| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Executive Control Executive Function Executive Dysfunction northeastcenter.com | Dr. Advertising Agency - Medical Ad Agency - Healthcare Ad Agency -... healthcaresuccess.com | Alpha Listing of Agency Executives - NASHC.org! nashc.org | IVF| Donor Egg Agency| Gestational Surrogate Agencies| Legal Help ebfertility.com |
An executive agency, also known as a next-step agency, is a part of a government department that is treated as managerially and budgetarily separate in order to carry out some part of the executive functions of the United Kingdom government, Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly or Northern Ireland Executive. Executive agencies are "machinery of government" devices distinct both from Non-ministerial government departments and non-departmental public bodies (or "quangos"), each of which enjoy a real legal and constitutional separation from ministerial control. The model was also applied in several other countries. [edit] Size and scopeAgencies[1] range from Her Majesty's Prison Service to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. The largest agency in terms of staff numbers is Jobcentre Plus, employing 100,000 people. The annual budget for each agency, allocated by Her Majesty's Treasury ranges from a few million pounds for the smallest agencies to £700m for the Court Service to £4bn for Jobcentre Plus. Virtually all government departments have at least one agency. The Ministry of Defence has 9, the most of any department. [edit] Issues and reportsThe initial success or otherwise of executive agencies was examined in the Sir Angus Fraser's Fraser Report of 1991. Its main goal was to identify what good practices had emerged from the new model and spread them to other agencies and departments. The report also recommended further powers be devolved from ministers to chief executives. A whole series of reports and white papers examining governmental delivery were published throughout the 1990s, under both Conservative and Labour governments. During these the agency model became the standard model for delivering public services in the United Kingdom. By 1997 76% of civil servants were employed by an agency. The new Labour government in its first such report – the 1998 Next Steps Report endorsed the model introduced by its predecessor. The most recent review (in 2002, linked below) made two central conclusions (their emphasis):
The latter point, is usually made more forcibly by Government critics, describing agencies as "unaccountable quangos". [edit] List of executive agencies by department[edit] Attorney General’s Office[edit] Business, Innovation and Skills (Department for)
[edit] Cabinet Office[edit] Communities and Local Government (Department for)[edit] Culture, Media and Sport (Department for)[edit] Defence (Ministry of)
[edit] Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Department for)
[edit] Food Standards Agency (a non-ministerial department)[edit] Foreign and Commonwealth Office[edit] Health (Department of)[edit] Home Department (Home Office)[edit] Justice (Ministry of)
[edit] Northern Ireland Office
[edit] Transport (Department for)
[edit] Treasury (HM)
[edit] Work and Pensions (Department for)
[edit] Agencies with no parent department[edit] Other countriesSeveral other countries experimented with the executive agency model, often with mixed results. In the United States, the Clinton administration imported the model, but with a modification of the name to "performance-based organizations."[3] In Canada, executive agencies were adopted on a limited basis under the name "special operating agencies."[4] Executive agencies were also established in Japan and Jamaica. [edit] See also
[edit] External references
[edit] References
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |