| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Staff Profile, Deborah Schwarz, RPA, CIBE columbiasurgery.org | Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues | Epidemiology Disease immem-8.org | Dr Foster Intelligence | Coming soon: Landmark report on tackling health... drfosterintelligence.co.u... | Gender inequality in eye care focus of this year's World Sight Day osnsupersite.com |
In mathematics, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality (also known as the Bunyakovsky inequality, the Schwarz inequality, or the Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz inequality), is a useful inequality encountered in many different settings, such as linear algebra applied to vectors, in analysis applied to infinite series and integration of products, and in probability theory, applied to variances and covariances. The general formulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is derived using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality in the Hilbert space of pure quantum states. The inequality for sums was published by Augustin Cauchy (1821), while the corresponding inequality for integrals was first stated by Viktor Yakovlevich Bunyakovsky (1859) and rediscovered by Hermann Amandus Schwarz (1888) (often misspelled "Schwartz"[1]:example on p. 621).
[edit] Statement of the inequalityThe Cauchy–Schwarz inequality states that for all vectors x and y of an inner product space, where Moreover, the two sides are equal if and only if x and y are linearly dependent (or, in a geometrical sense, they are parallel or one of the vectors is equal to zero). If Or even more compactly: Equality holds if and only if x and y are linearly dependent, that is, one is a scalar multiple of the other (which includes the case when one or both are zero). The finite-dimensional case of this inequality for real vectors was proved by Cauchy in 1821, and in 1859 Cauchy's student Bunyakovsky noted that by taking limits one can obtain an integral form of Cauchy's inequality. The general result for an inner product space was obtained by Schwarz in 1885. [edit] ProofLet u, v be arbitrary vectors in the vector space V. The inequality is trivial in the case v = 0, so we will start with <v, v> is nonzero. Let δ be any number in the field F. Then, The above expression is valid for any number δ. Choosing we obtain which is true if and only if or equivalently: which completes the proof. [edit] Notable special cases[edit] RnIn Euclidean space Rn with the standard inner product, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is To prove this form of the inequality, consider the following quadratic polynomial in z. Since it is nonnegative it has at most one real root in z, whence its discriminant is less than or equal to zero, that is, which yields the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. An equivalent proof for Rn starts with the summation below. Expanding the brackets we have:
collecting together identical terms (albeit with different summation indices) we find: Because the left-hand side of the equation is a sum of the squares of real numbers it is greater than or equal to zero, thus: This form is used usually when solving school math problems. Yet another approach when n ≥ 2 (n = 1 is trivial) is to consider the plane containing x and y. More precisely, recoordinatize Rn with any orthonormal basis whose first two vectors span a subspace containing x and y. In this basis only When n = 3 the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality can also be deduced from Lagrange's identity, which takes the form from which readily follows the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. [edit] L2For the inner product space of square-integrable complex-valued functions, one has A generalization of this is the Hölder inequality. [edit] UseThe triangle inequality for the inner product is often shown as a consequence of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, as follows: given vectors x and y: Taking square roots gives the triangle inequality. The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality allows one to extend the notion of "angle between two vectors" to any real inner product space, by defining: The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality proves that this definition is sensible, by showing that the right hand side lies in the interval [−1, 1], and justifies the notion that real inner product spaces are simply generalizations of the Euclidean space. The Cauchy–Schwarz is used to prove that the inner product is a continuous function with respect to the topology induced by the inner product itself. The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is usually used to show Bessel's inequality. [edit] Probability theoryFor random variables X and Y, the expectation of their product is an inner product. That is, and so, by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, Moreover, if μ = E(X) and ν = E(Y), then where Var denotes variance and Cov denotes covariance. [edit] GeneralizationsVarious generalizations of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality exist in the context of operator theory, e.g. for operator-convex functions, and operator algebras, where the domain and/or range of φ are replaced by a C*-algebra or W*-algebra. This section lists a few of such inequalities from the operator algebra setting, to give a flavor of results of this type. [edit] Positive functionals on C*- and W*-algebrasOne can discuss inner products as positive functionals. Given a Hilbert space L2(m), m being a finite measure, the inner product < · , · > gives rise to a positive functional φ by Since < ƒ, ƒ > ≥ 0, φ(f*f) ≥ 0 for all ƒ in L2(m), where ƒ* is pointwise conjugate of ƒ. So φ is positive. Conversely every positive functional φ gives a corresponding inner product < ƒ, g >φ = φ(g*ƒ). In this language, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality becomes which extends verbatim to positive functionals on C*-algebras. We now give an operator theoretic proof for the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality which passes to the C*-algebra setting. One can see from the proof that the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is a consequence of the positivity and anti-symmetry inner-product axioms. Consider the positive matrix Since φ is a positive linear map whose range, the complex numbers C, is a commutative C*-algebra, φ is completely positive. Therefore is a positive 2 × 2 scalar matrix, which implies it has positive determinant: This is precisely the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. If ƒ and g are elements of a C*-algebra, f* and g* denote their respective adjoints. We can also deduce from above that every positive linear functional is bounded, corresponding to the fact that the inner product is jointly continuous. [edit] Positive mapsPositive functionals are special cases of positive maps. A linear map Φ between C*-algebras is said to be a positive map if a ≥ 0 implies Φ(a) ≥ 0. It is natural to ask whether inequalities of Schwarz-type exist for positive maps. In this more general setting, usually additional assumptions are needed to obtain such results. [edit] Kadison's inequalityOne such inequality is the following: Theorem If Φ is a unital positive map, then for every normal element a in its domain, we have Φ(a*a) ≥ Φ(a*)Φ(a) and Φ(a*a) ≥ Φ(a)Φ(a*). This extends the fact φ(a*a) · 1 ≥ φ(a)*φ(a) = |φ(a)|2, when φ is a linear functional. The case when a is self-adjoint, i.e. a = a*, is known as Kadison's inequality. [edit] 2-positive mapsWhen Φ is 2-positive, a stronger assumption than merely positive, one has something that looks very similar to the original Cauchy–Schwarz inequality: Theorem (Modified Schwarz inequality for 2-positive maps) For a 2-positive map Φ between C*-algebras, for all a, b in its domain,
A simple argument for ii) is as follows. Consider the positive matrix By 2-positivity of Φ, is positive. The desired inequality then follows from the properties of positive 2 × 2 (operator) matrices. Part i) is analogous. One can replace the matrix [edit] References
[edit] External links |
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |