Doctrine of lapse Information & Doctrine of lapse Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Criticism to the Double Effect Doctrine
Criticism to the Double Effect Doctrine
hospicecare.com
  Lapse d License Application - Board of Registration in Medicine
Lapsed License Application - Board of Registration in Medicine
massmedboard.org
 Time-Lapse Videos of Hospital Construction Progress
Time-Lapse Videos of Hospital Construction Progress
spotsrmc.com
  Lapse and Relapse Panic Button
Lapse and Relapse Panic Button
morethanadiet.com
 

The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy purportedly devised (see below about Kittur) by Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General of India between 1848 and 1856. According to the Doctrine, any princely state or territory under the direct influence (paramountcy) of the British East India Company (the dominant imperial power in the subcontinent), as a vassal state under the British Subsidiary System, would automatically be annexed if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a direct heir".[1] The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its application were widely regarded by Indians as illegitimate.

At the time of its adoption, the Company had absolute, imperial administrative jurisdiction over many regions spread over the subcontinent. The company took over the princely states of Satara (1848), Jaipur and Sambalpur (1849), Nagpur and Jhansi (1854) and Awadh (Oudh) (1856) using this Doctrine. The Company added about four million pounds sterling to its annual revenue by use of this doctrine.[2]

With the increasing power of the East India Company, discontent simmered amongst many sections of Indian society and the largely indigenous armed forces; these rallied behind the deposed dynasties during the Indian rebellion of 1857 (known by British as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857). Following the rebellion, in 1858, the new British Viceroy of India, whose rule replaced that of the British East India Company, renounced the doctrine.[3]

Princely state of Kittur was takenover by East India Company in 1824 by imposing 'Doctrine Of Lapse'--so it is debatable that whether it was actually devised by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, though he arguably did make it official by putting it to paper-and-ink.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Keay, John. India: A History. Grove Press Books, distributed by Publishers Group West. United States: 2000 ISBN 0-8021-3797-0, p. 433.
  2. ^ Wolpert, Stanley. A New History of India (3rd ed., 1989), pp. 226-28. Oxford University Press.
  3. ^ Wolpert (1989), p. 240.

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Kittur+Chennamma




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots