| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Temple Dental Office, Temple Cosmetic Dentist, Temple General Dentist, coxbonddental.com | Tourist attractions in Coimbatore, Temple tourism marudhamalai, Temple... saravanadental.com | Temple at Middle Path - FAQs about constructing the Temple middlepath.com.au | Cosmetic Dentist Temple City Richard Haber DDS, Temple City Dentist... beverly-hills-cosmetic-de... |
Solomon's Temple (Hebrew: בית המקדש, transliterated Beit HaMikdash, "The House of That Which is Holy"), also known as the First Temple, was, according to the Hebrew Bible, the first temple of the ancient religion of the biblical Israelites, originally constructed by King Solomon on the hill called Moriah in Jerusalem. It was designed to house the Ark of the Covenant, and to serve the Israelites (and Proselytes) as a central place where they could worship the God of Israel. According to the Bible, it functioned as a religious focal point for worship and the sacrifices known as the korbanot in ancient Judaism. Completed in 960 BCE, it was destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. The Second Temple was subsequently built on the same site, and was destroyed in 70 CE. Jewish eschatology commonly includes the belief that a Third Temple will be built.
[edit] Biblical account[edit] SummaryThe only source for information on a Temple in Jerusalem in the Iron Age II (c. 1000-586/587 BCE) is the account contained in the books of Joshua, Judges, 1-2 Samuel and 1-2 Kings, which are all included in the Bible (see so-called Deuteronomistic History). The Temple also figures in some of the books of prophecies attributed to the pre-exilic prophets, for example, Isaiah 6, Micah 4:1, and Jeremiah 7, which are also included in the Bible. 1 Kings 6:1-38 tells how King Solomon built the Temple: details of the building are given in this chapter and chapter 7 (see Description section below), and its dedication by Solomon is described in chapter 8. 2 Kings 12:4-16 describes arrangements for the refurbishment of the Temple in the time of king Jehoash of Judah in the 9th century BCE. According to 2 Kings 14:14 the Temple was looted by Jehoash of Israel (a different Jehoash) in the early 8th century and again by King Ahaz in the late 8th century (2 Kings 16:8). Ahaz also installed some cultic innovations in the Temple which were abhorrent to the author of 1-2 Kings (2 Kings 16:10-18). The Temple also figures in the account of King Hezekiah, who turned Judah away from idols,[1] when later in the same century, when Hezekiah is confronted by a siege by the Assyrian king Sennacherib (2 Kings 18:23, 19:1 and the Taylor prism), Hezekiah "instead of plundering the temple treasuries...now uses the temple the way it is designed to be used-as a house of prayer (2 Kings 19:1-14),[2]. Hezekiah's son, however, is much different than his father and during the reign of Manasseh of Judah in the early and middle seventh century (2 Kings 21:4-9). Manasseh makes innovations to the Temple cult. He has been described as an idolatrous Solomon who also fell into idolatry, and Manasseh is described as a king who "makes" (2 Kings 21:3-7), "builds" (2 Kings 21:3) high places (cf. 1 Kings 11:7)(see Deuteronomy 12 for the prohibition against high place worship), yet while Solomon's idolatry was punished by a divided kingdom, Manessah's idolatry will be punished by exile.[3] King Josiah, the grandson of Manasseh, refurbished and made changes to the Temple by removing idolatrous vessels and destroying the idolatrous priesthood c. 621 BCE (2 Kings 22:3-9; 23:11-12). The Temple was plundered by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar, during the brief reign of Jehoiachin c. 598 (2 Kings 24:13), Josiah's grandson. The Babylonians attacked Jerusalem again and burned the Temple in 586/587 BCE, along with most of the city. The city wall was broken down, and the surviving population of the city were carried away. (2 Kings 25).[4] [edit] Description A sketch of Solomon's Temple based on descriptions in the Tanakh. The detailed descriptions provided in the Tanakh and educated guesses based on the remains of other temples in the region are the sources for reconstructions of its appearance. Technical details are lacking, since the scribes who wrote the books were not architects or engineers.[5] Reconstructions differ; the following is largely based on Easton's Bible Dictionary and the Jewish Encyclopedia:
The reason for the color scheme of the veil was symbolic. In Jewish tradition, blue represented the heavens, while red or crimson represented the earth. Purple, a combination of the two colors, represents a meeting of the heavens and the earth. Thus, purple can also be a representation of the Holy Messiah in Jewish and Christian traditions.
According to biblical tradition, round about the building were:
The inner court of the Priests contained the Altar of burnt-offering (2 Chr. 15:8), the brazen Sea (4:2-5, 10) and ten lavers (1 Kings 7:38, 39). 2 Kings 16:14 says that a brazen altar stood before the Temple, 2 Chr. 4:1 gives its dimensions as 20 cubits square and 10 cubits high. The brazen Sea (Laver), 10 cubits wide brim to brim, 5 cubits deep and with a circumference of 30 cubits around the brim, rested on the backs of twelve oxen (1 Kings 7:23-26). The Book of Kings gives its capacity as "2,000 baths" (24,000 US gallons), but Chronicles inflates this to three thousand baths (36,000 US gallons) (2 Chr. 4:5-6) and states that its purpose was to afford opportunity for the purification by immersion of the body of the priests. (According to Talmud tractate Mikvaot, a "bath" of 40 seahs is the minimum permissible size for a Mikvah). The lavers, each of which held "forty baths" (1 Kings 7:38), rested on portable holders made of bronze, provided with wheels, and ornamented with figures of lions, cherubim, and palm-trees. The author of the books of the Kings describes their minute details with great interest (1 Kings 7:27-37). Josephus reported that the vessels in the Temple were composed of Orichalcum in Antiquities of the Jews. According to 1 Kings 7:48 there stood before the Holy of Holies a golden altar of incense and a table for showbread. This table was of gold, as were also the five candlesticks on each side of it. The implements for the care of the candles—tongs, basins, snuffers, and fire-pans—were of gold; and so were the hinges of the doors. [edit] LocationThe Temple is believed to have been situated upon the hill which forms the site of the present-day Temple Mount, in the center of which area is the Dome of the Rock. Under the Jebusites the site was used as a threshing floor. 2 Samuel 24 describes its consecration during David's reign. Two other, slightly different sites for the Temple have also been proposed, on this same hill. One places the stone altar at the location of the rock which is now beneath the gilded dome, with the rest of the temple to the west. The Well of Souls was, in this theory, a pit for the remnants of the blood services of the korbanot. The other theory places the Holy of Holies atop this rock. Still another location has recently been proposed between the Dome of the Rock and the gilded dome, based on orientation to the eastern wall, drainage channels, orientation of the platform stones, and the location of a possible Boaz pillar base[6]. [edit] Raids and destructionAccording to the Bible, the temple was pillaged or had its valuables confiscated many times during the course of its history (dates before Ahaz are suppositional):
These sacred vessels were, at the end of the Babylonian Captivity, restored to the Jews by Cyrus, in 538/9 BCE (Ezra 1:1-11). [edit] Composition of the textIt is widely but not universally accepted that the Deuteronomistic History (Dtr) was written during the reign of Josiah (reigned c.641-609 BCE) with final revisions and additions a few decades after the destruction of Jerusalem (586 BCE). A minority viewpoint, but an important one, thinks that it was written considerably later, in the late Persian Period (c 500-300 BCE) or even in the Hellenistic Period in the third or second centuries BCE. The majority of scholars accept the earlier dates, largely because the Hebrew of the Dtr looks much more like that of pre-exilic inscriptions than Hellenistic Hebrew, and it is entirely lacking in the sort of anachronisms one would expect from a Persian or Hellenistic text - it contains no Persian words, no Greek words, and no mention of persons or events later than the early part of the exile. [edit] Archaeological evidenceNo archaeological remains of Solomon's Temple have been found.[7] In the summer of 2007, archeologists overseeing construction at the reputed site of the First Temple reported finding artifacts dated to between the 8th and 6th centuries BCE that, "may be the first physical evidence of human activity at the Temple Mount," at that time.[8] [edit] Comparison with other templesAccording to De Vaux, the Temple has recognizable similarities to other regions. Syro-Phoenician, Egyptian, and Mesopotamian influences are visible, and a plaza or courtyard surrounding the sacred residence of the god, marked with stones, is a feature common throughout ancient Semitic religions. De Vaux found earlier evidence of this practice among the Hebrews surviving in the two stones that Joshua placed at Gilgal (Joshua 4:20) and the marking of Mount Sinai by Moses (Ex. 19:12), and in the forbidden zone surrounding the tent which was the predecessor of the Temple. According to De Vaux, contemporary Muslims' designation of certain areas, especially that surrounding Mecca, as inviolate haram represents a comparable practice.[5] The Biblical text states that Solomon received aid from Hiram, the King of Tyre, in the construction of his buildings. This aid involved not only material (cedarwood, etc.), but architectural direction and skilled craftsmen. According to De Butt, the tripartite division of the Temple is similar to that found in 13th century BCE temples at Alalakh in Syria and Hazor in the upper Galilee. A 9th century BCE temple at Tell Tayinat also follows this plan.[5] Phoenician temples varied somewhat in form, but were similarly surrounded by courts.[citation needed] Among the details which, according to[specify] were probably copied from Tyre, were the two pillars Jachin and Boaz. Herodotus (ii. 44) says that the temple at Tyre contained two such pillars, one of old tin. According to most translations of 1 Kings 7:13-22, the two pillars of Solomon's Temple were cast of brass, though some believe[9][10] the original Hebrew word used to describe their material, "nehosheth", is actually either bronze or copper, because the Hebrews were unfamiliar with the metal zinc, which along with copper, is required to create brass. The ornamentation of palm trees and cherubim were also probably derived from Tyre, because Ezekiel (28:13, 14) represents the King of Tyre, who was high priest also, as being in the "garden of God". Probably both at Tyre and at Jerusalem the cherubim and palm tree ornaments were remnants of an earlier conception—that the abode of God was a "garden of Eden." The Tyrians, therefore, in their temple imitated to some extent the primitive garden, and Solomon borrowed these features.[citation needed] The Solomonic Temple's plan has also been compared to that of the Ain Dara temple. [edit] Other Near Eastern templesSeveral temples in Mesopotamia, many in Egypt, and some of the Phoenicians are now known. In Babylonia the characteristic feature was a ziggurat, or terraced tower, evidently intended to imitate the mountains on which the gods resided. The chamber for the divine dwelling was at its top. The early Egyptian temples consisted of buildings containing two or three rooms, the innermost of which was the abode of the deity. A good example is the granite temple near the sphinx at Giza. The Middle Kingdom (12th dynasty) added obelisks and pylons, and the New Kingdom (18th dynasty) hypostyle halls. Solomon's Temple was not a copy of any of these, nor of the Phoenician buildings, but embodied features derived from all of them. It was on the summit of a hill, like the altar of Ba'al on Mount Carmel and the sanctuaries of Mount Hermon, and like the Babylonian idea of the divine abode. It was surrounded by courts, like the Phoenician temples and the splendid temple of Der al-Bakri at Thebes. Its general form is reminiscent of Egyptian sanctuaries and closely matches that of other temples in the region, as described above.[citation needed] According to[specify], the two pillars Jachin and Boaz had their parallel not only at Tyre but at Byblos, Paphos, and Telloh. In Egypt the obelisks expressed the same idea. The Jewish Encyclopedia stated that "All these were phallic emblems, being survivals of the primitive Hamito-Semitic maẓẓebah",[11] Jachin and Boaz were really isolated columns, as Schick has shown,[12] and not, as some have supposed, a part of the ornamentation of the building. Their tops were crowned with ornamentation as if they were lamps; and W. R. Smith supposed (l.c. p. 488[specify]) that they may have been used as fire-altars, positing that they may have contained cressets for burning the fat. [edit] Influence on later buildingsMany later buildings have been designed as replicas of Solomon's Temple. The structure of this temple and its successor built by Herod the Great was an influence in Juan Bautista de Toledo's design for the Escorial Monastery in Spain (1563-1584).[14] The 6th-century Church of St. Polyeuctus in Constantinople was also said to have been built with the dimensions of the Temple in mind.[15] Modern temple architecture of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has influences from Christian interpretations of biblical descriptions of Solomon's Temple. Each of the 130 operating temples has a baptismal font which is supported by 12 oxen patterned after the brazen Sea described in 1 Kings 7:23-26. Three of the church's early temples exteriors were patterned loosely on the design of Solomon's Temple.[citation needed] [edit] Modern eventsOn 27 December 2004, it was reported[who?] that the Israel Museum in Jerusalem had alleged that the ivory pomegranate that some scholars believed had once adorned a sceptre used by the high priest in Solomon's Temple might not be related to the Temple. This artifact was the most important item of biblical antiquities in its collection; it had been part of a traveling exhibition at the Canadian Museum of Civilization in 2003. The report described the thumb-sized pomegranate, which is a mere 44 millimetres (1.7 in) in height, as being inscribed "... with ancient Hebrew letters said to spell out the words 'Sacred donation for the priests in the House of YHVH'". The Israel Museum now believes that the artifact actually dates back to the 14th or 13th century BCE, and that the inscription is a modern forgery. Some experts fear that this discovery is part of an international fraud in antiquities; Israeli authorities have charged five people.[16] On 3 May 2007, in Jerusalem, a group of American, French, and Israeli scholars met in an attempt to resolve differences over whether the Ivory Pomegranate Inscription was authentic or a forgery. The scholars were not able to reach a conclusive result.[17] [edit] Historical depictions and notable mentions
[edit] See also
[edit] Footnotes
[edit] General references
[edit] Further reading
[edit] External links
Coordinates: 31°46′40.53″N 35°14′7.23″E / 31.777925°N 35.2353417°E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |