| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Churnalism is a form of journalism in which press releases, wire stories and other forms of pre-packaged material are used to create articles in newspapers and other news media in order to meet increasing pressures of time and cost without undertaking further research or checking.[1]
[edit] PrevalenceIn his book Flat Earth News,[2] the British journalist Nick Davies reported a study at Cardiff University by Professor Justin Lewis and a team of researchers[3] which found that 80% of the stories in Britain's quality press were not original and that only 12% of stories were generated by reporters.[1] The result is a reduction of quality and accuracy as the articles are open to manipulation and distortion. In the words of the poet Humbert Wolfe,[4]
BBC journalist Waseem Zakir has been credited for coining the term churnalism.[5] According to Zakir, the trend towards this form of journalism involves reporters becoming more reactive and less proactive in searching for news - "You get copy coming in on the wires and reporters churn it out, processing stuff and maybe adding the odd local quote. It's affecting every newsroom in the country and reporters are becoming churnalists."[6] An editorial on the matter in the British Journalism Review saw this trend as terminal for current journalism, "...a harbinger of the end of news journalism as we know it, the coroner's verdict can be nothing other than suicide."[7] Others, such as Peter Preston, former editor of The Guardian, see the issue as over-wrought, saying that there was never a golden age of journalism in which journalists were not subject to such pressures.[8] Churnalism does not only occur in newspapers; for example, Chris Anderson's wide use of "writethroughs" in his book Free has been labelled churnalism,[9] and psychiatrist David Healy has criticised past use of ghost-written copy in academic journals. [edit] Economic causesTraditional newspapers have cut staff as their advertising revenue has declined because of competition from other media such as television and the internet.[10] They no longer have sufficient staff to generate news stories by making the rounds of civic and business activities. Local newspapers and trade magazines are commonly produced by only one or two staff and these rely upon stories which are increasingly brought to them by professional PR representatives, according to a senior public relations professional.[11] When the matter was debated at the Foreign Press Association, it was agreed that there was a relationship between the numbers of PR staff employed and journalists unemployed.[12] [edit] FabricationsA documentary film, Starsuckers, created fake stories about celebrities such as Amy Winehouse, whose hair was said to have caught fire, and Pixie Geldof, who was said to have padded her bra with sweets. Several newspapers including the Daily Express, Daily Mirror, Daily Star and Sun published these hoaxes. The Daily Mail was the only newspaper tested which did not publish any of the fake stories. Once the stories were published, numerous other publications across the world such as Cosmopolitan, the New York Post, the Times of India and Turkish Weekly picked up and recycled the stories. The director, Chris Atkins, said that untrue stories of this kind are now to be found in all news media.[13] [edit] SpeedIn their book, No Time to Think,[14] authors Howard Rosenberg and Charles S. Feldman, emphasised the role of speed in degrading the quality of modern journalism.[15] An example is given of the BBC guide for online staff which gives contradictory advice to ensure good quality but also, "Get the story up as fast as you can… We encourage a sense of urgency—we want to be first."[15] [edit] See also[edit] References
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |