Elite theory is a theory of the state which seeks to describe and explain the power relationships in modern society. It argues that a small minority, consisting of members of the economic elite and policy-planning networks, holds the most power independent of a state's democratic elections process. Through positions in corporations or on corporate boards, and influence over the policy-planning networks through financial support of foundations or positions with think tanks or policy-discussion groups, members of the "elite" are able to exert significant power over policy decisions of corporations and governments.

The theory stands in opposition to pluralism in suggesting that democracy is a utopian ideal. It also stands in opposition to state autonomy theory.

Contents 1 Classical Elite theory 2 Classical Elite Theorists 2.1 Vilfredo Pareto 2.2 Gaetano Mosca 2.3 Robert Michels 3 Elite theorists 3.1 C. Wright Mills 3.2 Floyd Hunter 3.3 G. William Domhoff 3.4 James Burnham 3.5 Robert D. Putnam 4 References 5 External Links 6 Bibliography 7 See also

[edit] Classical Elite theory

The aristocratic version of this theory is the Classic Elite Theory which is based on two ideas:

1. power lies in position of authority in key economic and political institutions
2. the psychological difference that sets Elites apart is that they have personal resources , for instance intelligence and skills, and a vested interest in the government; while the rest are incompetent and do not have the capabilities of governing themselves, the elite are resourceful and will strive to make the government to work. For in reality, the elite have the most to lose in a failed government.

[edit] Classical Elite Theorists

[edit] Vilfredo Pareto

Pareto emphasized the psychological and intellectual superiority that the Elites obtained, he believed that the elites were the highest accomplishers in any field and he discussed how there were two types of Elites

1. governing elites;
2. non-governing elites.

He also extended on the idea that a whole elite can be replaced by a new one and how one can circulate from being elite to nonelite.

[edit] Gaetano Mosca

Mosca emphasized on the sociological and personal characteristics of elites, he said they were an organized minority and how masses are the unorganized majority. The ruling class is composed of the ruling Elite and the sub-Elites. He divided the world into two groups

1. ruling class;
2. class that is ruled.

Elites have intellectual, moral, and material superiority that is highly esteemed and influential.

[edit] Robert Michels

Michels developed the Iron Law of Oligarchy where social and political organizations are run by few individuals, he said that social organization is key as well as the division of labor so elites were the ones that ruled. He believed that all organizations were elitist and that elites have three basic principles that help in the bureaucratic structure of political organization

1. need for leaders, specialized staff and facilities;
2. utilization of facilities by leaders within their organization;
3. the importance of the psychological attributes of the leaders.

[edit] Elite theorists

[edit] C. Wright Mills

Mills published his book The Power Elite in 1956 claiming a new perspective on systems of power in the United States. He identified a triumvirate of power groups – political, economic and military – which form a distinguishable, although not unified, power wielding body in the American state.

Mills proposed that this group had been generated through a process of rationalisation at work in all advanced industrial societies whereby the mechanisms of power became concentrated funnelling overall control into the hands of a limited, somewhat corrupt group.^[1] This reflected a decline in politics as an arena for debate and relegation to a merely formal level of discourse.^[2] This macro-scale analysis sought to point out the degradation of democracy in "advanced" societies and the fact that power generally lies outside the boundaries of elected representatives. A main influence for the study was Franz Leopold Neumanns book, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism in 1942, a study how Nazism come in position of power in a democratic state as Germany. It had give him the tools to grasp and analyse the entire total structure and as a warning what could happen in a modern capitalistic democracy.

[edit] Floyd Hunter

The elite theory analysis of power was also applied on the micro scale in community power studies such as that by Floyd Hunter (1953). Hunter examined in detail the power relationships evident in his "Regional City" looking for the "real" holders of power rather than those in obvious official positions. He posited a structural-functional approach which mapped the hierarchies and webs of interconnection operating within the city – mapping relationships of power between businessmen, politicians, clergy etc. The study was promoted to debunk current concepts of any ‘democracy’ present within urban politics and reaffirm the arguments for a true representative democracy ^[3].

This type of analysis was also used in later, larger scale, studies such as that carried out by M. Schwartz examining the power structures within the sphere of the corporate elite in the USA.^[4]

[edit] G. William Domhoff

In his controversial book "Who Rules America?", G. William Domhoff researched the power structure in the United states. He claims (agreeing mostly with Hunters work) that an elite class that owns and manages large income-producing properties (like banks and corporations) dominate the Amercian power structure politically and economically ^[5].

Domhoff researched the local as well as national decision making processes.

[edit] James Burnham

Burnham’s early work The Managerial Revolution sought to express the movement of all functional power into the hands of managers rather than politicians or businessmen – separating ownership and control.^[6] Many of these ideas were adapted by paleoconservatives Samuel T. Francis and Paul Gottfried in their theories of the managerial state.

[edit] Robert D. Putnam

Putnam saw the development of technical and exclusive knowledge among administrators and other specialist groups as a mechanism by which power is stripped from the democratic process and slipped sideways to the advisors and specialists influencing the decision making process.^[7]

"If the dominant figures of the past hundred years have been the entrepreneur, the businessman, and the industrial executive, the ‘new men’ are the scientists, the mathematicians, the economists, and the engineers of the new intellectual technology."^[8]

[edit] References

[edit] External Links

• "Who Rules America?" website

[edit] Bibliography

• Bottomore, T. (1993) Elites and Society (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.
• Burnham, J. (1960) The Managerial Revolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Hunter, Floyd (1953) Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers.
• Domhoff. G. William (1967 - 2009) Who Rules America? McGraw-Hill.
• Mills, C. Wright (1956) The Power Elite.
• Neumann, Franz Leopold (1944). Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933 - 1944. Harper.
• Putnam, R. D. (1976) The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Putnam, R. D. (1977) ‘Elite Transformation in Advance Industrial Societies: An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy’ in Comparative Political Studies Vol. 10, No. 3, pp383–411.
• Schwartz, M. (ed.) (1987) The Structure of Power in America: The Corporate Elite as a Ruling Class. New York: Holmes & Meier.

[edit] See also

• Iron law of oligarchy
• Positive political theory
• Michael Parenti
• Mass society
• The Power Elite