Fossil embryos Information & Fossil embryos Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Donor embryo | ivf embryo transfer | embryo cloning
Donor embryo | ivf embryo transfer | embryo cloning
treatmenttrips.com
 IHR.com - Embryo Adoption Programs, Embryo Donation, Embryo Storage
IHR.com - Embryo Adoption Programs, Embryo Donation, Embryo Storage
ihr.com
 Reproductive Services - frozen embryos , embryo...
Reproductive Services - frozen embryos, embryo...
fertilitycenter-uconn.org
 Reproductive Services - frozen embryos , embryo...
Reproductive Services - frozen embryos, embryo...
uconnfertility.com
 

Many fossils of the 580 million year old Doushantuo formation have been interpreted as fossil embryos; embryos are also common throughout the Cambrian fossil record.

[edit] Preservation

Taphonomic studies indicate that embryos are preserved for longest in reducing, anoxic conditions - these conditions can keep the embryos intact for long enough for bacteria to mineralise the cells and permit their preservation.[1] However, phosphatisation was very rapid in the Doushantuo, so it's possible that faster preservation allowed embryos in different regimes to be preserved.

Preservation is mediated by bacterial biofilms. The cells of the embryo break down within hours of their death, under the effect of its own enzymes; bacteria invade the dacaying embryo before its cells can collapse, and biofilms taking on and preserving the three dimensional structure of the cells. The activity of these bacteria promotes mineralisation.[2]

Currently, only fossils representing very early stages in embryonic development have been preserved - no embryos have been interpreted as having undergone a large number cleavage stages.[3]

[edit] Affinities

Some embryos have been interpreted as colonies of sulfur-reducing bacteria, a claim that cannot be upheld in all cases.[3]

Most fossil embryos are considered to belong to cnidarians and ecdysozoans, if they even fall into the metazoan crown group. No deuterostome or lophotrochozoan embryos have yet been reported, despite their similar preservation potential; this may be a result of different egg laying behaviour, as ecdysozoans lay eggs in the sediment rather than releasing them into the open - enhancing the chance of them becoming mineralised.[1]

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b Gostling, Neil J.; Thomas, Ceri-Wyn; Greenwood, Jenny M.; Dong, Xiping; Bengtson, Stefan; Raff, Elizabeth C.; Raff, Rudolf A.; Degnan, Bernard M.; Stampanoni, Marco; Donoghue, Philip C. J. (June 2008). "Deciphering the fossil record of early bilaterian embryonic development in light of experimental taphonomy". Evolution & Development 3 (11): 339–349. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00242.x. 
  2. ^ Raff, E.C.; Schollaert, K.L.; Nelson, D.E.; Donoghue, P.C.J.; Thomas, C.-W.; Turner, F.R.; Stein, B.D.; Dong, X.; Bengtson, S.; Huldtgren, T.; Stampanoni, M.; Chongyu, Y.; Raff, R.A. (Dec 2008). "Embryo fossilization is a biological process mediated by microbial biofilms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (49): 19360–19365. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810106105. PMID 19047625. 
  3. ^ a b Gostling, N.J.; Donoghue, P.C.J.; Bengtson, S (2007). "The Earliest Fossil Embryos Begin to Mature". Evolution & Development 9 (3): 206–7. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00152.x. 



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots