Taxation in the United States
This article is part of a series on Taxation
Federal taxation
Authority · History Internal Revenue Service Court • Forms • Code • Revenue Taxpayer standing
Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax · Gift tax Corporate tax · Capital gains tax
State & local taxation
State income tax · State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax · Property tax  · Land value tax
Federal tax reform Automated payment transaction tax Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income Hall-Rabushka flat tax Real Property Use Tax Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax · Value Added Tax FairTax · Flat tax
Tax protesting History America: Freedom to Fascism The Law that Never Was Cheek v. United States Notable tax protesters Irwin Schiff Richard Michael Simkanin Robert Clarkson · Tom Cryer Vivien Kellems Wayne C. Bentson Wesley Snipes
Tax protester arguments: Constitutional · 16th Amendment Statutory · Conspiracy
Taxation by country Australia • British Virgin Islands Canada • China • Colombia France • Germany • Hong Kong India • Indonesia • Ireland Netherlands • New Zealand Peru • Russia • Singapore Switzerland • Tanzania Thailand • United Kingdom United States • European Union v • d • e Tax rates around the world Tax revenue as % of GDP
view • talk • edit

The Interstate Income Act of 1959, also known as Public Law 86-272,^[1] is a United States statute that allows a business to go, or send representatives, into a state to solicit orders for goods without being subject to a net income tax.^[2] It is currently codified at 15 U.S.C. § 381–384.

Contents 1 History 2 Provisions of the Act 2.1 Personal property 2.2 Solicitation 2.3 Exclusions 3 References 4 External links

[edit] History

Public Law 86-272 was enacted in response to outcries from business over the decision held in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 (1959).^[3] In Northwestern States, the Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a Minnesota tax on an Iowa corporation that solicited orders and maintained a leased office in Minnesota.^[4] However, the Court did not make clear whether the maintenance of employees in the state (who solicited orders that were delivered and accepted outside the state) would have been enough to give rise to the state’s power to impose its tax.

Public Law 86-272 addressed that circumstance by acting as a 'stopgap'^[5] by restricting a state from collecting income tax on solicited sales within its borders, as long as the orders are filled or shipped outside of the state.^[2]

[edit] Provisions of the Act

[edit] Personal property

Public Law 86-272 protects only solicitation of orders for tangible personal property.^[5]

[edit] Solicitation

Protection applies to activities that are limited to:

• Solicitation by employees of orders that are approved outside the state and shipped from outside the state.^[2]
• Solicitation by independent contractors if the sales are shipped from outside the state.^[6]

[edit] Exclusions

Public Law 86-272 does not protect a corporation in the state where it is incorporated.^[7] Likewise, it does not protect sellers of services or intangibles. In addition, it provides protection only from taxes measured by income. Taxes measured by net worth or gross receipts, or sales and use taxes, are not covered.^[8]

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Title 15, Chapter 10B, Subchapter I--current text of the Act from the Legal Information Institute