The four nominees for the Tate gallery's 2008 Turner Prize were Runa Islam, Mark Leckey, Goshka Macuga and Cathy Wilkes. The chairman of the jury was Tate Britain director, Stephen Deuchar. The award went to Mark Leckey on 1 December.
Nicholas Serota made a short speech before the award was presented by Nick Cave. Leckey had not prepared an acceptance speech. In an interview with Channel 4 News directly following the announcement Leckey said "the worst place to be in terms of critics is Britain. They like middlebrow art. I don't make middlebrow art. Sod 'em."[1]
[edit] Exhibition
An exhibition of work by the nominees was shown at Tate Britain from September 30 2008 to January 18 2009. The curator was Carolyn Kerr [2].
The Turner Prize is awarded for a show by the artist in the previous year [3]. When nominees are told of their nomination they then prepare exhibits for the Turner Prize exhibition, often at short notice[3]. As such, the Turner Prize exhibition may not feature the works for which the artist was initially nominated by the judges[3]. However the Turner Prize exhibition tends to be the basis on which public and press judge the artist's worthiness for nomination[3].
[edit] Nominees
There were four nominees for the prize:
It was the first time in a decade that three of the four nominees for the £25,000 award have been women [6].
Stephen Deuchar who chaired the jury has said "the prize is not there to award the most competent artist at work today, but to draw attention to what the jury considers new developments." [7]
[edit] Works and press coverage
[edit] Runa Islam
Runa Islam's exhibited works are three films:
- First Day of Spring[8]
- A film shot in Dhaka, Bangladesh where Islam was born. It shows a group of rickshaw drivers taking a rest beside a deserted avenue on the first day of spring [5][6][9].
- Cinematography[8]
- A film shot using a mechanically controlled camera programmed, in its movement, to spell out the word 'CINEMATOGRAPHY'. The footage is of a film apparatus workshop used by JC Harry Harrison (a motion-control pioneer) in New Zealand involved in the making of The Lord of the Rings (movie)[8]. The camera moves around the location filming hardware and shelving to the sound of motor noises.
- Be The First To see What You see As You see It[6]
- A film showing a dreamlike sequence of a well dressed woman approaching items of crockery placed on plinths and then gently pushing the crockery off onto the floor [5][6][8][10].
Artist's comment:
- First Day of Spring
- "I allowed the rickshaw pullers you see to take 'center stage', to counter the marginal roles they play within the socio-economic climate." [11]
- Cinematography
- "I found in my notebook the sentence 'writing with the camera' and this inspired me. The word 'cinematography' is basically 'writing with movement', or better, 'to record in movement', just as photography is 'writing in light'. I wanted to write the word itself with the camera, to realize a sort of tattoo on a landscape where the starting and ending point coincide." [12]
- Be The First To see What You see As You see It
- The meaning [is] not prescribed (as with almost all of my works)[...] I think my work allows you to use different prisms through which to read it."[12]
The critics said:
- (Regarding Cinematography) "without the intervention of the curator it is virtually impossible for the viewer to figure out what we are supposed to find that's interesting. This art is academic because it was made not to communicate but to be explained. It exists solely to give lecturers and gallery guides a reason to get up in the morning." "[Watching Cinematography] is torture" - The Telegraph [6]
- "analyses the language of cinema [...] so slowly and minutely that you start to want to scream. - The Times[13]
- "The three [films] here are slow, repetitious, and self-referential in their focus on the tediously obvious." - Financial Times
- "the Turner can still keep some dignity this year, so long as Runa Islam wins." - The Guardian (Jonathan Jones) [14]
- "her work is steeped in film theory and very skilfully edited. But it made me think of better film-artists who ought to have won." - The Observer[15]
[edit] Mark Leckey
Mark Leckey's exhibited works are:
- Industrial Light & Magic
- Felix gets Broadcasted
- Made in 'Eaven
- Cinema-in-the-Round
- A 40 minute long lecture delivered by Leckey wearing evening dress, he explains why he finds some aspects of contemporary art effective and covers such subjects as cats, James Cameron's Titanic, images and objects.[2][5][6]
The critics said:
- (Regarding Cinema-in-the-Round) "it was gratifying to see that even members of the live audience were talking and getting up to leave." - The Telegraph [6]
- "comes closest to capturing the chaotic flux of the contemporary - or at least he was the artist who most succeeded in making me feel old." - The Times [13]
- "Mark Leckey, must win if only because here at last were glimmers of wit [...] with energy and a colourful response to a visually overloaded world." - Financial Times [16]
- "Diverting in small doses, on a large scale it is exposed as minor art." - The Guardian [14]
[edit] Goshka Macuga
Goshka Macuga's exhibited works are:
- Deutsches Volk-Deutsche Arbeit
- A glass and steel construction in a limited spiral shape.
- House der Frau 1
- House der Frau 2
- Different Sky (Rain)
Macuga's work incorporates photographs by surrealist Paul Nash and drawings by his mistress Eileen Agar. There are also sculptures utilising the work of Mies van der Rohe made in glass and steel. [7]
The critics said:
- "sterile work" - The Telegraph [6]
- "rather beautiful...oddly moving" - The Guardian [5]
- "She has delved into the Tate archives to produce a counter-history of surrealism and modern design with devastatingly dull consequences." - The Guardian (Jonathan Jones) [10]
- "[Her work] has the theatricality of a bike-rack outside an office window [...] as visually intriguing as an airport lobby." - The Times [13]
- "dowdy, obscure and over-formal" - Financial Times [16]
- "has turned the scrap of previous exhibits into, er, different scrap" - The Sun [17]
- "cold, colourless and short-lived" - The Observer [15]
[edit] Cathy Wilkes
Cathy Wilkes' exhibited work is:
- I Give You All My Money
- Two female mannequins in a scene somewhat like a supermarket checkout. One mannequin sits naked on a lavatory with items dangling from her head; a nurse's cap. rusty shoehorses, a deflated balloon, charred bits of wood. The other's head is enclosed in a bird cage. The scene is covered with detritus: unwashed bowls and spoons with porridge and salad dried on. The everyday items are from the artist's own home as are the leftovers.
Wilkes says of her work that it "apprehends an end point in our understanding of things as they are - a point at which words become insufficient, and the naming of objects is disconnected from our experience of them." [6]
The critics said:
- "Wilkes is using a surrealistic vocabulary that was out of date in 1940, or that her take on feminism is one that that Betty Friedan would have recognised 40 years ago." - The Telegraph [6]
- "Wilkes' art is a poke in the eye, a sort of curse. She goes on and on doing the same thing, and her insistence is telling and painful." - The Guardian [5]
- "I can't believe that what looks like so-so student work made it onto the shortlist." - The Guardian (Jonathan Jones) [14]
- "a sinister Tracey Emin spinning strangely fetishistic, idiosyncratic tales." - The Times [13]
- "[a] feeble piece" - Financial Times [16]
- "it is too busy hammering its point home with all the didacticism of a fifth-form project" - The Observer [15]
[edit] Critic's reception of exhibition as a whole
- "The shortlist for this year's Turner Prize is so wilfully opaque it's irrelevant." - The Telegraph [6]
- "there's a depth and complexity [in the Turner exhibition] that, it would be nice to think, might overtake the usual chat about winners and losers." - The Guardian [5]
- "reflects a mentality only too dominant in art magazines and curating right now - a rather overthought, overtalked, pseudo-intellectual culture." - The Guardian (Jonathan Jones)[14]
- "I can't help thinking that this show will prove more like the returns desk of Ikea on a Monday morning. Lots of frustrated people will be left staring at a pile of inscrutable junk." - The Times [13]
- "Don’t go. Don’t even think about going. This year’s Turner Prize exhibition is without competition the worst in the history of the award." - Financial Times [16]
- "If ever you were thinking of giving the Turner Prize a miss then 2008 is the ideal year." - The Observer [15]
Outside the exhibition, the Stuckists art group handed out leaflets with the message "The Turner Prize is Crap", to protest at the prize's lack of figurative painting. [2]
[edit] Notes and references
- ^ Channel 4 News, TX 1 December 2008
- ^ a b c d e f g Akbar, Arifa (2008-09-30). "A mannequin on a toilet and dry porridge � it's the Turner Prize - News, Art & Architecture - The Independent" (newspaper). http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art-and-architecture/news/a-mannequin-on-a-toilet-and-dry-porridge-ndash-its-the-turner-prize-945945.html. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d Barber, Lynn (2006-10-01). "Lynn Barber: How I suffered for art's sake" (newspaper). Guardian Unlimited. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2006/oct/01/art.turnerprize2006. Retrieved 2008-10-14.
- ^ a b c d Channel 4 News - Turner nominees announced
- ^ a b c d e f g Searle, Adrian (2008-09-30). "Adrian Searle on the Turner prize" (newspaper). Guardian Unlimited. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/sep/30/turnerprize.art1. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Dorment, Richard (2008-09-29). "The Turner Prize 2008: who cares who wins? - Telegraph" (newspaper). Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/09/29/baturnerrd129.xml. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b Nordland, Rod (2008). "Weird Exhibits Compete for Britain's Turner Prize - You Call That Art?". Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/id/162301. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d Brown, Mark (2008-09). "Makes you think? Turner prize show opens". Guardian Unlimited. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/sep/30/turnerprize.art. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ Still images at White Cube website
- ^ Still images at White Cube website
- ^ ART iT interview
- ^ a b ART iT [1]
- ^ a b c d e Campbell-Johnston, Rachel (2008-09-30). "Turner Prize: don't scream, it doesn't mean anything at all". Times Online. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/article4849303.ece. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d Jones, Jonathan (2008-10-07). "What has gone wrong with the Turner prize?". Guardian Unlimited. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2008/oct/07/turner.prize.shortlist.2008. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d Cumming, Laura (2008-10-05). "Sshh... it's the Turner Prize". Observer.co.uk. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/oct/05/turnerprize. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ a b c d Wullschlager, Jackie (2008-09-29). "Turner fight begins again". Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/350b3c6a-8e3d-11dd-8089-0000779fd18c.html. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
- ^ Le Plot, Toulouse (2008-09-30). "Arty farty". The Sun. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1748039.ece. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
[edit] External links
- Online slideshows
- Online video coverage
- Audio
- Guardian
- Audio available as downloadable mp3 or through a player embedded in the page.
- Press coverage