Behrens v. Pelletier Information & Behrens v. Pelletier Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Dr. Konstanze Behrens dentist in Luebeck - doctor's profile by The...
Dr. Konstanze Behrens dentist in Luebeck - doctor's profile by The...
die-endverbraucher.com
 Structural Integration with Olivier...
Structural Integration with Olivier...
restorativehealth.org
 On Tools by Rev. Dan Pelletier
On Tools by Rev. Dan Pelletier
saskworld.com
 Conditions - Dr. Kenneth R. Pelletier - The Best Alternative...
Conditions - Dr. Kenneth R. Pelletier - The Best Alternative...
drpelletier.com
 
Behrens v. Pelletier
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 7, 1995
Decided February 21, 1996
Full case name Behrens v. Pelletier
Citations 516 U.S. 299 (more)
Holding
A defendant's immediate appeal of an unfavorable qualified-immunity ruling on a motion to dismiss does not deprive the court of appeals of jurisdiction over a second appeal, also based on qualified immunity, immediately following denial of summary judgment.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas and Ginsburg
Dissent Breyer, joined by Stevens

Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299 (1996) was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court held a defendant's immediate appeal of an unfavorable qualified immunity ruling on a motion to dismiss does not deprive the court of appeals of jurisdiction over a second appeal, also based on qualified immunity, immediately following denial of summary judgment.

Contents

[edit] Background

The Federal Home Loan Bank Board fired Robert Pelletier (Plaintiff) as the provisional managing officer of Pioneer Savings and Loans Associations after the agent responsible for monitoring Pioneer’s operations, John Behrens (Defendant), recommended such action. The basis of Behrens recommendation was an investigation involving the collapse of another financial institution, and possible misconduct by Pelletier. Pelletier filled suite arguing wrongfully termination, and John Behrens claimed he was acting on behalf of the government and therefore was he was entitled to qualified immunity.[1]

[edit] Issue

At issue is if a defendant's initial appeal for qualified immunity is unfavorable, does this ruling deprive the court of appeals jurisdiction of over a subsequent appeal based on the same claim, i.e., qualified immunity.

[edit] References

[edit] External links

[edit] See also

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 516




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots