| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Leslie P. Laing Gibbard academyofprosthodontics.o... | da Vinci Surgery - Roger Satterthwaite, M.D. - Urology davincisurgery.com |
The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a result about voting systems designed to choose a single winner from the preferences of certain individuals, where each individual ranks all candidates in order of preference. It states that, for three or more candidates, one of the following three things must hold for every voting rule:
Since rules which forbid certain candidates from winning or which are dictatorial are not suitable for real-life voting systems, all voting systems which yield a single winner either are manipulable or do not meet the preconditions of the theorem. Taylor shows that the result holds even if ties are allowed in the ballots: the winner is then chosen from the candidates tied at the top of the dictator's ballot. Arrow's impossibility theorem is a similar theorem that deals with voting systems designed to yield a complete preference order of the candidates, rather than only choosing a winner. Similarly, the Duggan–Schwartz theorem deals with voting systems that choose a (nonempty) set of winners rather than a single winner. Meanwhile, Holmström's theorem shows similar impossibility results for firms. [edit] References
[edit] External links
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |