2003 El Nogal Club bombing Information & 2003 El Nogal Club bombing Links at HealthHaven.com

El Nogal Club bombing
Location	Bogotá, Colombia
Date	February 7, 2003
Attack type	Car bombing
Death(s)	36
Injured	200+
Perpetrator(s)	FARC .

The 2003 El Nogal Club bombing was a terrorist attack that occurred in Bogotá, Colombia. On February 7, 2003, a car containing 200 kg of explosives that was parked in a garage on the third floor of the multi-story El Nogal club exploded, killing 36 people and wounding more than 200. There were approximately 600 people in the building at the time of the explosion. The attack was the worst in Colombia for more than a decade.^[1]^[2]

No group publicly claimed responsibility for the bombing.

Colombian Vice President Francisco Santos blamed the guerrilla group FARC, saying that there was "not the slightest doubt" that they were responsible and that the government had enough evidence of its involvement. Colombian authorities and investigators, with the aid of ATF members from the U.S., inspected the scene and the remains of the car bomb. Colombian prosecutors linked FARC to the bombing through the participation of, among others, John Freddy Arellan, a squash instructor who died in the bombing. According to authorities, Arellan had recently acquired membership in the club and drove the car containing the explosives, a vehicle which had been bought in late 2002 using false documents, into the parking area. Arrellan would have been employed by FARC's "Javier Paz", not knowing that the bomb would be detonated with him and his uncle still inside the club. ^[3] ^[4] ^[5]

On March 10, 2003, FARC denied any responsibility in the attack and described it as "state terrorism", claiming that the government of Colombia planted the bomb in order to unite the country against them.^[6]^[7]

In March 2008, Colombian authorities released documents said to be found in a computer belonging to the slain FARC commander "Raúl Reyes", including a February 13, 2003 message in which "Reyes" called the attack a "formidable act" and mentioned the "political convenience of denying responsibilities".^[8]