Flaming (Internet) Information & Flaming (Internet) Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Bayer 480 Flame Electrolyte Analyzer, Bayer / Ciba Corning 480 Flame,...
Bayer 480 Flame Electrolyte Analyzer, Bayer / Ciba Corning 480 Flame,...
blockscientific.com
 Internet Only Specials | Internet Specials
Internet Only Specials | Internet Specials
tuscanymedspa.com
 Law Firm Internet Marketing | Law Firm Web Design | Attorney Internet...
Law Firm Internet Marketing | Law Firm Web Design | Attorney Internet...
buttocksenlargement.com
 Galaxy Internet Services: VOIP Internet Phone, Dry Loop High Speed...
Galaxy Internet Services: VOIP Internet Phone, Dry Loop High Speed...
bostonsqualitydentists.co...
 

Flaming is hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. Flaming usually occurs in the social context of a discussion board, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), by e-mail or on Video-sharing websites. It is usually the result of the discussion of heated real-world issues like politics, religion, and philosophy, or of issues that polarise subpopulations (for example, the perennial debating between Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 owners). Internet trolls frequently set out to incite flamewars for the sole purpose of offending or irritating other posters.

Jay Forrester, in discussing participants' internal modelling of a discussion, says:

Mental models are fuzzy, incomplete, and imprecisely stated. Furthermore, within a single individual, mental models change with time, even during the flow of a single conversation. The human mind assembles a few relationships to fit the context of a discussion. As debate shifts, so do the mental models. Even when only a single topic is being discussed, each participant in a conversation employs a different mental model to interpret the subject. Fundamental assumptions differ but are never brought into the open. Goals are different but left unstated. It is little wonder that compromise takes so long. And even when consensus is reached, the underlying assumptions may be fallacies that lead to laws and programs that fail. The human mind is not adapted to understanding correctly the consequences implied by a mental model. A mental model may be correct in structure and assumptions but, even so, the human mind--either individually or as a group consensus--is apt to draw the wrong implications for the future.[1]

Flaming on the Internet started in the Usenet hierarchies (although it was known to occur in the WWIVnet and FidoNet computer networks as well).[citation needed]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Jay W. Forrester (1971). "Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems". MIT System Dynamics in Education Project. p. 4. http://sysdyn.clexchange.org/sdep/Roadmaps/RM1/D-4468-2.pdf. Retrieved 2009-09-03. 

[edit] Further reading

  • Kirschner, Paul A.; et al.. Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-making. London: Springer. ISBN 1852336641. 

[edit] External links




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots