Canonical criticism Information & Canonical criticism Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
EPA draws criticism over vermiculite
EPA draws criticism over vermiculite
mesotheliomaweb.org
 Shaw’s Criticism to the Double Effect Doctrine
Shaw’s Criticism to the Double Effect Doctrine
hospicecare.com
 Common Failures and Criticism s of Hypnotherapy - Hypnosis Expert (UK)
Common Failures and Criticisms of Hypnotherapy - Hypnosis Expert (UK)
hypnosisexpert.co.uk
 Breastfeeding - Handling Criticism
Breastfeeding - Handling Criticism
motherandchildhealth.com
 
A portion of the Leningrad Codex. Although the Hebrew Bible is the result of a developmental process, canonical criticism focuses on the final form of the text.

Canonical criticism, sometimes called the canonical approach, is a way of interpreting the Bible that focuses on the text of the biblical canon itself as a finished product. It has been made popular by Brevard Childs, though he personally dislikes the term. Whereas other types of biblical criticism focus on the origins, structure and history of the text, canonical criticism looks at the meaning the text in its final form has for the community which uses it.

Contents

[edit] Description

Canonical criticism involves "paying attention to the present form of the text in determining its meaning for the believing community."[1] Or looking at the text with a view point from today rather than it would be view back then.

[edit] Origins

Canonical criticism is a relatively new approach to biblical studies. As recently as 1983, James Barr could state that canon had no hermeneutical significance for biblical interpretation.[2]

Part of a series on
The Bible
Bible.malmesbury.arp.jpg
Biblical canon and books
Tanakh: Torah · Nevi'im · Ketuvim
Old Testament · New Testament ·
Hebrew Bible
Deuterocanon · Antilegomena
Chapters & verses
Apocrypha: Jewish · OT · NT
Development and authorship
Jewish Canon
Old Testament canon
New Testament canon
Mosaic authorship
Pauline epistles  · Johannine works
Translations and manuscripts
Septuagint · Samaritan Pentateuch
Dead Sea scrolls  · Masoretic text
Targums · Peshitta
Vetus Latina · Vulgate
Gothic Bible · Luther Bible
English Bibles
Biblical studies
Dating the Bible
Biblical criticism
Higher criticism
Textual criticism
Canonical criticism
Novum Testamentum Graece
Documentary hypothesis
Synoptic problem
NT textual categories
Historicity (People)
Internal Consistency
Archeology · Artifacts
Science and the Bible
Interpretation
Hermeneutics · Pesher
Midrash · Pardes
Allegorical · Literalism
Prophecy
Views
Inerrancy · Infallibility · Criticism
Islamic · Qur'anic · Gnostic
Judaism and Christianity
Biblical law in Judaism
Biblical law in Christianity

[edit] Criticism

The canonical approach has been criticised by scholars from both liberal and evangelical perspectives.

[edit] References

  1. ^ John N. Oswalt, "Canonical Criticism: A Review From A Conservative Viewpoint," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 30.3 [1987] 318.
  2. ^ James Barr, Holy Scripture: Canon, Authority, Criticism (Westminster John Knox, 1983), 67.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Norman Gottwald, Social Matrix and Canonical Shape, Theology Today 42 [1985]




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots