}$

$M = {\left( {{4\pi^2} a^3 \over G {P^2}}\right) - m }$

[edit] Position as a function of time

Kepler used these three laws for computing the position of a planet as a function of time. His method involves the solution of a transcendental equation called Kepler's equation.

[edit] Mathematics of the ellipse

Main article: Ellipse

Figure 4: Heliocentric coordinate system (r, θ) for ellipse. Also shown are: semi-major axis a, semi-minor axis b and semi-latus rectum p; center of ellipse and its two foci marked by large dots. For θ = 0°, r = r_min and for θ = 180°, r = r_max.

In the ellipse equation

$r=\frac{p}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos\theta}$

(r, θ) are polar coordinates, p is the semi-latus rectum, and ε is the eccentricity. (see figure 4).

At θ = 0 is the minimum distance is

$r_\mathrm{min}=\frac{p}{1+\varepsilon}.$

At θ = 90° the distance is $\, p.$ .

At θ = 180° the maximum distance is

$r_\mathrm{max}=\frac{p}{1-\varepsilon}.$

The semi-major axis is the arithmetic mean between r_min and r_max:

$a= \frac{r_{\rm min}+r_{\rm max}}{2} =\frac{p}{1-\varepsilon^2}.$

The semi-minor axis is the geometric mean between r_min and r_max:

$b=\sqrt{r_{\rm min}r_{\rm max}} =\frac p{\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2}}.$

The area of the ellipse is

$A=\pi a b\,.$

The special case of a circle is ε = 0, resulting in r = p = r_min = r_max = a = b and A = π r ².

[edit] Summary

Using these ellipse-related terms, Kepler's procedure for calculating the heliocentric polar coordinates (r,θ) to a planetary position as a function of the time t since perihelion, and the orbital period P, is the following four steps.

1. Compute the mean anomaly M from the formula

$M=\frac{2\pi t}{P}$

2. Compute the eccentric anomaly E by numerically solving Kepler's equation:

$\ M=E-\varepsilon\cdot\sin E$

3. Compute the true anomaly θ by the equation:

$\tan\frac \theta 2 = \sqrt{\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}}\cdot\tan\frac E 2$

4. Compute the heliocentric distance r from the first law:

$r=\frac p {1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos\theta}$

The important special case of circular orbit, ε = 0, gives simply $θ$ = E = M.

The proof of this procedure is shown below.

[edit] Details and proof

FIgure 5: Geometric construction for Kepler's calculation of θ. The Sun (located at the focus) is labeled S and the planet P. The auxiliary circle is an aid to calculation. Line xd is perpendicular to the base and through the planet P. The shaded sectors are arranged to have equal areas by positioning of point y.

The Keplerian problem assumes an elliptical orbit and the four points:

s the Sun (at one focus of ellipse);

z the perihelion

c the center of the ellipse

p the planet

and

$\ a=|cz|,$ distance between center and perihelion, the semimajor axis,

$\ \varepsilon={|cs|\over a},$ the eccentricity,

$\ b=a\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2},$ the semiminor axis,

$\ r=|sp| ,$ the distance between Sun and planet.

$\theta=\angle zsp,$ the direction to the planet as seen from the Sun, the true anomaly.

The problem is to compute the polar coordinates (r,θ) of the planet from the time since perihelion, t.

It is solved in steps. Kepler considered the circle with the major axis as a diameter, and

$\ x,$ the projection of the planet to the auxiliary circle

$\ y,$ the point on the circle such that the sector areas |zcy| and |zsx| are equal,

$M=\angle zcy,$ the mean anomaly.

The sector areas are related by $|zsp|=\frac b a \cdot|zsx|.$

The circular sector area $\ |zcy| = \frac{a^2 M}2.$

The area swept since perihelion,

$|zsp|=\frac b a \cdot|zsx|=\frac b a \cdot|zcy|=\frac b a\cdot\frac{a^2 M}2$ $= \frac {a b M}{2}$ ,

is by Kepler's second law proportional to time since perihelion. So the mean anomaly, M, is proportional to time since perihelion, t.

$M={2 \pi t \over P},$

where P is the orbital period.

The mean anomaly M is first computed. The goal is to compute the true anomaly θ. The function θ=f(M) is, however, not elementary. Kepler's solution is to use

$E=\angle zcx$ , x as seen from the centre, the eccentric anomaly

as an intermediate variable, and first compute E as a function of M by solving Kepler's equation below, and then compute the true anomaly θ from the eccentric anomaly E. Here are the details.

$\ |zcy|=|zsx|=|zcx|-|scx|$

$\frac{a^2 M}2=\frac{a^2 E}2-\frac {a\varepsilon\cdot a\sin E}2$

Division by a²/2 gives Kepler's equation

$M=E-\varepsilon\cdot\sin E.$

The catch is that Kepler's equation cannot be rearranged to isolate E. The function E = f(M) is not an elementary formula, but Kepler's equation is solved either iteratively by a root-finding algorithm or, as derived in the article on eccentric anomaly, by an infinite series.

Having computed the eccentric anomaly E from Kepler's equation, the next step is to calculate the true anomaly θ from the eccentric anomaly E.

Note from the figure that

$\overrightarrow{cd}=\overrightarrow{cs}+\overrightarrow{sd}$

so that

$a\cdot\cos E=a\cdot\varepsilon+r\cdot\cos \theta.$

Dividing by $a$ and inserting from Kepler's first law

$\ \frac r a =\frac{1-\varepsilon^2}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}$

to get

$\cos E =\varepsilon+\frac{1-\varepsilon^2}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}\cdot\cos \theta$ $=\frac{\varepsilon\cdot(1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta)+(1-\varepsilon^2)\cdot\cos \theta}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}$ $=\frac{\varepsilon +\cos \theta}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}.$

The result is a usable relationship between the eccentric anomaly E and the true anomaly θ.

A computationally more convenient form follows by substituting into the trigonometric identity:

$\tan^2\frac{x}{2}=\frac{1-\cos x}{1+\cos x}.$

Get

$\tan^2\frac{E}{2} =\frac{1-\cos E}{1+\cos E}$ $=\frac{1-\frac{\varepsilon+\cos \theta}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}}{1+\frac{\varepsilon+\cos \theta}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}}$ $=\frac{(1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta)-(\varepsilon+\cos \theta)}{(1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta)+(\varepsilon+\cos \theta)}$ $=\frac{1-\varepsilon}{1+\varepsilon}\cdot\frac{1-\cos \theta}{1+\cos \theta}=\frac{1-\varepsilon}{1+\varepsilon}\cdot\tan^2\frac{\theta}{2}.$

Multiplying by (1+ε)/(1−ε) and taking the square root gives the result

$\tan\frac \theta2=\sqrt\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}\cdot\tan\frac E2.$

We have now completed the third step in the connection between time and position in the orbit.

One could even develop a series computing θ directly from M. [2]

The fourth step is to compute the heliocentric distance r from the true anomaly θ by Kepler's first law:

$\ r=a\cdot\frac{1-\varepsilon^2}{1+\varepsilon\cdot\cos \theta}.$

[edit] Derivation from Newton's laws of motion and Newton's law of gravitation

Kepler's laws are concerned with the motion of the planets around the Sun. Newton's laws of motion in general are concerned with the motion of objects subject to impressed forces. Newton's law of universal gravitation describes how masses attract each other through the force of gravity. Using the law of gravitation to determine the impressed forces in Newton's laws of motion enables the calculation of planetary orbits, as discussed below.

In the special case where there are only two particles, the motion of the bodies is the exactly soluble two-body problem, of which an approximate example is the motion of a planet around the Sun according to Kepler's laws, as shown below. The trajectory of the lighter particle may also be a parabola or a hyperbola or a straight line.

In the case of a single planet orbiting its Sun, Newton's laws imply elliptical motion. The focus of the ellipse is at the center of mass of the Sun and the planet (the barycenter), rather than located at the center of the Sun itself. The period of the orbit depends a little on the mass of the planet. In the realistic case of many planets, the interaction from other planets modifies the orbit of any one planet. Even in this more complex situation, the language of Kepler's laws applies as the complicated orbits are described as simple Kepler orbits with slowly varying orbital elements. See also Kepler problem in general relativity.

While Kepler's laws are expressed either in geometrical language, or as equations connecting the coordinates of the planet and the time variable with the orbital elements, Newton's second law is a differential equation. So the derivations below involve the art of solving differential equations. Kepler's second law is derived first, as the derivation of the first law depends on the derivation of the second law. The derivations that follow use heliocentric polar coordinates, that is, polar coordinates with the Sun as the origin. See Figure 4. However, they can alternatively be formulated and derived using Cartesian coordinates.^[8]

[edit] Equations of motion

Assume that the planet is so much lighter than the Sun that the acceleration of the Sun can be neglected. In other words, the barycenter is approximated as the center of the Sun. Introduce the polar coordinate system in the plane of the orbit, with radial coordinate from the Sun's center, r and angle from some arbitrary starting direction θ.

Newton's law of gravitation says that "every object in the universe attracts every other object along a line of the centers of the objects, proportional to each object's mass, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects," and his second law of motion says that "the mass times the acceleration is equal to the force." So the mass of the planet times the acceleration vector of the planet equals the mass of the Sun times the mass of the planet, divided by the square of the distance, times minus the radial unit vector $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ , times a constant of proportionality. This is written:

$m\ddot\mathbf{r} = -\frac{G M m}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}$

where a dot on top of the variable signifies differentiation with respect to time, the second dot indicates the second derivative, and the position vector $\mathbf{r} = r \hat{\mathbf{r}}$ .

In polar coordinates, as discussed in Vector calculus and Polar coordinates in an inertial frame of reference

$\dot\hat{\mathbf{r}} = \dot\theta \hat{\boldsymbol\theta}, \qquad \dot\hat{\boldsymbol\theta} = -\dot\theta \hat{\mathbf{r}}$

where $\hat{\boldsymbol\theta}$ is the tangential (azimuthal) unit vector orthogonal to $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ and pointing in the direction of rotation, and $θ$ is the polar angle.

So differentiating the position vector $\mathbf{r} = r \hat{\mathbf{r}}$ twice to obtain the velocity and the acceleration vectors:

$\dot\mathbf{r} =\dot r \hat\mathbf{r} + r \dot\hat\mathbf{r} =\dot r \hat{\mathbf{r}} + r \dot\theta \hat{\boldsymbol\theta},$

$\ddot\mathbf{r} = (\ddot r \hat{\mathbf{r}} +\dot r \dot\hat{\mathbf{r}} ) + (\dot r\dot\theta \hat{\boldsymbol\theta} + r\ddot\theta \hat{\boldsymbol\theta} + r\dot\theta \dot\hat{\boldsymbol\theta}) = (\ddot r - r\dot\theta^2) \hat{\mathbf{r}} + (r\ddot\theta + 2\dot r \dot\theta) \hat{\boldsymbol\theta}.$

Note that for constant distance, $\ r$ , the planet is subject to the centripetal acceleration, $r\dot\theta^2$ , and for constant angular speed, $\dot\theta$ , the planet is subject to the Coriolis acceleration, $2\dot r \dot\theta$ .^[9]

Inserting the acceleration vector into Newton's laws, and dividing by m, gives the vector equation of motion

$(\ddot r - r\dot\theta^2) \hat{\mathbf{r}} + (r\ddot\theta + 2\dot r \dot\theta) \hat{\boldsymbol\theta}= -GMr^{-2}\hat{\mathbf{r}}$

Equating components, we get the two ordinary differential equations of motion, one for the acceleration in the $\hat{\mathbf r}$ direction, the radial acceleration

$\ddot r - r\dot\theta^2 = -GMr^{-2},$

and one for the acceleration in the $\hat{\boldsymbol\theta}$ direction, the tangential or azimuthal acceleration:

$r\ddot\theta + 2\dot r\dot\theta = 0.$

[edit] Deriving Kepler's second law

In order to derive Kepler's second law only the tangential acceleration equation is needed.

The magnitude of the specific angular momentum

$\ell = r^2 \dot \theta$

is a constant of motion, even if both the distance $\ r$ , and the angular speed $\dot\theta$ , and the tangential velocity $r \dot \theta$ , vary, because

$\frac{d\ell}{dt} =\frac{d(r^2 \dot \theta)}{dt} = r^2 \ddot \theta+2r \dot r\dot \theta=r(r \ddot \theta+2\dot r \dot \theta)=0$

where the expression in the last parentheses vanishes due to the tangential acceleration equation.

The area swept out from time t₁ to time t₂,

$\ \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\frac 1 2 \cdot {\rm base}\cdot d({\rm height}) = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\frac 1 2 \cdot r\cdot r\dot \theta dt=\frac 1 2 \cdot\ell \cdot(t_2-t_1)$

depends only on the duration t₂−t₁. This is Kepler's second law.

[edit] Deriving Kepler's first law

In order to derive Kepler's first law define

$\ u =pr^{-1}\,$

where the constant

$p=\ell ^2 G^{-1}M^{-1}\,$

has the dimension of length. Then

$GMr^{-2}=\ell^2 p^{-3}u^{2}$

and

$\ \dot \theta =\ell r^{-2}=\ell p^{-2}u^2.$

Differentiation with respect to time is transformed into differentiation with respect to angle:

$\ \dot X=\frac {dX}{dt}=\frac {dX}{d\theta}\cdot\frac {d\theta}{dt}=\frac {dX}{d \theta}\cdot \dot\theta=\frac {dX}{d \theta}\cdot\ell p^{-2}u^2.$

Differentiate

$\ r =pu^{-1}$

twice:

$\dot r = \frac{d(pu^{-1})}{d\theta}\cdot\ell p^{-2}u^{2} = -pu^{-2}\frac{du}{d\theta}\cdot\ell p^{-2}u^{2}= -\ell p^{-1}\frac{du}{d\theta}$

$\ddot r = \frac{d\dot r}{d\theta}\cdot\ell p^{-2}u^{2} = \frac{d}{d\theta}\left(-\ell p^{-1} \frac{du}{d\theta}\right)\cdot\ell p^{-2}u^{2} = -\ell^2 p^{-3}u^{2}\frac{d^2 u}{d\theta^2}$

Substitute into the radial equation of motion

$\ddot r - r\dot\theta^2 = -GMr^{-2}$

and get

$\left(-\ell^2 p^{-3}u^2\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2}\right) - (pu^{-1})(\ell p^{-2}u^2)^2 = -\ell ^2 p^{-3} u^2$

Divide by $-\ell^2 p^{-3}u^2$ to get a simple non-homogeneous linear differential equation for the orbit of the planet:

$\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} + u = 1 .$

An obvious solution to this equation is the circular orbit

$\ u = 1.$

Other solutions are obtained by adding solutions to the homogeneous linear differential equation with constant coefficients

$\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} + u = 0$

These solutions are

$\ u = \varepsilon\cdot\cos(\theta-\theta_0)$

where $\ \varepsilon$ and $\theta_0\,$ are arbitrary constants of integration. So the result is

$\ u = 1+ \varepsilon\cdot\cos(\theta-\theta_0)$

Choosing the axis of the coordinate system such that $\ \theta_0=0$ , and inserting $\ u=pr^{-1}$ , gives:

$\ pr^{-1 } = 1+ \varepsilon\cdot\cos\theta .$

If $\ |{ \varepsilon}|<1 ,$ this is Kepler's first law.

[edit] Deriving Kepler's third law

In the special case of circular orbits, which are ellipses with zero eccentricity, the relation between the radius a of the orbit and its period P can be derived relatively easily. The centripetal force of circular motion is proportional to a/P², and it is provided by the gravitational force, which is proportional to 1/a². Hence,

$P^2 \propto a^3$

which is Kepler's third law for the special case.

In the general case of elliptical orbits, the derivation is more complicated.

The area of the planetary orbit ellipse is

$A=\pi a b=\pi a(a\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2})=\pi a^2\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2}\, .$

The area speed of the radius vector sweeping the orbit area is

$\dot A=\ell/ 2 \,$

where

$\ell^2=pGM=a(1-\varepsilon^2)GM \,.$

The period of the orbit is

$P=\frac A \dot A =\frac {\pi a^2\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2}}{\ell/2}=2\pi\frac {a^2\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2}}{\ell}\,$

satisfying

$\left(\frac P{2 \pi}\right)^2=\left( \frac {a^2\sqrt{1-\varepsilon^2}}{\ell}\right)^2 = \frac {a^4(1-\varepsilon^2)}{\ell^2} = \frac {a^4(1-\varepsilon^2)}{a(1-\varepsilon^2)GM }=\frac{a^3}{GM}\,$

implying Kepler's third law

$P^2 \propto a^3 \ .$

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

^ ^a ^b Kepler's Second Law by Jeff Bryant with Oleksandr Pavlyk, Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
^ Gerald James Holton, Stephen G. Brush (2001). Physics, the Human Adventure. Rutgers University Press. Chapter 4. ISBN 0813529085. http://books.google.com/books?id=czaGZzR0XOUC&pg=PA45&dq=Kepler+%22harmonic+law%22&lr=&as_brr=0#PPA40,M1.
^ Dunbar, Brian (2008), SECCHI Makes a Fantastic Recovery!, NASA, http://erc.ivv.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/SECCHI_P2003.html
^ Gerald James Holton, Stephen G. Brush (2001). Physics, the Human Adventure. Rutgers University Press. p. 45. ISBN 0813529085. http://books.google.com/books?id=czaGZzR0XOUC&pg=PA45&dq=Kepler+%22harmonic+law%22&lr=&as_brr=0.
^ Burtt, Edwin. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. p. 52.
^ http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu/undergrad/Labs/extrasolar_planets/pn_intro.html
^ Gerald James Holton, Stephen G. Brush (2001). Physics, the Human Adventure. Rutgers University Press. p. 136. ISBN 0813529085. http://books.google.com/books?id=czaGZzR0XOUC&pg=PA45&dq=Kepler+%22harmonic+law%22&lr=&as_brr=0#PPA136,M1.
^ Hyman, Andrew. "A Simple Cartesian Treatment of Planetary Motion", European Journal of Physics, Vol. 14, pp. 145–147 (1993).
^ Although this term is called the "Coriolis acceleration", or the "Coriolis force per unit mass", it should be noted that the term "Coriolis force" as used in meteorology, for example, refers to something different: namely the force, similar in mathematical form, but caused by rotation of a frame of reference. Of course, in the example here of planetary motion, the entire analysis takes place in a stationary, inertial frame, so there is no force present related to rotation of a frame of reference.

[edit] References

Kepler's life is summarized on pages 627–623 and Book Five of his magnum opus, Harmonice Mundi (harmonies of the world), is reprinted on pages 635–732 of On the Shoulders of Giants: The Great Works of Physics and Astronomy (works by Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, and Einstein). Stephen Hawking, ed. 2002 ISBN 0-7624-1348-4

A derivation of Kepler's third law of planetary motion is a standard topic in engineering mechanics classes. See, for example, pages 161–164 of Meriam, J. L. (1966, 1971), Dynamics, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley, ISBN 0-471-59601-9 .

Murray and Dermott, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge University Press 1999, ISBN 0-521-57597-4

[edit] External links

B.Surendranath Reddy; animation of Kepler's laws: applet
Crowell, Benjamin, Conservation Laws, http://www.lightandmatter.com/area1book2.html, an online book that gives a proof of the first law without the use of calculus. (see section 5.2, p. 112)
David McNamara and Gianfranco Vidali, Kepler's Second Law - Java Interactive Tutorial, http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/java/mc_html/kepler.html, an interactive Java applet that aids in the understanding of Kepler's Second Law.
University of Tennessee's Dept. Physics & Astronomy: Astronomy 161 page on Johannes Kepler: The Laws of Planetary Motion [3]
Equant compared to Kepler: interactive model [4]
Kepler's Third Law:interactive model[5]