Canadian Firearms Registry Information & Canadian Firearms Registry Links at HealthHaven.com

The Canadian Firearms Registry is part of the Canadian Firearms Program. It requires the registration of all guns in Canada. It was introduced by the Liberal government of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and implemented by successive Justice Ministers Allan Rock and Anne McLellan. It requires all usable firearms in Canada to be registered. This was an effort to reduce crime by making every gun traceable. The annual operating costs of the program are reported to be between $15 – $80 million. ^[1]^[2]^[3]

Any person wishing to obtain a firearm must first acquire a Possession and Acquisition Licence or PAL.^[4] The PAL carries a fee of $60 for non-restricted, $80 for restricted, and is renewable every five years. Expiry dates are set on the holder's birthday following the fifth anniversary of the initial issue of the licence.

The current Conservative government is supporting a Private Members Bill (C-391) which proposes to repeal the requirement to register non-restricted firearms. This legislation passed second reading in the House of Commons in November 2009 by a vote of 164 to 137. It is currently being considered by a House Committee. In the interim, the minority Conservative Government has introduced regulatory changes to bring in an amnesty for rifle and shotgun owners facing prosecution for failing to register their firearms. This one-year amnesty, first introduced in 2006, has been thrice extended in April 2007, May 2008 and again in May 2009, now to May 16, 2010.^[5]

[edit] Early history

Canada had a gun registry earlier during the Second World War, when all people were compelled to register their firearms out of fear of enemy subversion. This registry was discontinued after the war; however, all handguns have been subject to registration since 1934. In addition, fully automatic firearms have been prohibited (with grandfathering exemptions to existing, licensed collectors of full-automatic weapons and theatrical users) since 1977. In the mid-1990s, short-barreled handguns and those firing .25 ACP and .32 ACP ammunition, with the exception of certain guns typically used in shooting competitions, were added to the list of prohibited firearms.

[edit] Bill C-68

The Firearms registry was created by Bill C-68, An Act Respecting Firearms and Other Weapons, was introduced in 1993, and aimed at the licensing of all gun owners and registration of all firearms. It was given passed by Parliament and given Royal assent in 1995. The Canadian Firearms Centre was established in 1996 to oversee the administration of its measures.^[6]

[edit] Initial opposition

Political opposition to the registry, particularly outside of Canada's major cities, was immediate. The provincial governments of Ontario and Alberta also attacked the bill arguing it exceeded the federal government's mandate, however the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the registry in Reference re Firearms Act. The provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut refused to prosecute people who didn't register their guns. ^[7]

Wikinews has related news: Canadian PM seeks to abandon gun registry

The Conservative Party of Canada claims to remain committed to scrapping the registry. They claim that if the same amount of money was invested in expanding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) force instead of requiring gun registration, far more lives would be saved.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Cost overruns

The registry again became a political issue in the early 2000s when massive cost overruns were reported.

In December 2002, the Auditor-General of Canada, Sheila Fraser, reported that the project was running vastly above initial cost estimates. The report shows that the implementation of the firearms registry program by the Department of Justice has had significant strategic and management problems throughout. Taxpayers were originally expected to pay only $2 million of the budget while registration fees would cover the rest. In 1995, the Department of Justice reported to Parliament that the system would cost $119 million to implement, and that the income generated from licensing fees would be $117 million. This gives a net cost of $2 million. At the time of the 2002 audit, the revised estimates from the Department of Justice were that the cost of the program would be more than $1 billion by 2004/05 and that the income from licence fees in the same period would be $140 million.

The causes of the cost overruns have been blamed on the inexperience of the Justice Department in managing a project of such scale. Especially crucial was that the scope of the project was in continuous flux requiring continuous changes to the basic set-up of the registry.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Allegations of improper lobbying

In January 2006, Tony Bernardo, director of the 12,000-member Canadian Shooting Sports Association, asked the RCMP to probe a Liberal Party consultant over a $380,000 contract that was awarded to lobby the federal government for funds for the ailing firearms registry. The five-month contract was awarded by the Justice Department in March 2003 to lobby the federal Solicitor General, Treasury Board and Privy Council, according to a detailed lobbyist report.^[8]. No formal probe by the RCMP resulted.^{[citation needed]} Bernardo asked rhetorically whether "[it isn't] inappropriate for the Federal Government to hire a private lobbyist with taxpayers' dollars to lobby itself?"

[edit] Use of the registry

Police departments frequently use the Canadian Firearms Registry data base to allow police officers to check if a residence or property might contain a registered firearm before responding to a call. The gun registry has received support from the Canadian Association of Police Chiefs. Chief Jack Ewatski, president of the CACP, and Chief Armand LaBarge, president of the Ontario Association of Police Chiefs, stated that police officers across the country search the registry about 18 times per day. (Instead of the misled 9,400 a day where any personal information search is count as a hit)^{[citation needed]} However, most of those 5,000 queries are generated automatically when other queries are submitted to the CPIC system. In actual fact, as the Auditor General found, there is no reliable information to suggest how many times per day police officers intentionally access the firearms registry.^{[citation needed]}

The Canadian Firearms Centre says police make more than 13,000 queries to the system each week.^[9]

In a Canada Firearms Centre (CAFC) survey, 92% of general duty police officers stated that they use the system.^[10]

[edit] Gun registry effect on public safety

In a Canada Firearms Centre (CAFC) survey, 74% of general duty police officers stated that the registry "query results have proven beneficial during major operations.".^[11]

However, the Auditor General's report found that the program does not collect data to analyse the effectiveness of the gun registry in meeting its stated goal of improving public safety. The report states:

The performance report focuses on activities such as issuing licenses and registering firearms. The Centre does not show how these activities help minimize risks to public safety with evidence-based outcomes such as reduced deaths, injuries and threats from firearms.^[12]

Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Julian Fantino is opposed to the gun registry, stating in a press release:

We have an ongoing gun crisis including firearms-related homicides lately in Toronto, and a law registering firearms has neither deterred these crimes nor helped us solve any of them. None of the guns we know to have been used were registered, although we believe that more than half of them were smuggled into Canada from the United States. The firearms registry is long on philosophy and short on practical results considering the money could be more effectively used for security against terrorism as well as a host of other public safety initiatives."^[13]

Meanwhile, Edgar MacLeod, president of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police states that "while the cost of the registry had become an embarrassment, the program works and provides a valuable service. In a typical domestic violence situation, he says, investigating police officers rely on the registry to determine if guns are present. Onboard computers in police cruisers, or a call to central dispatch, alerts officers to any firearms registered to occupants of the house."^[9]

[edit] Security

John Hicks, an Orillia-area computer consultant, and webmaster for the Canada Firearms Centre, has said that anyone with a home computer could have easily accessed names, addresses and detailed shopping lists (including make, model and serial number) of registered guns belonging to licensed firearms owners. Hicks told the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (OFAH) that "During my tenure as the CFC webmaster I duly informed management that the website that interfaced to the firearms registry was flawed. It took some $15 million to develop and I broke inside into it within 30 minutes."^[14]

Hicks says that the CFC's former system allowed hackers to find vulnerable user accounts and fool the system into thinking that the hacker was the actual licensed gun owner. Mr. Hicks said he repeatedly warned CFC management to properly protect gun owners' personal information before he filed an official complaint with the Privacy Commissioner. Hicks says that the Privacy Commissioner responded that they would investigate further should anyone complain that they were targeted due to information gleaned from the CFRS database.

The Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters^[15] questioned the security of the gun registry after a home invasion that seemed to target a licensed gun collector. The OFAH argues that, in the wrong hands, a database detailing the whereabouts of every legally-owned firearm in Canada is a potential shopping list for criminals.

[edit] Role in United States gun politics

The National Rifle Association and other guns rights groups in the United States have used the Canadian registry as an example of the potential failure such a system would be if implemented in the United States which has far more firearms in private circulation than Canada.^{[citation needed]}

The Violence Policy Center has argued against such a system being implemented in the United States on the grounds that it would not reduce gun violence in America.^[16]

[edit] See also

[edit] References