| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Cervical Collar, Neck Collars, Soft Cervical Collar Philadelphia medicalsupplygroup.com | Hard Cervical Collar,Rigid Cervical Collar,Cervical Hard Collar,Cervical indianorthopaedic.com |
A collar is an investment strategy that uses options to limit the range of possible positive or negative returns on an investment in an asset to a specific range. To do this, an investor who owns an asset simultaneously buys a put option and sells (writes) a call option on the same asset. The strike price on the call needs to be above the strike price for the put, and the expiration dates should be the same. After establishing the portfolio in this manner, the market value of the portfolio will be between the strike price on the call and the strike price on the put. Thus possible gains and losses (the value of the portfolio minus the cost of acquiring it) are confined within a specified range. [edit] ExampleConsider an investor who owns one share of a stock with a current price of $5. An investor could construct a collar by buying one put with a strike price of $3 and selling one call with a strike price of $7. The collar would ensure that the gain on the portfolio will be no higher than $2 and the loss will be no worse than $2 (before deducting the net cost of the put option, i.e., the cost of the put option less what is received for selling the call option). There are three possible scenarios when the options expire:
[edit] Why do this?In times of high volatility, or in bear markets, it can be useful to limit the downside risk to a portfolio. One obvious way to do this is to sell the stock. In the above example, if an investor just sold the stock, the investor would get $5. This may be fine, but it poses additional questions. Does the investor have an acceptable investment available to put the money from the sale into? What are the transaction costs associated with liquidating the portfolio? Would the investor rather just hold onto the stock? What are the tax consequences? If it makes more sense to hold on to the stock (or other underlying asset), the investor can limit that downside risk that lies below the strike price on the put in exchange for giving up the upside above the strike price on the call. Another advantage is that the cost of setting up a collar is (usually) free or nearly free. The price received is used for selling the call to buy the put—one pays for the other. Finally, using a collar strategy takes the return from the probable to the definite. That is, when an investor owns a stock (or another underlying asset) and has an expected return, that expected return is only the mean of the distribution of possible returns, weighted by their probability. The investor may get a higher or lower return. When an investor who owns a stock (or other underlying asset) uses a collar strategy, the investor knows that the return can be no higher than the return defined by strike price on the call, and no lower than the return that results from the strike price of the put. [edit] References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |