This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page. It does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve it by citing reliable sources. Tagged since July 2009. Its introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Tagged since July 2009. It is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. Tagged since July 2009.

[edit] Magnetic monopole

In physics, a magnetic monopole is a hypothetical particle^[1] that is a magnet with only one pole (see Maxwell's equations for more on magnetic poles). In more technical terms, it would have a net "magnetic charge". Modern interest in the concept stems from particle theories, notably the grand unification theory and superstring theories, which predict their existence.^[2][3]

[edit] 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole

In theoretical physics, the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole (hedgehog) is a topological soliton similar to the Dirac monopole but without any singularities. It arises in the case of a Yang–Mills theory with a gauge group G, coupled to a Higgs field which spontaneously breaks it down to a smaller group H via the Higgs mechanism. It was first found independently by Gerard 't Hooft and Alexander Polyakov^{[4] [5]}.

Unlike the Dirac monopole, the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole is a smooth solution with a finite total energy. The solution is localized around r = 0. Very far from the origin, the gauge group G is broken to H, and the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole reduces to the Dirac monopole.

However, at the origin itself, the G gauge symmetry is unbroken and the solution is non-singular also near the origin. The Higgs field

is proportional to

where the adjoint indices are identified with the three-dimensional spatial indices. The gauge field at infinity is such that the Higgs field's dependence on the angular directions is pure gauge. The precise configuration for the Higgs field and the gauge field near the origin is such that it satisfies the full Yang–Mills–Higgs equations of motion.

[edit] Mathematical details

Suppose the vacuum is the vacuum manifold Σ. Then, for finite energies, as we move along each direction towards spatial infinity, the state along the path approaches a point on the vacuum manifold Σ. Otherwise, we would not have a finite energy. In topologically trivial 3 + 1 dimensions, this means spatial infinity is homotopically equivalent to the topological sphere S². So, the superselection sectors are classified by the second homotopy group of Σ, π₂(Σ).

In the special case of a Yang–Mills–Higgs theory, the vacuum manifold is isomorphic to the quotient space G/H and the relevant homotopy group is π₂(G/H). Note that this doesn't actually require the existence of a scalar Higgs field. Most symmetry breaking mechanisms (e.g. technicolor) would also give rise to a 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole.

It's easy to generalize to the case of d + 1 dimensions. We have π_d−1(Σ).

[edit] Monopole problem

The "monopole problem" refers to the cosmological implications of Grand unification theories (GUT). Since monopoles are generically produced in GUT during the cooling of the universe, and since they are expected to be quite massive, their existence threatens to overclose it. This is considered a "problem" within the standard Big Bang theory. Cosmic inflation remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles.

[edit] References

1. ^ Particle Data Group summary of magnetic monopole search
2. ^ Wen, Xiao-Gang; Witten, Edward, Electric and magnetic charges in superstring models,Nuclear Physics B, Volume 261, p. 651-677
3. ^ S. Coleman, The Magnetic Monopole 50 years Later, reprinted in Aspects of Symmetry
4. ^ G. 't Hooft, Nuclear Physics B79, 276 (1974)
5. ^ A.M. Polyakov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis'ma. Red. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)]