Chebyshev function Information & Chebyshev function Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Kidney Function Tests, Renal function Brisbane Australia
Kidney Function Tests, Renal function Brisbane Australia
brisbaneurology.com.au
 DailyCare Biomedical-Products-Heart Function Care System-Heart Function ...
DailyCare Biomedical-Products-Heart Function Care System-Heart Function...
dcbiomed.com
 the function s of the doshas,dosha,the composition of the doshas,DOSHAS...
the functions of the doshas,dosha,the composition of the doshas,DOSHAS...
healthandyoga.com
  Function of the Skin - Some of the Important Function s of your Skin
Function of the Skin - Some of the Important Functions of your Skin
skin-care-tips.org
 
The Chebyshev function ψ(x), with x < 50
The function ψ(x) − x, for x < 10,000
The function ψ(x) − x, for x < 10 million

In mathematics, the Chebyshev function is either of two related functions. The first Chebyshev function ϑ(x) or θ(x) is given by

\vartheta(x)=\sum_{p\le x} \log p

with the sum extending over all prime numbers p that are less than or equal to x.

The second Chebyshev function ψ(x) is defined similarly, with the sum extending over all prime powers not exceeding x:

 \psi(x) = \sum_{p^k\le x}\log p=\sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n) = \sum_{p\le x}\lfloor\log_p x\rfloor\log p,

where Λ is the von Mangoldt function. The Chebyshev function is often used in proofs related to prime numbers, because it is typically simpler to work with than the prime-counting function, π(x). Both functions are asymptotic to x, a statement equivalent to the prime number theorem.

Both functions are named in honour of Pafnuty Chebyshev.

Contents

[edit] Relationships

The second Chebyshev function can be seen to be related to the first by writing it as

\psi(x)=\sum_{p\le x} k \log p

where k is the unique integer such that pk ≤ x but pk+1 > x. A more direct relationship is given by

\psi(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \vartheta \left(x^{1/n}\right).

Note that this last sum has only a finite number of non-vanishing terms, as

\vartheta \left(x^{1/n}\right) = 0\text{ for }n>\log_2 x\,.

The second Chebyshev function is the logarithm of the least common multiple of the integers from 1 to n.

\operatorname{lcm}(1,2,\dots, n)=e^{\psi(n)}.

[edit] Asymptotics and bounds

Pierre Dusart[1] proved the following bounds for the Chebyshev functions:

\vartheta(p_k)\ge k\left( \ln k+\ln\ln k-1+\frac{\ln\ln k-2.0553}{\ln k}\right) for k ≥ exp(22)
\vartheta(p_k)\le k\left( \ln k+\ln\ln k-1+\frac{\ln\ln k-2}{\ln k}\right) for k ≥ 198
\psi(p_k)\le k\left( \ln k+\ln\ln k-1+\frac{\ln\ln k-2}{\ln k}\right) + 1.43\sqrt x for k ≥ 198
|\vartheta(x)-x|\le0.006788\frac{x}{\ln x} for x ≥ 10,544,111
|\psi(x)-x|\le0.006409\frac{x}{\ln x} for x ≥ exp(22)
\psi(x)-\vartheta(x)<0.0000132\frac{x}{\ln x} for x ≥ exp(30).

Along with \psi(x)\ge \vartheta(x), this gives a good characterization of the behavior of these two functions.

[edit] The exact formula

In 1895, Hans Carl Friedrich von Mangoldt proved[2] an explicit expression for ψ(x) as a sum over the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function:

 \psi_0(x) = x - \sum_{\rho} \frac{x^{\rho}}{\rho} - \frac{\zeta'(0)}{\zeta(0)} - \frac{1}{2} \log (1-x^{-2}).

Here ρ runs over the nontrivial zeros of the zeta function, and ψ0 is the same as ψ, except that at its jump discontinuities (the prime powers) it takes the value halfway between the values to the left and the right:

  \psi_0(x)  = \frac12\left( \sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n)+\sum_{n < x} \Lambda(n)\right) =\begin{cases} \psi(x) - \frac{1}{2} \Lambda(x) & x = 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,13,16,\dots \\  \psi(x) & \mbox{otherwise.} \end{cases}

From the Taylor series for the logarithm, the last term in the explicit formula can be understood as a summation of xω / ω over the trivial zeros of the zeta function, \omega = -2, -4, -6, \ldots, i.e.

 \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{-2k}}{2k} = \frac{1}{2} \log ( 1 - x^{-2} ).

[edit] Properties

A theorem due to Erhard Schmidt states that, for any real, positive K, there are values of x such that

\psi(x)-x < -K\sqrt{x}

and

\psi(x)-x > K\sqrt{x}

infinitely often.[3][4] On big-O notation, one may write the above as

\psi(x)-x \ne O\left(\sqrt{x}\right).

Hardy and Littlewood[5] prove the stronger result, that

\psi(x)-x \ne O\left(\sqrt{x}\log\log\log x\right).

[edit] Relation to primorials

The first Chebyshev function is the logarithm of the primorial of x, denoted x#:

\vartheta(x)=\sum_{p\le x} \log p=\log \prod_{p\le x} p = \log x\#.

This proves that the primorial x# is asymptotically equal to exp((1+o(1))x), where "o" is the little-o notation (see Big O notation) and together with the prime number theorem establishes the asymptotic behavior of pn#.

[edit] Relation to the prime-counting function

The Chebyshev function can be related to the prime-counting function as follows. Define

 \Pi(x) = \sum_{n \leq x} \frac{\Lambda(n)}{\log n}.

Then

 \Pi(x) = \sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n) \int_n^x \frac{dt}{t \log^2 t} + \frac{1}{\log x} \sum_{n \leq x} \Lambda(n) = \int_2^x \frac{\psi(t)\, dt}{t \log^2 t} + \frac{\psi(x)}{\log x}.

The transition from Π to the prime-counting function, π, is made through the equation

 \Pi(x) = \pi(x) + \frac{1}{2} \pi(x^{1/2}) + \frac{1}{3} \pi(x^{1/3}) + \cdots.

Certainly \pi(x) \leq x, so for the sake of approximation, this last relation can be recast in the form

 \pi(x) = \Pi(x) + O(\sqrt x).

[edit] The Riemann hypothesis

The Riemann hypothesis states that all nontrivial zeros of the zeta function have real part 1/2. In this case, |x^{\rho}|=\sqrt x, and it can be shown that

\sum_{\rho} \frac{x^{\rho}}{\rho} = O(\sqrt x \log^2 x).

By the above, this implies

 \pi(x) = \operatorname{li}(x) + O(\sqrt x \log x).

Good evidence that RH could be true comes from the fact proposed by Alain Connes and others, that if we differentiate the von Mangoldt formula with respect to x make x = exp(u). Manipulating, we have the "Trace formula" for the exponential of the Hamiltonian operator satisfying

 \zeta(1/2+i \hat H )|n \ge \zeta(1/2+iE_{n})=0, \,
 \sum_n e^{iu E_{n}}=Z(u) = e^{u/2}-e^{-u/2} \frac{d\psi _0}{du}-\frac{e^{u/2}}{e^{3u}-e^u} = \operatorname{Tr}(e^{iu\hat H }),

where the "trigonometric sum" can be considered to be the trace of the operator (statistical mechanics)  e^{iu \hat H} ,which is only true if ρ = 1 / 2 + iE(n).

Using the semiclassical approach the potential of H = T + V satisfies:

 \frac{Z(u)u^{1/2}}{\sqrt \pi }\sim \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{i (uV(x)+ \pi /4 )}\,dx

with Z(u) → 0 as u → ∞.

[edit] Smoothing function

The smoothed Chebyshev function ψ1(x) − x2/2, for x < 106

The smoothing function is defined as

\psi_1(x)=\int_0^x \psi(t)\,dt.

It can be shown that

\psi_1(x) \sim \frac{x^2}{2}.

[edit] Variational formulation

The Chebyshev function evaluated at x = exp(t) minimizes the functional

 J[f]=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(s)\zeta' (s+c)}{\zeta(s+c)(s+c)}\,ds-\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}f(s)f(t)\,ds\,dt,

so

 f(t)= \psi (e^t)e^{-ct},\,

for c > 0.

[edit] Notes

  • ^  Pierre Dusart, "Sharper bounds for ψ, θ, π, pk", Rapport de recherche n° 1998-06, Université de Limoges. An abbreviated version appeared as "The kth prime is greater than k(ln k + ln ln k − 1) for k ≥ 2", Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 68, No. 225 (1999), pp. 411–415.
  • ^ Erhard Schmidt, "Über die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter gegebener Grenze", Mathematische Annalen, 57 (1903), pp.195–204.
  • ^ G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood, "Contributions to the Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function and the Theory of the Distribution of Primes", Acta Mathematica, 41 (1916) pp.119–196.
  • ^ Davenport, Harold (2000). In Multiplicative Number Theory. Springer. p. 104. ISBN 0-387-95097-4. Google Book Search.

[edit] References

[edit] External links




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots