| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
A divisibility rule is a method that can be used to determine whether a number is evenly divisible by other numbers. Divisibility rules are a shortcut for testing a number's factors without resorting to division calculations. Although divisibility rules can be created for any base, only rules for decimal are given here.
For divisors with multiple rules, the rules are generally ordered first for those appropriate for numbers with many digits, then those useful for numbers with fewer digits. If the result is not obvious after applying it once, the rule should be applied again to the result.
[edit] Step-by-step examples of 2 through 7[edit] Divisibility by 2First, take any number (for this example it will be 376) and note the last digit in the number, discarding the other digits. Then take that digit (6) while ignoring the rest of the number and determine if it is divisible by 2. If it is divisible by 2, then the original number is divisible by 2. Ex.
Example: Is 6 divisible by 2? [edit] Divisibility by 3First, take any number (for this example it will be 492) and add together each digit in the number (4 + 9 + 2 = 15). Then take that sum (15) and determine if it is divisible by 3. If the final number is divisible by 3, then the original number is divisible by 3. If a number is a multiplication of 3 consecutive numbers then that number is always divisible by 3. This is useful for when the number takes the form of ( n x (n-1) x (n+1) ) Ex.
Ex.
[edit] Divisibility by 4The basic rule for divisibility by 4 is that if the number formed by the last two digits in a number is divisible by 4, the original number is divisible by 4; this is because 100 is divisible by 4 and so adding hundreds, thousands, etc. is simply adding another number that is divisible by 4. If any number ends in a two digit number that you know is divisible by 4, (i.e. 24, 04, 8, etc.) then the whole number will be divisible by 4 regardless of what is before the last two digits. First, take any number (for this example it will be 5,096) and note the last two digits in the number, discarding any other digits. Then take that number (96), double the tens digit (2 × 9 = 18), and add the ones digit (18 + 6 = 24). Since 24 is divisible by 4, so is the original two-digit number, 96 — and, therefore, so is the original number, 5,096. (If it's not clear that 24 is divisible by 4, repeat the process: 2 × 2 = 4, and 4 + 4 = 8, which is divisible by 4.) Alternatively, one can simply divide the number by 2, and then check the result to find if it is divisible by 2. If it is, the original number is divisible by 4. In addition, the result of this test is the same as the original number divided by 4. Ex.
Alternative Ex.
[edit] Divisibility by 5Divisibility by 5 is easily determined by checking the last digit in the number (475), and seeing if it is either 0 or 5. If the last number is either 0 or 5, the entire number is divisible by 5. If the last digit in the number is 0, then the result will be the remaining digits multiplied by two (2). For example, the number forty (40) ends in a zero (0), so take the remaining digits (4) and multiply that by two (4 × 2=8). The result is the same as the result of forty divided by five (40/5=8). If the last digit in the number is 5, then the result will be the remaining digits multiplied by two (2), plus one (1). For example, the number one hundred and twenty five (125) ends in a five (5), so take the remaining digits (12), multiply them by two (12 × 2=24), then add one (24+1=25). The result is the same as the result of one hundred and twenty five divided by five (125/5=25). Ex.
If the last digit is 5
Example: IS 13 divisible by 5? No , because the # doesn't end in a 0 or a 5. [edit] Divisibility by 6Divisibility by 6 is determined by checking the original number to see if it is both an even number (divisible by 2) and divisible by 3. This is the best test to use. Alternatively, one can check for divisibility by six by taking the number (246), dropping the last digit in the number (24 If the number is divisible by six, take the original number (246) and divide it by two (246 ÷ 2 = 123). Then, take that result and divide it by three (123 ÷ 3 = 41). This result is the same as the original number divided by six (246 ÷ 6 = 41). Ex.
[edit] Divisibility by 7Divisibility by 7 can be tested by a method which is recursive. Writing a number in the form 10x+y it is divisible by 7 if and only if x-2y is divisible by 7. This rule says: take the original number (371), form the number consisting of all the digits of the original number except the last digit (37) and subtract from it twice the last digit (2 x 1). Continue to do this until a small number (below 20 in absolute value) is obtained. Then the original number is divisible by 7 if and only if the number obtained using this procedure is divisible by 7 (371 → 37-2=35 → 3-10=-7, hence 371 is divisible by 7 since -7 is). A more complicated algorithm for testing divisibility by 7 uses the fact that 100 ≡ 1, 101 ≡ 3, 10² ≡ 2, 10³ ≡ 6, 104 ≡ 4, 105 ≡ 5, 106 ≡ 1, ... (mod 7). Take each digit of the number (371) in reverse order (173), multiplying them successively by the digits 1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, repeating with this sequence of multipliers as long as necessary (1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, ...), and adding the products (1x1 + 7x3 + 3x2 = 1 + 21 + 6 = 28). The original number is divisible by 7 if and only if the number obtained using this procedure is divisible by 7 (hence 371 is divisible by 7 since 28 is).[1] This method can be simplified by removing the need to multiply. All it would take with this simplification is to memorise the sequence above (132645...), and to add and subtract, but always working with one-digit numbers. The simplification goes as follows:
If through this procedure you obtain a 0 or any recognisable multiple of 7, then the original number is a multiple of 7. If you obtain any number from 1 to 6, that will indicate how much you should subtract from the original number to get a multiple of 7. In other words, you will find the remainder of dividing the number by 7. For example take the number 186:
Now we have a number lower than 7, and this number (4) is the remainder of dividing 186/7. So 186 minus 4, which is 182 must be a multiple of 7. Note: The reason why this works is that if we have: a+b=c and b is a multiple of any given number n, then a and c will necessarily produce the same remainder when divided by n. In other words, in 2+7=9, 7 is divisible by 7. So 2 and 9 must have the same reminder when divided by 7. The remainder is 2. Therefore, if a number n is a multiple of 7 (i.e.: the remainder of n/7 is 0), then adding (or subtracting) multiples of 7 cannot possibly change that property. What this procedure does, as explained above for most divisibility rules, is simply subtract little by little multiples of 7 from the original number until reaching a number that is small enough for us to remember if it is a multiple of 7 or not. If 1 becomes a 3 in the following decimal position, that is just the same as converting 10x10n into a 3x10n. And that is actually the same as subtracting 7x10n (clearly a multiple of 7) from 10x10n. Similarly, when you turn a 3 into a 2 in the following decimal position, you are turning 30x10n into 2x10n, which is the same as subtracting 30x10n-28x10n, and this is again subtracting a multiple of 7. The same reason applies for all the remaining conversions:
First Method Example Second Method Example Vedic Method of Divisibility by Osculation Vedic Method Example: Is 438,722,025 divisible by seven? Multiplier = 5. 4 3 8 7 2 2 0 2 5 42 37 46 37 6 40 37 27 YES Pohlman-Mass Method of Divisibility by Seven Step A: If the integer is 1,000 or less, subtract twice the last digit from the number formed by the remaining digits. If the result is a multiple of seven, then so is the original number (and vice versa). For example: 112 -> 11 - (2*2) = 11 - 4 = 7 YES 98 -> 9 - (8*2) = 9 - 16 = -7 YES 634 -> 63 - (4*2) = 63 - 8 = 55 NO Because 1,001 is divisible by seven, an interesting pattern develops for repeating sets of 1, 2, or 3 digits that form 6-digit numbers (leading zeros are allowed) in that all such numbers are divisible by seven. For example: 001 001 = 1,001 / 7 = 143 010 010 = 10,010 / 7 = 1,430 011 011 = 11,011 / 7 = 1,573 100 100 = 100,100 / 7 = 14,300 101 101 = 101,101 / 7 = 14,443 110 110 = 110,110 / 7 = 15,730 01 01 01 = 10,101 / 7 = 1,443 10 10 10 = 101,010 / 7 = 14,430 111,111 / 7 = 15,873 222,222 / 7 = 31,746 999,999 / 7 = 142,857 576,576 / 7 = 82,368 For all of the above examples, subtracting the first thee digits from the last three results in a multiple of seven. Notice that leading zeros are permitted to form a 6-digit pattern. This phenomenon forms the basis for Steps B and C. Step B: If the integer is between 1,001 and one million, find a repeating pattern of 1, 2, or 3 digits that forms a 6-digit number that is close to the integer (leading zeros are allowed and can help you visualize the pattern). If the positive difference is less than 1,000, apply Step A. This can be done by subtracting the first three digits from the last three digits. For example: 341,355 - 341,341 = 14 -> 1 - (4*2) = 1 - 8 = -7 YES 67,326 - 067,067 = 259 -> 25 - (9*2) = 25 - 18 = 7 YES The fact that 999,999 is a multiple of 7 can be used for determining divisibility of integers larger than one million by reducing the integer to a 6-digit number that can be determined using Step B. This can be done easily by adding the digits left of the first six to the last six and follow with Step A. Step C: If the integer is larger than one million, subtract the nearest multiple of 999,999 and then apply Step B. For even larger numbers, use larger sets such as 12-digits (999,999,999,999) and so on. Then, break the integer into a smaller number that can be solved using Step B. For example: 22,862,420 - (999,999 * 22) = 22,862,420 - 21,999,978 -> 862,420 + 22 = 862,442 862,442 -> 862 - 442 (Step B) = 420 -> 42 - (0*2) (Step A) = 42 YES This allows adding and subtracting alternating sets of three digits to determine divisibility by seven. Understanding these patterns allows you to quickly calculate divisibility of seven as seen in the following examples: Pohlman-Mass Method of Divisibility of Seven Examples: Is 98 divisible by seven? 98 -> 9 - (8*2) = 9 - 16 = -7 YES (Step A) Is 634 divisible by seven? 634 -> 63 - (4*2) = 63 - 8 = 55 NO (Step A) Is 355,341 divisible by seven? 355,341 - 341,341 = 14,000 (Step B) -> 014 - 000 (Step B) -> 14 = 1 - (4*2) (Step A) = 1 - 8 = -7 YES Is 42,341,530 divisible by seven? 42,341,530 -> 341,530 + 42 = 341,572 (Step C) 341,572 - 341,341 = 231 (Step B) 231 -> 23 - (1*2) = 23 - 2 = 21 YES (Step A) Using quick alternating additions and subtractions: 42,341,530 -> 530 - 341 = 189 + 42 = 231 -> 23 - (1*2) = 21 YES
7 - (1, 3, 2, -1, -3, -2, cycle repeats for the next six digits) Period: 6 digits. Recurring numbers: 1, 3, 2, -1, -3, -2 Multiply the right most digit by the left most digit in the sequence and multiply the second right most digit by the second left most digit in the sequence and so on and so for. Next, compute the sum of all the values and take the modulus of 7.
This method uses 1, -3, 2 pattern on the digit pairs. That is, the divisibility of any number by seven can be tested by first separating the number into digit pairs, and then applying the algorithm on three digit pairs (six digits). When the number is smaller than six digits, then fill zero’s to the right side until there are six digits. When the number is larger than six digits, then repeat the cycle on the next six digit group and then add the results. Repeat the algorithm until the result is a small number. The original number is divisible by seven if and only if the number obtained using this algorithm is divisible by seven. This method is especially suitable for large numbers. (created by Nikolay Khachaturian, 2007) Example 1: Example 2: [edit] Divisibility by 13Remainder Test 13 (1, -3, -4, -1, 3, 4, cycle goes on.) If you are not comfortable with negative number, then use this sequence. (1, 10, 9, 12, 3, 4) Multiply the right most digit of the number with the left most number in the sequence shown above and the second right most digit to the second left most digit of the number in the sequence. The cycle goes on. Example: What is the remainder when 321 is divided by 13? Example: What is the remainder when 1234567 is divided by 13? [edit] Beyond 20Divisibility properties can be determined in two ways, depending on the type of the divisor. Composite divisors A composite divisor may also have a rule formed using the same procedure as for a prime divisor, given below, with the caveat that the manipulations involved may not introduce any factor which is present in the divisor. For instance, one can not make a rule for 14 that involves multiplying the equation by 7. This is not an issue for prime divisors because they have no smaller factors. Prime Divisors Notable examples
[edit] Proofs[edit] Proof using basic algebraMany of the simpler rules can be produced using only algebraic manipulation, creating binomials and rearranging them. By writing a number as the sum of each digit times a power of 10 each digit's power can be manipulated individually. Case where all digits are summed This method works for divisors that are factors of 10 − 1 = 9. Using 3 as an example, 3 divides 9 = 10 − 1. That means which is exactly the sum of the digits. Case where the alternating sum of digits is used This method works for divisors that are factors of 10 + 1 = 11. Using 11 as an example, 11 divides 11 = 10 + 1. That means Like the previous case, we can substitute powers of 10 with congruent values: which is also the difference between the sum of digits at odd positions and the sum of digits at even positions. Case where only the last digit(s) matter This applies to divisors that are a factor of a power of 10. This is because sufficiently high powers of the base are multiples of the divisor, and can be eliminated. For example, in base 10, the factors of 101 include 2, 5, and 10. Therefore, divisibility by 2, 5, and 10 only depend on whether the last 1 digit is divisible by those divisors. The factors of 102 include 4 and 25, and divisibility by those only depend on the last 2 digits. Case where only the last digit(s) are removed Most numbers do not divide 9 or 10 evenly, but do divide a higher power of 10n or 10n − 1. In this case the number is still written in powers of 10, but not fully expanded. For example, 7 does not divide 9 or 10, but does divide 98, which is close to 100. Thus, proceed from where in this case a is any integer, and b can range from 0 to 99. Next, and again expanding and after eliminating the known multiple of 7, the result is which is the rule "double the number formed by all but the last two digits, then add the last two digits". Case where the last digit(s) is multiplied by a factor The representation of the number may also be multiplied by any number relatively prime to the divisor without changing its divisibility. After observing that 7 divides 21, we can perform the following: after multiplying by 2, this becomes and then Eliminating the 21 gives and multiplying by −1 gives
Either of the last two rules may be used, depending on which is easier to perform. They correspond to the rule "subtract twice the last digit from the rest". [edit] Proof using modular arithmeticThis section will illustrate the basic method; all the rules can be derived following the same procedure. The following requires a basic grounding in modular arithmetic; for divisibility other than by 2's and 5's the proofs rest on the basic fact that 10 mod m is invertible if 10 and m are relatively prime. For 2n or 5n: Only the last n digits need to be checked. Representing x as and the divisibility of x is the same as that of z. For 7: Since 10 × 5 ≡ 10 × (−2) ≡ 1 (mod 7) we can do the following: Representing x as
[edit] References
[edit] External links |
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |