Competitive inhibition Information & Competitive inhibition Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Enzyme Inhibitor s (ACE inhibitor s,...
Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE inhibitors,...
virtualgastrocentre.com
 Enzyme Inhibitor s (ACE inhibitor s,...
Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE inhibitors,...
virtualchildshealth.com
 Enzyme Inhibitor s (ACE inhibitor s,...
Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE inhibitors,...
virtualneurocentre.com
 

Competitive inhibition is a form of enzyme inhibition where binding of the inhibitor to the enzyme prevents binding of the substrate and vice versa.

Contents

[edit] Mechanism

Diagram showing competitive inhibition

In competitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds only the free enzyme, and cannot bind when the substrate is bound (in other words, it cannot bind the enzyme-substrate complex). In virtually all cases, competitive inhibitors bind in the same binding site as the substrate, but same-site binding is not a requirement. A competitive inhibitor could bind to an allosteric site of the free enzyme and prevent substrate binding, as long as it cannot bind to the allosteric site when the substrate is bound. In competitive inhibition, the maximum velocity (Vmax) of the reaction is unchanged, while the apparent affinity of the substrate to the binding site is decreased (it means: the Kd dissociation constant is apparently increased). The change in Km (Michaelis-Menten constant) is parallel to the alteration in Kd. Any given competitive inhibitor concentration can be overcome by increasing the substrate concentration in which case the substrate will outcompete the inhibitor in binding to the enzyme.

[edit] Equation

\text{apparent } K_m=K_m\times \left(1+\frac{[I]}{K_I}\right)

Vmax remains the same because the presence of the inhibitor can be overcome by higher substrate concentrations.

where KI is the inhibitors dissociation constant and [I] is the substrate concentration.

[edit] Derivation

In the simplest case of a single-substrate enzyme obeying Michaelis-Menten kinetics, the typical scheme

E + S <==> ES ---> E + P

is modified to include binding of the inhibitor to the free enzyme:

EI + S <==> E + I + S <==> ES + I --> E + P + I

Note that the inhibitor does not bind to the ES complex and the substrate does not bind to the EI complex. It is generally assumed that this behavior is indicative of both compounds binding at the same site, but that is not strictly necessary. To derive the equation describing the kinetics, first assign microscopic rate constants to each step:

k1 = E + S --> ES
k−1 = ES --> E + S
k2 = ES --> E + P
k3 = E + I --> EI
k−3 = EI --> E + I

Just as with the derivation of the Michaelis-Menten equation, assume that the system is at steady-state, that is that the concentration of each of the enzyme species is not changing.

\frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}ES = \frac{d}{dt}{EI} = 0.

Furthermore, the known total enzyme concentration is ET = E + ES + EI, the velocity is measured under conditions in which the substrate and inhibitor concentrations do not change substantially and an insignificant amount of product has accumulated.

We can therefore set up a system of equations:

eq 1: ET = E + ES + EI
eq 2:  \frac{dE}{dt} = 0 = -k_1*E*S + k_{-1}*ES + k_2*ES -k_3*E*I + k_{-3}*EI
eq 3:  \frac{dES}{dt} = 0 = k_1*E*S - k_{-1}*ES - k_2*ES
eq 4:  \frac{dEI}{dt} = 0 = k_3*E*I - k_{-3}*EI

where S, I and ET are known. The initial velocity is defined as v = dP/dt = k2 ES, so we need to define the unknown ES in terms of the knowns S, I and ET.

From eq 3, we can define E in terms of ES by rearranging to

k1 * E * S = (k − 1 + k2) * ES

Dividing by k1 S gives

 E = \frac{(k_{-1}+k_2)*ES}{k_1*S}

As in the derivation of the Michaelis-Menten equation, the term (k-1+k2)/k1 can be replaced by the macroscopic rate constant Km:

eq 5:  E = \frac{K_m*ES}{S}

Substituting eq 5 into eq 4, we have

 0 = \frac{k_3*I*K_m*ES}{S} - k_{-3}*EI

Rearranging, we find that

 EI = \frac{k_3*I*K_m*ES}{S*k_{-3}}

At this point, we can define the dissociation constant for the inhibitor as Ki = k−3/k3, giving

eq 6:  EI = \frac{I*K_m*ES}{S*K_i}

At this point, substitute eq 5 and eq 6 into eq 1:

 E_T = K_m*\frac{ES}{S} + ES + \frac{I*K_m*ES}{S*K_i}

Rearranging to solve for ES, we find

E_T = ES*( \frac{K_m}{S} + 1 + \frac{I*K_m}{S*K_i} )= ES* \frac{K_m*K_i+S*K_i+I*K_m}{S*K_i}

=> eq 7: ES = \frac{E_T*S*K_i}{K_m*K_i+S*K_i+I*K_m}

Returning to our expression for v, we now have:  v = k_2*ES = \frac{k_2*E_T*S*K_i}{K_m*K_i+S*K_i+I*K_m}

Rearranging and replacing k2 with kcat, we have

 v = \frac{k_{cat}*E_T*S}{K_m + S + K_m*(I/K_i)}

Finally, we can replace kcat*ET with Vmax and combine terms to yield the conventional form:

 v = \frac{V_{max}*S}{S + K_m*(1 + I/K_i)}

[edit] See also




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots