Hooke's law Information & Hooke's law Links at HealthHaven.com

	Continuum mechanics
Laws
	Conservation of mass; Conservation of momentum; Conservation of energy; Entropy inequality
Solid mechanics
	Solids · Stress · Deformation · Finite strain theory · Infinitesimal strain theory · Elasticity · Linear elasticity · Plasticity · Viscoelasticity · Hooke's law · Rheology
Fluid mechanics
	Fluids · Fluid statics; Fluid dynamics · Viscosity · Newtonian fluids; Non-Newtonian fluids; Surface tension
Scientists
	Newton · Stokes · Navier · Cauchy· Hooke · Bernoulli
	This box: view • talk • edit

Hooke's law accurately models the physical properties of common mechanical springs for small changes in length

In mechanics, and physics, Hooke's law of elasticity is an approximation that states that the extension of a spring is in direct proportion with the load added to it as long as this load does not exceed the elastic limit. Materials for which Hooke's law is a useful approximation are known as linear-elastic or "Hookean" materials.

Mathematically, Hooke's law states that

$\mathbf{F}=-k\mathbf{x},$

where

x is the displacement of the end of the spring from its equilibrium position;

F is the restoring force exerted by the material; and

k is the force constant (or spring constant).

When this holds, the behavior is said to be linear. If shown on a graph, the line should show a direct variation. There is a negative sign on the right hand side of the equation because the restoring force always acts in the opposite direction of the displacement (for example, when a spring is stretched to the left, it pulls back to the right).

Hooke's law is named after the 17th century British physicist Robert Hooke. He first stated this law in 1676 as a Latin anagram,^[1] whose solution he published in 1678 as Ut tensio, sic vis, meaning, "As the extension, so the force".

[edit] Elastic materials

Objects that quickly regain their original shape after being deformed by a force, with the molecules or atoms of their material returning to the initial state of stable equilibrium, often obey Hooke's law.

We may view a rod of any elastic material as a linear spring. The rod has length L and cross-sectional area A. Its extension (strain) is linearly proportional to its tensile stress, σ by a constant factor, the inverse of its modulus of elasticity, E, hence,

$\sigma = E \varepsilon$

or

$\Delta L = \frac{F}{E A} L = \frac{\sigma}{E} L.$

Hooke's law only holds for some materials under certain loading conditions. Steel exhibits linear-elastic behavior in most engineering applications; Hooke's law is valid for it throughout its elastic range (i.e., for stresses below the yield strength). For some other materials, such as aluminium, Hooke's law is only valid for a portion of the elastic range. For these materials a proportional limit stress is defined, below which the errors associated with the linear approximation are negligible.

Rubber is generally regarded as a "non-hookean" material because its elasticity is stress dependent and sensitive to temperature and loading rate.

Applications of the law include spring operated weighing machines, stress analysis and modeling of materials.

[edit] The spring equation

Stress–strain curve for low-carbon steel. Hooke's law is only valid for the portion of the curve between the origin and the yield point(2).
1. Ultimate strength
2. Yield strength-corresponds to yield point.
3. Rupture
4. Strain hardening region
5. Necking region. A: Apparent stress (F/A₀)
B: True stress (F/A)

The most commonly encountered form of Hooke's law is probably the spring equation, which relates the force exerted by a spring to the distance it is stretched by a spring constant, k, measured in force per length.

$F=-kx\,$

The negative sign indicates that the force exerted by the spring is in direct opposition to the direction of displacement. It is called a "restoring force", as it tends to restore the system to equilibrium. The potential energy stored in a spring is given by

$U={1\over2}kx^2$

which comes from adding up the energy it takes to incrementally compress the spring. That is, the integral of force over distance. (Note that potential energy of a spring is always non-negative.)

This potential can be visualized as a parabola on the U-x plane. As the spring is stretched in the positive x-direction, the potential energy increases (the same thing happens as the spring is compressed). The corresponding point on the potential energy curve is higher than that corresponding to the equilibrium position (x = 0). The tendency for the spring is to therefore decrease its potential energy by returning to its equilibrium (unstretched) position, just as a ball rolls downhill to decrease its gravitational potential energy.

If a mass m is attached to the end of such a spring, the system becomes a harmonic oscillator. It will oscillate with a natural frequency given either as an angular frequency

$\omega = \sqrt{k \over m}$

or as a frequency

$\nu = {1 \over 2 \pi} \sqrt{k \over m}.$

[edit] Multiple springs

or

When two springs are attached to a mass and compressed, the following table compares values of the springs.

Comparison	In Series	In Parallel

Equivalent spring constant	$\frac{1}{k_{eq}} = \frac{1}{k_1} + \frac{1}{k_2} \,$	$k_{eq} = k_1 + k_2 \,$
Compressed distance	$\frac{x_1}{x_2} = \frac{k_2}{k_1} \,$	$x_1 = x_2 \,$
Energy stored	$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{k_2}{k_1} \,$	$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{k_1}{k_2} \,$

[edit] Derivation

Equivalent Spring Constant (Series)

Deriving

k e q

in the series case is a little trickier than in the parallel case. Defining the equilibrium position of the block to be x₂, we'll be looking for an equation for the force on the block that looks like:

$F_b = -k_{eq} x_2 .\,$

To begin, we'll also define the equilibrium position of the point between the two springs to be x₁.

The force on the block is

$F_b = - k_2 \left( x_2 - x_1 \right). \quad \quad \quad (1) \,$

Meanwhile, the force on the point between the two springs is

$F_s = - k_1 x_1 + k_2 (x_2 - x_1). \,$

Now, when the block is pushed so the springs are compressed and the system is allowed to come to equilibrium, the force between the springs must sum to zero, so with $F s = 0$ we can solve for $x_1 \,$ :

$- k_1 x_1 + k_2 (x_2 - x_1) = 0 \,$

$- k_1 x_1 - k_2 x_1 = -k_2 x_2 \,$

$\left(k_1 + k_2 \right) x_1 = k_2 x_2 \,$

so

$x_1 = \frac{k_2}{k_1 + k_2} x_2 . \,$

Now we just plug this back into (1):

$F_b \,$	$= -k_2 x_2 + k_2 x_1 \,$
	$= -k_2 x_2 + k_2 \left( \frac{k_2}{k_1 + k_2} x_2 \right) \,$
	$= -k_2 x_2 \left( \frac{k_1 + k_2}{k_1 + k_2} \right) + \frac{k_2^2}{k_1 + k_2} x_2 \,$
	$= x_2 \frac{-k_1 k_2 - k_2^2 + k_2^2}{k_1 + k_2} \,$

Finally, the force on the block has been found:

$F_b = - \left( \frac{k_1 k_2 }{k_1 + k_2} \right) x_2 .\,$

So we can define everything in the parenthesis to be

$k_{eq} = \frac{k_1 k_2 }{k_1 + k_2} .\,$

Which can also be written:

$\frac{1}{k_{eq}} = \frac{1}{k_1} + \frac{1}{k_2}. \,$

Equivalent Spring Constant (Parallel)

Both springs are touching the block in this case, and whatever distance spring 1 is compressed has to be the same amount spring 2 is compressed.

The force on the block is then:

$F_b \,$	$= F_1 + F_2 \,$
	$= -k_1 x - k_2 x \,$

So the force on the block is

$F_b = - (k_1 + k_2) x. \,$

Which is why we can define the equivalent spring constant as

$k_{eq} = k_1 + k_2 . \,$

Compressed Distance

In the case where two springs are in series, the magnitude of the force of the springs on each other are equal:

$|F_1| = |F_2| \,$

$k_1 x_1 = k_2 \left(x_2 -x_1 \right). \,$

For spring 1, x₁ is the distance from equilibrium length, and for spring 2, x₂ - x₁ is the distance from its equilibrium length. So we can define

$a_1 = x_1 \,$

$a_2 = x_2 - x_1. \,$

Plug these definitions into the force equation, and we'll get a relationship between the compressed distances for the in series case:

$\frac{a_1}{a_2} = \frac{k_2}{k_1}. \,$

Energy Stored

For the series case, the ratio of energy stored in springs is:

$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{\frac{1}{2} k_1 a_1^2}{\frac{1}{2}k_2 a_2^2}, \,$

but a there is a relationship between a₁ and a₂ derived earlier, so we can plug that in:

$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{k_1}{k_2} \left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right)^2 = \frac{k_2}{k_1} . \,$

For the parallel case,

$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{\frac{1}{2} k_1 x^2}{\frac{1}{2}k_2 x^2} \,$

because the compressed distance of the springs is the same, this simplifies to

$\frac{E_1}{E_2} = \frac{k_1}{k_2}. \,$

[edit] Tensor expression of Hooke's Law

When working with a three-dimensional stress state, a 4^th order tensor $\mathsf{c}$ ( $c_{ijk\ell}$ ) containing 81 elastic coefficients must be defined to link the stress tensor $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ (σ_ij) and the strain tensor $\boldsymbol{\epsilon}$ ( $\epsilon_{k\ell}$ ).

$\boldsymbol{\sigma} = \mathsf{c}:\boldsymbol{\epsilon} ~.$

Expressed in terms of components with respect to an orthonormal basis, the generalized form of Hooke's law is written as (using the summation convention)

$\sigma_{ij} = c_{ijk\ell}~\epsilon_{k\ell}$

The tensor $\mathsf{c}$ is called the stiffness tensor. Due to the symmetry of the stress tensor, strain tensor, and stiffness tensor, only 21 elastic coefficients are independent. As stress is measured in units of pressure and strain is dimensionless, the entries of $c_{ijk\ell}$ are also in units of pressure.

The expression for generalized Hooke's law can be inverted to get a relation for the strain in terms of stress:

$\boldsymbol{\epsilon} = \mathsf{s}:\boldsymbol{\sigma} \qquad {\rm or} \qquad \epsilon_{ij} = s_{ijk\ell}~\sigma_{k\ell} ~.$

The tensor $\mathsf{s}$ is called the compliance tensor.

Generalization for the case of large deformations is provided by models of neo-Hookean solids and Mooney-Rivlin solids.

[edit] Isotropic materials

(see viscosity for an analogous development for viscous fluids.)

Isotropic materials are characterized by properties which are independent of direction in space. Physical equations involving isotropic materials must therefore be independent of the coordinate system chosen to represent them. The strain tensor is a symmetric tensor. Since the trace of any tensor is independent of any coordinate system, the most complete coordinate-free decomposition of a symmetric tensor is to represent it as the sum of a constant tensor and a traceless symmetric tensor. (Symon (1971) Ch. 10) Thus:

$\varepsilon_{ij}=\left(\frac{1}{3}\varepsilon_{kk}\delta_{ij}\right) +\left(\varepsilon_{ij}-\frac{1}{3}\varepsilon_{kk}\delta_{ij}\right)$

where $δ i j$ is the Kronecker delta. The first term on the right is the constant tensor, also known as the pressure, and the second term is the traceless symmetric tensor, also known as the shear tensor.

The most general form of Hooke's law for isotropic materials may now be written as a linear combination of these two tensors:

$\sigma_{ij}=3K\left(\frac{1}{3}\varepsilon_{kk}\delta_{ij}\right) +2G\left(\varepsilon_{ij}-\frac{1}{3}\varepsilon_{kk}\delta_{ij}\right)\,$

where K is the bulk modulus and G is the shear modulus.

Using the relationships between the elastic moduli, these equations may also be expressed in various other ways. For example, the strain may be expressed in terms of the stress tensor as:

$\varepsilon_{11} = \frac{1}{E}\left( \sigma_{11} - \nu(\sigma_{22}+\sigma_{33}) \right)$

$\varepsilon_{22} = \frac{1}{E}\left( \sigma_{22} - \nu(\sigma_{11}+\sigma_{33}) \right)$

$\varepsilon_{33} = \frac{1}{E}\left( \sigma_{33} - \nu(\sigma_{11}+\sigma_{22}) \right)$

$\varepsilon_{12} = \frac{\sigma_{12}}{2G}$

$\varepsilon_{13} = \frac{\sigma_{13}}{2G}$

$\varepsilon_{23} = \frac{\sigma_{23}}{2G}$

where E is the modulus of elasticity and $ν$ is Poisson's ratio. (See 3-D elasticity).

Derivation of Hooke's law in 3D

The 3-D form of Hooke's law can be derived using Poisson's ratio and the 1-D form of Hooke's law as follows.

Consider the strain and stress relation as a superposition of two effects: stretching in direction of the load (1) and shrinking (caused by the load) in perpendicular directions (2 and 3),

$\varepsilon_1' = \frac{1}{E}\sigma_1$ ,

$\varepsilon_2' = -\nu\varepsilon_1$ ,

$\varepsilon_3' = -\nu\varepsilon_1$ ,

where $ν$ is the Poisson's ratio and $E$ the Young Modulus. We get similar equations to the loads in directions 2 and 3,

$\varepsilon_1'' = -\nu\varepsilon_2$ ,

$\varepsilon_2'' = \frac{1}{E}\sigma_2$ ,

$\varepsilon_3'' = -\nu\varepsilon_2$ ,

and

$\varepsilon_1''' = -\nu\varepsilon_3$ ,

$\varepsilon_2''' = -\nu\varepsilon_3$ ,

$\varepsilon_3''' = \frac{1}{E}\sigma_3$ .

Summing the three cases together ( $\varepsilon_i = \varepsilon_i' + \varepsilon_i'' +\varepsilon_i'''$ ) we get

$\varepsilon_1 = \frac{1}{E}(\sigma_1-\nu(\sigma_2+\sigma_3))$

$\varepsilon_2 = \frac{1}{E}(\sigma_2-\nu(\sigma_1+\sigma_3))$

$\varepsilon_3 = \frac{1}{E}(\sigma_3-\nu(\sigma_1+\sigma_2))$

or by adding and subtracting one $νσ$

$\varepsilon_1 = \frac{1}{E}((1+\nu)\sigma_1-\nu(\sigma_1+\sigma_2+\sigma_3))$

$\varepsilon_2 = \frac{1}{E}((1+\nu)\sigma_2-\nu(\sigma_1+\sigma_2+\sigma_3))$

$\varepsilon_3 = \frac{1}{E}((1+\nu)\sigma_3-\nu(\sigma_1+\sigma_2+\sigma_3))$

and further we get by solving $σ 1$

$\sigma_1 = \frac{E}{1+\nu}\varepsilon_1 + \frac{\nu}{1+\nu}(\sigma_1+\sigma_2+\sigma_3)$ .

Calculating the sum

$\sum_{i=1,2,3}\varepsilon_i = \frac{1}{E}((1+\nu)\sum_{i=1,2,3}\sigma_i - 3\nu(\sum_{i=1,2,3}\sigma_i)) = \frac{1-2\nu}{E}\sum_{i=1,2,3}\sigma_i$

$\sigma_1 +\sigma_2+\sigma_3 = \frac{E}{1-2\nu}(\varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2 +\varepsilon_3)$

and substituting it to the equation solved for $σ 1$ gives

$\sigma_1 = \frac{E}{1+\nu}\varepsilon_1 + \frac{E\nu}{(1+\nu)(1-2\nu)}(\varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2 +\varepsilon_3)$ ,

$\sigma_1 = 2\mu\varepsilon_1 + \lambda(\varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2 +\varepsilon_3)$ ,

where $μ$ and $λ$ are the Lamé parameters. Similar treatment of directions 2 and 3 gives the Hooke's law in three dimensions.

[edit] Anisotropic materials

The symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor ( $\sigma_{ij} = \sigma_{ji}\,$ ) and the generalized Hooke's laws ( $\sigma_{ij} = c_{ijk\ell}~ \epsilon_{k\ell}$ ) implies that $c_{ijk\ell} = c_{jik\ell}\,$ . Similarly, the symmetry of the infinitesimal strain tensor implies that $c_{ijk\ell} = c_{ij\ell k}\,$ . These symmetries are called the minor symmetries of the stiffness tensor ( $\mathsf{c}$ ).

If in addition, the stress-strain relation can be derived from a strain energy density functional ( $U$ ), then

$\sigma_{ij} = c_{ijk\ell}~\epsilon_{k\ell} = \cfrac{\partial U}{\partial \epsilon_{ij}} \quad \implies \quad \cfrac{\partial^2 U}{\partial\epsilon_{ij}~\partial\epsilon_{k\ell}} = c_{ijk\ell} ~.$

The arbitrariness of the order of differentiation implies that $c_{ijk\ell} = c_{k\ell ij}\,$ . These are called the major symmetries of the stiffness tensor. The major and minor symmetries indicate that the stiffness tensor has only 21 independent components.

[edit] Matrix representation (stiffness tensor)

It is often useful to express the anisotropic form of Hooke's law in matrix notation, also called Voigt notation. To do this we take advantage of the symmetry of the stress and strain tensors and express them as six-dimensional vectors in an orthonormal coordinate system ( $\mathbf{e}_1,\mathbf{e}_2,\mathbf{e}_3$ ) as

$[\boldsymbol{\sigma}] = \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{11}\\ \sigma_{22} \\ \sigma_{33} \\ \sigma_{23} \\ \sigma_{31} \\ \sigma_{12} \end{bmatrix} \equiv \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1 \\ \sigma_2 \\ \sigma_3 \\ \sigma_4 \\ \sigma_5 \\ \sigma_6 \end{bmatrix} ~;~~ [\boldsymbol{\epsilon}] = \begin{bmatrix}\epsilon_{11}\\ \epsilon_{22} \\ \epsilon_{33} \\ 2\epsilon_{23} \\ 2\epsilon_{31} \\ 2\epsilon_{12} \end{bmatrix} \equiv \begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_1 \\ \epsilon_2 \\ \epsilon_3 \\ \epsilon_4 \\ \epsilon_5 \\ \epsilon_6 \end{bmatrix}$

Then the stiffness tensor ( $\mathsf{c}$ ) can be expressed as

$[\mathsf{C}] = \begin{bmatrix} c_{1111} & c_{1122} & c_{1133} & c_{1123} & c_{1131} & c_{1112} \\ c_{2211} & c_{2222} & c_{2233} & c_{2223} & c_{2231} & c_{2212} \\ c_{3311} & c_{3322} & c_{3333} & c_{3323} & c_{3331} & c_{3312} \\ c_{2311} & c_{2322} & c_{2333} & c_{2323} & c_{2331} & c_{2312} \\ c_{3111} & c_{3122} & c_{3133} & c_{3123} & c_{3131} & c_{3112} \\ c_{1211} & c_{1222} & c_{1233} & c_{1223} & c_{1231} & c_{1212} \end{bmatrix} \equiv \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} & C_{14} & C_{15} & C_{16} \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} & C_{24} & C_{25} & C_{26} \\ C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} & C_{34} & C_{35} & C_{36} \\ C_{14} & C_{24} & C_{34} & C_{44} & C_{45} & C_{46} \\ C_{15} & C_{25} & C_{35} & C_{45} & C_{55} & C_{56} \\ C_{16} & C_{26} & C_{36} & C_{46} & C_{56} & C_{66} \end{bmatrix}$

and Hooke's law is written as

$[\boldsymbol{\sigma}] = [\mathsf{C}][\boldsymbol{\epsilon}] \qquad \text{or} \qquad \sigma_i = C_{ij} \epsilon_j ~.$

Similarly the compliance tensor ( $\mathsf{s}$ ) can be written as

$[\mathsf{S}] = \begin{bmatrix} s_{1111} & s_{1122} & s_{1133} & 2s_{1123} & 2s_{1131} & 2s_{1112} \\ s_{2211} & s_{2222} & s_{2233} & 2s_{2223} & 2s_{2231} & 2s_{2212} \\ s_{3311} & s_{3322} & s_{3333} & 2s_{3323} & 2s_{3331} & 2s_{3312} \\ 2s_{2311} & 2s_{2322} & 2s_{2333} & 4s_{2323} & 4s_{2331} & 4s_{2312} \\ 2s_{3111} & 2s_{3122} & 2s_{3133} & 4s_{3123} & 4s_{3131} & 4s_{3112} \\ 2s_{1211} & 2s_{1222} & 2s_{1233} & 4s_{1223} & 4s_{1231} & 4s_{1212} \end{bmatrix} \equiv \begin{bmatrix} S_{11} & S_{12} & S_{13} & S_{14} & S_{15} & S_{16} \\ S_{12} & S_{22} & S_{23} & S_{24} & S_{25} & S_{26} \\ S_{13} & S_{23} & S_{33} & S_{34} & S_{35} & S_{36} \\ S_{14} & S_{24} & S_{34} & S_{44} & S_{45} & S_{46} \\ S_{15} & S_{25} & S_{35} & S_{45} & S_{55} & S_{56} \\ S_{16} & S_{26} & S_{36} & S_{46} & S_{56} & S_{66} \end{bmatrix}$

[edit] Change of coordinate system

If a linear elastic material is rotated from a reference configuration to another, then the material is symmetric with respect to the rotation if the components of the stiffness tensor in the rotated configuration are related to the components in the reference configuration by the relation ^[2]

$c_{pqrs} = l_{pi}~l_{qj}~l_{rk}~l_{s\ell}~c_{ijk\ell}$

where $l a b$ are the components of an orthogonal rotation matrix $[L]$ . The same relation also holds for inversions.

In matrix notation, if the transformed basis (rotated or inverted) is related to the reference basis by

$[\mathbf{e}_i'] = [L][\mathbf{e}_i]$

then

$C_{ij}~\epsilon_i~\epsilon_j = C_{ij}'~\epsilon'_i~\epsilon'_j ~.$

In addition, if the material is symmetric with respect to the transformation $[L]$ then

$C_{ij} = C'_{ij} \quad \implies \quad C_{ij}~(\epsilon_i~\epsilon_j - \epsilon'_i~\epsilon'_j) = 0 ~.$

[edit] Orthotropic materials

Orthotropic materials have three orthogonal planes of symmetry. If the basis vectors ( $\mathbf{e}_1,\mathbf{e}_2,\mathbf{e}_3$ ) are normals to the planes of symmetry then the coordinate transformation relations imply that

$\begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1 \\ \sigma_2 \\ \sigma_3 \\ \sigma_4 \\ \sigma_5 \\ \sigma_6 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{55} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{66} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_1 \\ \epsilon_2 \\ \epsilon_3 \\ \epsilon_4 \\ \epsilon_5 \\ \epsilon_6 \end{bmatrix}$

The inverse of this relation is commonly written as^[3]

$\begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_{{\rm xx}} \\ \epsilon_{\rm yy} \\ \epsilon_{\rm zz} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm yz} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm zx} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm xy} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm x}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm xy}}{E_{\rm x}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm xz}}{E_{\rm x}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -\tfrac{\nu_{\rm yx}}{E_{\rm y}} & \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm y}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm yz}}{E_{\rm y}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -\tfrac{\nu_{\rm zx}}{E_{\rm z}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm zy}}{E_{\rm z}} & \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm z}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{G_{\rm yz}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{G_{\rm zx}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{G_{\rm xy}} \\ \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_{\rm xx} \\ \sigma_{\rm yy} \\ \sigma_{\rm zz} \\ \sigma_{\rm yz} \\ \sigma_{\rm zx} \\ \sigma_{\rm xy} \end{bmatrix}$

where

${E}_{\rm i}\,$ is the Young's modulus along axis

i

$G_{\rm ij}\,$ is the shear modulus in direction

j

on the plane whose normal is in direction

i

$\nu_{\rm ij}\,$ is the Poisson's ratio that corresponds to a contraction in direction

j

when an extension is applied in direction

i

.

[edit] Transversely isotropic materials

A transversely isotropic material is symmetric with respect to a rotation about an axis of symmetry. For such a material, if $\mathbf{e}_3$ is the axis of symmetry, Hooke's law can be expressed as

$\begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1 \\ \sigma_2 \\ \sigma_3 \\ \sigma_4 \\ \sigma_5 \\ \sigma_6 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{13} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{13} & C_{13} & C_{33} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{2}(C_{11}-C_{12}) \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_1 \\ \epsilon_2 \\ \epsilon_3 \\ \epsilon_4 \\ \epsilon_5 \\ \epsilon_6 \end{bmatrix}$

More frequently, the $x \equiv \mathbf{e}_1$ axis is taken to be the axis of symmetry and the inverse Hooke's law is written as ^[4]

$\begin{bmatrix} \epsilon_{{\rm xx}} \\ \epsilon_{\rm yy} \\ \epsilon_{\rm zz} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm yz} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm zx} \\ 2\epsilon_{\rm xy} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm x}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm xy}}{E_{\rm x}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm xy}}{E_{\rm x}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -\tfrac{\nu_{\rm yx}}{E_{\rm y}} & \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm y}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm yz}}{E_{\rm y}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -\tfrac{\nu_{\rm yx}}{E_{\rm y}} & - \tfrac{\nu_{\rm zy}}{E_{\rm y}} & \tfrac{1}{E_{\rm y}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{2(1+\nu_{\rm yz})}{E_{\rm y}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{G_{\rm xy}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1}{G_{\rm xy}} \\ \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_{\rm xx} \\ \sigma_{\rm yy} \\ \sigma_{\rm zz} \\ \sigma_{\rm yz} \\ \sigma_{\rm zx} \\ \sigma_{\rm xy} \end{bmatrix}$

[edit] Thermodynamic basis of Hooke's law

Linear deformations of elastic materials can be approximated as adiabatic. Under these conditions and for quasistatic processes the first law of thermodynamics for a deformed body can be expressed as

$\delta W = \delta U\,$

where $δ U$ is the increase in internal energy and $δ W$ is the work done by external forces. The work can be split into two terms

$\delta W = \delta W_s + \delta W_b\,$

where $δ W s$ is the work done by surface forces while $δ W b$ is the work done by body forces. If $\delta\mathbf{u}$ is a variation of the displacement field $\mathbf{u}$ in the body, then the two external work terms can be expressed as

$\delta W_s = \int_{\partial\Omega} \mathbf{t}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}~{\rm dS} ~;~~ \delta W_b = \int_{\Omega} \mathbf{b}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}~{\rm dV}$

where $\mathbf{t}$ is the surface traction vector, $\mathbf{b}$ is the body force vector, $\Omega\,$ represents the body and $\partial\Omega$ represents its surface. Using the relation between the Cauchy stress and the surface traction, $\mathbf{t} = \mathbf{n}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ (where $\mathbf{n}$ is the unit outward normal to $\partial\Omega$ ), we have

$\delta W = \delta U = \int_{\partial\Omega} (\mathbf{n}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma})\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}~{\rm dS} + \int_{\Omega} \mathbf{b}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}~{\rm dV}$

Converting the surface integral into a volume integral via the divergence theorem gives

$\delta U = \int_{\Omega} [\boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}) + \mathbf{b}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}]~ {\rm dV} ~.$

Using the symmetry of the Cauchy stress and the identity

$\boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot(\boldsymbol{A}\cdot\mathbf{b}) = (\boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot\boldsymbol{A})\cdot\mathbf{b}+ \tfrac{1}{2}[\boldsymbol{A}^T:\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{b}+ \boldsymbol{A}:(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\mathbf{b})^T]$

we have

$\delta U = \int_{\Omega} [\boldsymbol{\sigma}: \tfrac{1}{2}\{\boldsymbol{\nabla}\delta\mathbf{u}+(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\delta\mathbf{u})^T\} + \{\boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}+\mathbf{b}\}\cdot\delta\mathbf{u}]~{\rm dV} ~.$

From the definition of strain and from the equations of equilibrium we have

$\delta\boldsymbol{\epsilon} = \tfrac{1}{2}[\boldsymbol{\nabla}\delta\mathbf{u}+(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\delta\mathbf{u})^T] ~;~~ \boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}+\mathbf{b}=\mathbf{0} ~.$

Hence we can write

$\delta U = \int_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{\sigma}:\delta\boldsymbol{\epsilon}~{\rm dV}$

and therefore the variation in the internal energy density is given by

$\delta U_0 = \boldsymbol{\sigma}:\delta\boldsymbol{\epsilon} ~.$

An elastic material is defined as one in which the total internal energy is equal to the potential energy of the internal forces (also called the elastic strain energy). Therefore the internal energy density is a function of the strains, $U_0 = U_0(\boldsymbol{\epsilon})$ and the variation of the internal energy can be expressed as

$\delta U_0 = \cfrac{\partial U_0}{\partial\boldsymbol{\epsilon}}:\delta\boldsymbol{\epsilon} ~.$

Since the variation of strain is arbitrary, the stress-strain relation of an elastic material is given by

$\boldsymbol{\sigma} = \cfrac{\partial U_0}{\partial\boldsymbol{\epsilon}}~.$

For a linear elastic material, the quantity $\partial U_0/\partial\boldsymbol{\epsilon}$ is a linear function of $\boldsymbol{\epsilon}$ , and can therefore be expressed as

$\boldsymbol{\sigma} = \mathsf{c}:\boldsymbol{\epsilon}$

where $\mathsf{c}$ is a fourth-order tensor of material constants, also called the stiffness tensor.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

^ The anagram was "ceiiinossssttuu", [1]; cf. the anagram for the Catenary, which appeared in the preceding paragraph.
^ Slaughter, W. S., 2002, The Linearized Theory of Elasticity, Birkhauser
^ Boresi, A. P, Schmidt, R. J. and Sidebottom, O. M., 1993, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Wiley.
^ Tan, S. C., 1994, Stress Concentrations in Laminated Composites, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA.

A.C. Ugural, S.K. Fenster, Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity, 4th ed
Symon, Keith (1971). Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. ISBN 0-201-07392-7.

[edit] External links

[0] The anagram was "ceiiinossssttuu", [1]; cf. the anagram for the Catenary, which appeared in the preceding paragraph.

[Slaughter-1] Slaughter, W. S., 2002, The Linearized Theory of Elasticity, Birkhauser

[Boresi-2] Boresi, A. P, Schmidt, R. J. and Sidebottom, O. M., 1993, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Wiley.

[Tan-3] Tan, S. C., 1994, Stress Concentrations in Laminated Composites, Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

Contents