This article needs references that appear in reliable third-party publications. Primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please add more appropriate citations from reliable sources. (January 2009)

Freiwirtschaft (German for free economy) is a libertarian economic idea founded by Silvio Gesell in 1916. He called it Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung (natural economic order). His idea has not been put into practice by any state since then. However, in 1932, a group of Swiss businessmen used his ideas to found WIR, an organization which created an economic miracle and serves as an essential component of Switzerland's legendary economic stability.

Freiwirtschaft consists of three central aspects, usually summed up as The Three Fs:

• Freigeld (free money)
  • All money is issued for a limited period by constant value (neither inflation, nor deflation).
  • Long-term saving requires investment in bonds or stocks.
• Freiland (free land)
  • All land is owned by public institutions and can only be rented, not purchased (see also Henry George).
• Freihandel (Free Trade)
  • Free Trade has long been a mainstream position now, but the anti-globalization movement largely opposes it.

The (proposed) results include:

• More private spending for consumption and investment
• Consumers invest surplus money in expanding companies
• Full employment: Work for everyone who can work
• Rate of economic growth can be set by the society
• Interest rates drop to almost zero percent in the long run
  • Freiland prevents high real estate prices
• Tremendous social disparities will cease
• Less working hours per week for everyone in the long run

There seems to be an attempt to realize Freiwirtschaft in a small area in Canada, based on artificial money called Gogo that loses its value after one year^{[citation needed]}.

Contents 1 Flaws of the money system 2 Criticism 3 References 4 External links

[edit] Flaws of the money system

Freiwirtschaft claims that current monetary systems are flawed. According to Adam Smith, prices convey information. For example, dropping prices mean that there is less demand or more supply. This leads to a buyer buying more, or a seller starting to produce something else. As a reaction, the price rises again. So, the price, together with the market participants, builds up a feedback loop around a stable, "ideal" price. At this stable price, the market is ideal, no one pays too much or earns too little, and there are no tendencies from either party to change that price. The "wobbling" around that ideal price is called self-stabilizing.

This is not the case on the finance market. Without the continuous increase of the amount of money in circulation by the central bank, the demand would continuously drop, since the circulation speed decreases.^[1] Dropping demand forces companies to lower their prices to make any money at all. When prices start dropping, potential customers put off their purchase as long as possible to get the lowest price, resulting in the demand decreasing even more. The feedback loop spirals down to a point where the company does not make any money at all. That, eventually, results in layoffs and even the bankruptcy of the company. Workers in other companies tend to be even more cautious in spending money, ultimately resulting in the breakdown of the economy.

The key error of the system is the ill-transported information in the price. Money is nothing but claim for goods and services from the economy that accepts the money. In a weak economy, money is worth less in goods. But instead of an inflation, the result is a deflation as described above, and less money can now buy the same goods. The market players do not realize that they are destroying the very economy that should ensure the value of the money. This feedback loop is self-destabilizing. According to Freiwirtschaft theory, this is the reason for the cycle of crisis in world economy.

[edit] Criticism

This article is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (December 2006)

Critics following Karl Marx argue that measures of Freiwirtschaft just hit capitalist financial companies whereas capitalist manufacturing companies benefit from cheap credits and increase their profit. Freiwirtschaft economists would counter that the increased profits would immediately increase investments, and thus the macroeconomical demand. This would accelerate to the point of zero joblessness, at which point salary begins to rise until they consume all profits. Therefore what the Marxist would call surplus value is almost completely returned to the actual workers.

The most common arguments against Freiwirtschaft are:

• the periodical exchange of money causes administration costs
• Central bank must set the optimal money exchange charge which is as difficult to find as the optimal interest rate
• Some propose that deflation has never been observed to coincide with the disastrous effects described above in the absence of other interventionist policies.  This is contradicted by the deflation attendant to the periodic economic crises of the 19th century, such as the long depression.

  As opposed to generalized deflation, sector-specific deflation, such as in consumer electronics, is not associated with economic hardship, and instead firms have thrived while consumers enjoyed low prices.

[edit] References

1. ^ Norbert Rost: Eine experimentelle Überprüfung der Aussagen der Freiwirtschaftslehre (An experimental check of the statements of the Freiwirtschaft) (diploma thesis, Dresden, 2003) p. 25 seqq.

[edit] External links

• http://www.finanzcrash.com/english/aberrations.html - Introduction to Freiwirtschaft
• http://geldreform.de (in German, partly English)
• http://www.inwo.de (in German, partly English)