| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
American Chiropractic Rehabilitation Board - X. Scoring and Score acrb.org | The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score -... orthopaedicscore.com | SCORE > About SCORE surgicalcore.org |
The Gleason staging system is used to help evaluate the prognosis of men with prostate cancer. Together with other parameters, it is incorporated into a strategy of prostate cancer staging which predicts prognosis and helps guide therapy. A Gleason score is given to prostate cancer based upon its microscopic appearance.[1] Cancers with a higher Gleason score are more aggressive and have a worse prognosis.
[edit] ProcessMost often, a urologist or radiologist will remove a cylindrical sample (biopsy) of prostate tissue through the rectum, using hollow needles, and prepare microscope slides. After a prostate is removed in surgery, a pathologist will slice the prostate for a final examination. [edit] Grades and scoresThe pathologist assigns a grade to the most common tumor pattern, and a second grade to the next most common tumor pattern. The two grades are added together to get a Gleason score. For example, if the most common tumor pattern was grade 3, and the next most common tumor pattern was grade 4, the Gleason score would be 3+4 = 7. The Gleason grade is also known as the Gleason pattern, and the Gleason score is also known as the Gleason sum. The Gleason grade ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 having the worst prognosis. The Gleason score ranges from 2 to 10, with 10 having the worst prognosis. It should be noted that for Gleason score 7, a Gleason 4+3 is a more aggressive cancer than a Gleason 3+4. Also, there is not really any difference between the aggressiveness of a Gleason score 9 or 10 tumor. [edit] Patterns 1 through 5Gleason patterns are associated with the following features:
In the United Kingdom, prostate cancer of Gleason pattern 1 and 2 are almost never seen. Gleason pattern 3 is by far the most common. [edit] Primary, secondary, and tertiaryA pathologist examines the biopsy specimen and attempts to give a score to the two patterns.
These scores are then added to obtain the final Gleason score. Increasingly, pathologists provide details of the "tertiary" component. This is where there is a small component of a third (generally more aggressive) pattern. So there could be a Gleason 3+4 with a tertiary component of pattern 5 - this would be considered to be more aggressive than a prostate cancer that was Gleason 3+4 with no tertiary pattern 5. Although it is debatable as to what the full extent the tertiary component has on the aggressiveness of a cancer. [edit] HistoryThe scoring system is named after Dr. Donald Gleason, a pathologist at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital who developed it with other colleagues at that facility in the 1960s. [2][3] It remains an important tool. [edit] References
[edit] External links
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |