Diamond principle Information & Diamond principle Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Used Altair Instruments Diamond Tome - Used Diamond Tome System For Sale
Used Altair Instruments Diamond Tome - Used Diamond Tome System For Sale
medproonline.com
 Commercial Gym Flooring - Diamond Plate Rubber Tiles, Diamond Plate...
Commercial Gym Flooring - Diamond Plate Rubber Tiles, Diamond Plate...
ironcompany.com
 Best Peronal Trainer in Diamond Bar - Personal Fitness Training Diamond
Best Peronal Trainer in Diamond Bar - Personal Fitness Training Diamond
fitconcepts.com
 

In mathematics, and particularly in axiomatic set theory, the diamond principle ◊ is a combinatorial principle introduced by Jensen (1972) that holds in the constructible universe and that implies the continuum hypothesis. Jensen extracted the diamond principle from his proof that V=L implies the existence of a Suslin tree.

Contents

[edit] Definition

The diamond principle ◊ says that there exists a ◊-sequence, in other words sets Aα⊆α for α<ω1 such that for any subset A of ω1 the set of α with A∩α = Aα is stationary in ω1.

More generally, or a given cardinal number κ and a stationary set  S\subseteq\kappa , the statement ◊S (sometimes written ◊(S) or ◊κ(S)) is the statement that there is a sequence \langle A_\alpha: \alpha \in S \rangle such that

  • each  A_\alpha \subseteq \alpha
  • for every  A \subseteq \kappa, \{\alpha \in S: A \cap \alpha = A_\alpha\} is stationary in κ

The principle ◊ω1 is the same as ◊.

[edit] Properties and use

Jensen (1972) showed that the diamond principle ◊ implies the existence of Suslin trees. He also showed that ◊ implies the CH. Also + CH implies ◊, but Shelah gave models of ♣ + ¬ CH, so ◊ and ♣ are not equivalent (rather, ♣ is weaker than ◊).

Akemann & Weaver (2004) used ◊ to construct a C*-algebra serving as a counterexample to Naimark's problem.

For all cardinals κ and stationary subsets  S \subseteq \kappa^+ , ◊S holds in the constructible universe. Recently Shelah proved that for \kappa>\aleph_0, ◊κ+ follows from 2κ = κ + .

[edit] See also

[edit] References




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots